|
|
Post by brownn on May 26, 2011 2:24:14 GMT -5
It appears as though there were two men who appeared to be "George Harrison" as early as the "Hamburg" era of Beatle-dom. Because the two b&w pics look like two different men, who resemble each other closely. Not the same men. So one of those b&w pics, my opinion is the top left was the true George Harrison, and the bottom left was the imposter. And the color pics are those men in later years. It looks to me that the real George Harrison lived longer than the true other Beatles had. It looks as if they took the real George out of circulation for a time while using the fake George, and then using the real George in the latter part of the 60's and then in the late 70's and early 80's. And then using the fake George in the latter part in the "life" of George Harrison image. Because when I see pics of Dhani, I see the real George, and not the look a like. So this tells me that the real George lived beyond the late 60's and into the 80's. Never thought of this situation until looking at these pics. George was used interchangeably. Still wondering if John's image had been piddled with in the same manner, the real John, a fake Lennon, and a resurgence with the real Lennon, and then the imposter was used until they took out the life form we knew of as "John Lennon". Because the latter 60's seemed like a fake Lennon, but times in the 70's it seemed like the real John was appearing, but just a weathered and worn self. Very strange to use them interchanging during different periods of the "life"....rather than just having one replacement for the duration, as Bill/Faul has been used. Perhaps they decided one man to play "Paul" that we know as "Bill/Faul" and the others used interchanging them... Strange procedures...but we are not talking about people with "normal" human functions and reasoning....those who are in control of such manipulations have no scruples or human reasoning...they have no feelings of humanity..they just have power and want to control the world...like those images of "mad scientists" we had seen depicted in those hideous "B" sci fi flicks of the 50's and early 60's. I'm agree with u but.. it's possible that Macca had been interchanged along different periods like the others? and if this were true.... ¿The real Macca is still alive?  |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on May 26, 2011 8:27:21 GMT -5
^Who is the real Macca? What period are you talking about in Beatles history or in Paul McCartney(pre-Beatle) history for that matter?
|
|
|
|
Post by brownn on Jun 18, 2011 0:55:23 GMT -5
^Who is the real Macca? What period are you talking about in Beatles history or in Paul McCartney(pre-Beatle) history for that matter? For me, the real Paul was part of the Beatles before 1967 (Sgt. Pepper's era).. and lucy's comment made me think about he could have been interchanged along different periods and this would mean that McCartney is alive. But when I listen to recordings of the beatles, I notice many differences in Paul's voice since 1967 and the truth is that the voice of the last period is more like that of Paul we know today. |
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Jun 19, 2011 1:32:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 19, 2011 7:13:33 GMT -5
This looks like a grave to me  ...and another hint  |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jun 19, 2011 11:50:57 GMT -5
This looks like a grave to me ...and another hint God, great work artemis. I never thought about the grave on that GH Best of. And I've looked at it many times! |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jun 28, 2011 20:26:34 GMT -5
It does look like a tombstone...and what's even more strange, the image on the grave looks like the first Feorge and not the real George....IMO
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 29, 2011 3:04:25 GMT -5
True, the image shows a fake George. After all that album belongs to one of the FEORGE's so no wonder.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 15, 2011 4:41:11 GMT -5
"Here comes the... unseen footage of George Harrison as documentary is released
Previously unseen footage of George Harrison features in a mammoth documentary about the former Beatle to be released later this year.
Bandmates Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr are interviewed in the three-and-a-half hour film produced by Oscar-winning director Martin Scorsese and Harrison's widow, Olivia.
Named after his 1973 album, Living in the Material World traces the guitarist's life from his working class beginnings in Liverpool to his fame with the Fab Four in the 1960s.
It will also cover his later years as a solo musician, member of 'supergroup' the Traveling Wilburys and work as a philanthropist and filmmaker.
The film includes home movies and interviews with Eric Clapton, Yoko Ono, Phil Spector, the Beatles' producer George Martin and Monty Python stars Terry Gilliam and Eric Idle.
Harrison died of lung cancer in 2001 in Los Angeles at the age of 58.
Although often referred to as the quiet Beatle, he wrote hit songs like 'Here Comes the Sun' and 'Something' for group, before bringing out his own solo albums and later playing with the Traveling Wilburys in the Eighties.
Scorsese, whose music projects include The Last Waltz in 1978 about the final concert of The Band, and the Rolling Stones documentary Shine A Light, said he had long been a fan of Harrison.
'So when I was offered the chance to make this picture, I jumped at it,' he said.
'Spending time with Olivia Harrison, interviewing so many of George's closest friends, reviewing all that footage, some of it never seen before, and listening to all of that magnificent music - it was a joy, and an experience I'll always treasure.'
The director added: 'I first came to know George through the music, which was the soundtrack of our world – those beautifully lyrical guitar breaks and solos, those unforgettable songs of George's like I Me Mine or If I Needed Someone.
'After the Beatles George and his music seemed to open up and flower. I will never forget the first time I heard All Things Must Pass, the overwhelming feeling of taking in all that glorious music for the first time.
A book will accompany the documentary, which is released on DVD in October.
It will also be shown by the BBC in Novermber, to coincide with the tenth anniversary of Harrison's death."
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Sept 5, 2011 5:15:42 GMT -5
WTF, bunch of lies, thats one of the FEORGE all about...
"‘Quiet’ Beatle George Harrison was a red-blooded womaniser who almost split from his wife because of his wayward behaviour
He was affectionately known as ‘the quiet Beatle’.
But George Harrison was in fact a womaniser, whose love of the opposite sex almost ruined his 23-year-marriage, a new documentary has revealed.
In the upcoming film, directed by Martin Scorcese, former bandmate Paul McCartney claims the guitarist ‘liked the things that men like. He was red-blooded.’
Harrison’s widow, Olivia, admitted she often struggled with her wayward husband’s behaviour.
She claims that although she and Harrison ‘seemed like partners from the very beginning’ their marriage survived a series of ‘hiccups’.
‘He did like women and women did like him,’ she says. ‘If he just said a couple of words to you it would have a profound effect. So it was hard to deal with someone who was so well loved.’
Miss Harrison worked alongside Scorcese to produce private letters, journals and unseen footage of the star for the film George Harrison: Living in a Material World, which has been made to coincide with the tenth anniversary of the star’s death. He died in November 2001, aged 58, following a long-battle with cancer.
It also features personal recollections from friends including Ringo Starr and Eric Clapton.
Harrison earned a reputation as the most reserved character out of the Beatles, in contrast to John Lennon, Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr who were the more outspoken members of the Fab Four.
But according to his widow, although her husband’s attitude towards women was ‘challenging’ she claims the couple felt an ‘incredible reward’ after overcoming their problems.
She added: ‘You go through challenges in your marriage and here is what I found: the first time we had a big hiccup in the road, we came through things, and then you go, ‘Wow!’ There is a reward at the end of it.’
‘There is this incredible reward because you have lived through more and you have let go of something.’
By the end, when her husband was ill, she admits she was glad that they had ‘worked this through together. Through all these things that came between us.’
She also reveals Harrison’s fury at John Lennon’s murder in 1980 by Mark Chapman. ‘He was angry John did not have a chance to leave his body in a better way,’ she said.
In the film, which is being released in October and shown on the BBC later this year, Clapton also talks about how he felt consumed with envy as he fell in love with Pattie Boyd, Harrison’s first wife.
Clapton said: ‘I had become more and more obsessed with George’s wife, Pattie. To be honest there was a lot of swapping and fooling around.’
It is the latest music documentary made by Oscar-winning director Scorsese. He has shot a history of the blues, a concert film of the Rolling Stones and an acclaimed movie of Bob Dylan.
Ringo Starr is brought to tears on screen by the memory of his final conversation with Harrison who, dying in a Swiss hospital bed, still managed a bleak joke. Starr had to leave because his daughter was undergoing emergency brain surgery in Los Angeles.
‘George said: ‘Do you want me to come with you?’ They were the last words I heard him say.’
As well as Scorcese’s film, an exhibition is being created at the Grammy Museum in Los Angeles, the first major museum retrospective of the late musician’s life and career, while Miss Harrison has also written a book about his life.
Talking about her decision to write the biography, she said she had uncovered so much during the five-year process of making the documentary that ‘it seemed a shame not to share that.’
‘There was just too much material that Marty didn’t use — ephemera, letters. It lent itself to a pictorial arc of George’s life.’
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Sept 5, 2011 14:19:10 GMT -5
NYU film school graduate Martin Scorcese= CIA scum. Imposter replaCIAments put a new spin on adultery! Let's say that Eric Clapton was one of the George Harrison-imposters (perhaps the real Harrison died/disappeared in the early 1960s, pre-fame). MI6 media Agent Clapton has a girlfriend, "Patti." He maintains both the Clapton identity and the George identity, alternating between disguises in the same time period. Where does that leave Patti, as a "Fistress" Mistress? There's a purple python slithering below moptop-George on the Sgt. Pepper album cover (May 1967). The Python Oxford/Cambridge elite comedy troupe began as "The Pythons" in 1965. The MOnty Python TV show had recurring characters called the "pepperpots "Feorge Farrison became heavily (overtly) involved with Monty (I was Monty's Double) Python in the 1970s and 1980s as their friend, guest star and movie produced, and "Rutles" parody producer ad apparent advisor. There was lot of overlap between the Bonzo Dogs, Python and the Beatles/Featles.... just noting this now for future exploration ( it has been discussed in this forum and the NIR forum previously. Incongruously-named "Pepperpots" on Monty Python are the high-pitched, in-drag hausfraus characters that usually add annoyance and lack-of-funny to python sketches. And of course, we have these 1964 "Pepperpots" mysterious Beatles-mimics, apparently referenced on the real Featles' 1967 Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. img119.imageshack.us/img119/5189/billypepperlps2xc.jpg The one and only Billy (Pepper) Shears"?! Feorge Farrison in Monty Python's "Life of Brian" (1979) www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbZRNM-9RKo[youtube] www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbZRNM-9RKo[/youtube]Fohn Fennon talks about Monty Python on Dec. 6, 1980: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAe4BXblMwA |
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Sept 5, 2011 18:47:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Sept 15, 2011 19:13:53 GMT -5
So who is the bigger adulterer? George or Feorge?  And are we talking about Feorge #1 with the thinner and long face, or the latter Feorge who had a wider face? Or all of the above??? And when discussing Eric Clapton, are we talking about the real deal or "Feric".... when discussing the Featles....we need to be specific on which fake one... Same way with when Fennon was killed....which Fennon and which Feorge...now that's the question.... |
|
|
|
Post by treegenus on Sept 16, 2011 11:27:41 GMT -5
So who is the bigger adulterer? George or Feorge? And are we talking about Feorge #1 with the thinner and long face, or the latter Feorge who had a wider face? Or all of the above??? And when discussing Eric Clapton, are we talking about the real deal or "Feric"....when discussing the Featles....we need to be specific on which fake one...Same way with when Fennon was killed....which Fennon and which Feorge...now that's the question.... Oh, hell, in my mind Lucy, it's not too confusing if I think of ALL of'em as phonies and then who gives a @#$%. All the World's a Stage and the actors and scripts are quite bizzare! Reminds me of Jim Carey's The Truman Show film that chronicled the life of a guy who was (initially) unaware that he was living in a constructed reality TV show, being broadcast 7-24 to billions of people across the globe. Hey, maybe TPTB are viewing US all that way! Ha! |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Sept 16, 2011 19:47:42 GMT -5
That reminds me of an old Twilight Zone episode when Roddy Mc Dowell was in an elaborate home setting that was to make him comfortable, all the while being on display for those of another "planet" to observe.
My abovementioned post was more like this, most of the "world" or the masses think of the "Beatles" as the same people throughout the entire era of Beatles from the mania of the early days, through the studio until the last setting in Abbey Road.... These people read the books, or watch the films that are about the Beatles, and they see what they think they see, the same people....and I say, which one? We have seen many faces...they see only one....
|
|
And are we talking about Feorge #1 with the thinner and long face, or the latter Feorge who had a wider face? Or all of the above???