|
|
Post by beatlies on Nov 27, 2009 19:15:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Dec 12, 2009 14:35:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by thewinged on Dec 12, 2009 15:25:54 GMT -5
When did he say that?
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Dec 12, 2009 17:53:22 GMT -5
^ I'm not sure, Winged. "The Beatles exist apart from my Self. I am not really Beatle George. Beatle George is like a suit or shirt that I once wore on occasion and until the end of my life people may see that shirt and mistake it for me." - George Harrison www.amiright.com/artists/beatles.shtml |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Dec 12, 2009 18:47:45 GMT -5
"We ice skate."
- (the real) George Harrison - 1964 when asked by a reporter 'What do you do when you're cooped up in a hotel room between shows?'
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Nov 11, 2010 18:49:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Nov 13, 2010 14:20:36 GMT -5
Interesting quote from "George" circa 1995  |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Nov 13, 2010 20:23:45 GMT -5
"Not really Beatle George" indeed!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on May 15, 2011 20:17:46 GMT -5
Which one of these is the real George?  |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on May 16, 2011 4:48:10 GMT -5
On the right, clearly we have 2 FEORGE's, but on the left... pretty difficult to say. Wish it was the same person in both pics  . I for one do not know what to say. |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on May 16, 2011 5:40:16 GMT -5
You are right so far.
Regarding the pics on the left, look in the eyes.
|
|
|
|
Post by goro on May 16, 2011 15:37:22 GMT -5
Okay, this is just a few thoughts I have about these pics.
In the first black and white photo on the top left, he has a wider bulb to the nose than the man pictured to his right in the colored photograph. That black and white Feorge on the top left also to me has more almond shaped eyes than the other guy.
In the second set of photos, to me it looks like there is a pretty close match between the black and white photo and the colored photo.
Was the second black and white guy an early replacement who was being shopped in as an ocasional stunt double or performance double while the "real" George (assuming the top left black and white pic is the original George) was still around? And then gradually that replacement took over all public appearances and you didn't see the other one around much anymore?
Problem is, I think that the guy in the top right color photo is George/Feorge around the time he had that brief 1980's career resurgence with that catchy tune "I've Got My Mind Set On You" or whatever it was called -- when he was the Travelling Willburies or whatever.
So are we seeing TWO replacements who have swapped out the role of George both dating back to the Beatles golden era and up until the 1980's/90s?
Very weird!
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on May 25, 2011 9:00:40 GMT -5
It appears as though there were two men who appeared to be "George Harrison" as early as the "Hamburg" era of Beatle-dom. Because the two b&w pics look like two different men, who resemble each other closely. Not the same men. So one of those b&w pics, my opinion is the top left was the true George Harrison, and the bottom left was the imposter. And the color pics are those men in later years.
It looks to me that the real George Harrison lived longer than the true other Beatles had. It looks as if they took the real George out of circulation for a time while using the fake George, and then using the real George in the latter part of the 60's and then in the late 70's and early 80's. And then using the fake George in the latter part in the "life" of George Harrison image.
Because when I see pics of Dhani, I see the real George, and not the look a like. So this tells me that the real George lived beyond the late 60's and into the 80's.
Never thought of this situation until looking at these pics. George was used interchangeably.
Still wondering if John's image had been piddled with in the same manner, the real John, a fake Lennon, and a resurgence with the real Lennon, and then the imposter was used until they took out the life form we knew of as "John Lennon". Because the latter 60's seemed like a fake Lennon, but times in the 70's it seemed like the real John was appearing, but just a weathered and worn self.
Very strange to use them interchanging during different periods of the "life"....rather than just having one replacement for the duration, as Bill/Faul has been used.
Perhaps they decided one man to play "Paul" that we know as "Bill/Faul" and the others used interchanging them...
Strange procedures...but we are not talking about people with "normal" human functions and reasoning....those who are in control of such manipulations have no scruples or human reasoning...they have no feelings of humanity..they just have power and want to control the world...like those images of "mad scientists" we had seen depicted in those hideous "B" sci fi flicks of the 50's and early 60's.
|
|
|
|
Post by goro on May 25, 2011 9:36:22 GMT -5
It appears as though there were two men who appeared to be "George Harrison" as early as the "Hamburg" era of Beatle-dom. Because the two b&w pics look like two different men, who resemble each other closely. Not the same men. So one of those b&w pics, my opinion is the top left was the true George Harrison, and the bottom left was the imposter. And the color pics are those men in later years. It looks to me that the real George Harrison lived longer than the true other Beatles had. It looks as if they took the real George out of circulation for a time while using the fake George, and then using the real George in the latter part of the 60's and then in the late 70's and early 80's. And then using the fake George in the latter part in the "life" of George Harrison image. Because when I see pics of Dhani, I see the real George, and not the look a like. So this tells me that the real George lived beyond the late 60's and into the 80's. Never thought of this situation until looking at these pics. George was used interchangeably. Still wondering if John's image had been piddled with in the same manner, the real John, a fake Lennon, and a resurgence with the real Lennon, and then the imposter was used until they took out the life form we knew of as "John Lennon". Because the latter 60's seemed like a fake Lennon, but times in the 70's it seemed like the real John was appearing, but just a weathered and worn self. Very strange to use them interchanging during different periods of the "life"....rather than just having one replacement for the duration, as Bill/Faul has been used. Perhaps they decided one man to play "Paul" that we know as "Bill/Faul" and the others used interchanging them... Strange procedures...but we are not talking about people with "normal" human functions and reasoning....those who are in control of such manipulations have no scruples or human reasoning...they have no feelings of humanity..they just have power and want to control the world...like those images of "mad scientists" we had seen depicted in those hideous "B" sci fi flicks of the 50's and early 60's. I think you're right about all of this. Strange how a YOUNG Feorge was used intermittently with the young "real" George - I still have to wrap my brains around this because the pics so clearly show that this was happening. |
|
|
|
Post by brownn on May 26, 2011 2:10:15 GMT -5
Paul's vocals would have been the most difficult to imitate, but with work someone with skill could adapt to Harrison, Lennon's and certainly Ringo's vocals. But the harmony was never the same. Yeah.. the vocals of any person isn't easy to imitate, but always there is someone that have a voice like another person and definitely isn't difficult for a big label to search it. So, just remember Klaatu... (i'm not saying that they were the beatles) one of the voices is almost exact to Macca's vocals after 1967 and I could swear that the vocals for Faul were the same as occupied for Klaatu .. but.. who really knows |
|
Besides, the person singing sounds like an American doing an English accent ("lak I knoo that it should" 
. I for one do not know what to say.