|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 13, 2011 18:53:00 GMT -5
What does the Motto mean? Love is all you need...  ? LOL A Maltese Cross??? Is he a member of the Knights of Malta? Okay, I'm being a bit insane....I plead insanity... |
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Apr 13, 2011 19:15:08 GMT -5
The thing about George Martin is which one? There are pics somewhere on here of THREE George Martins. Maybe another forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 15, 2011 20:08:30 GMT -5
I don't know if the replacing of George Martin was here or PID Miss Him....but it's a curious thing about him. When I see him, I can't help but think he reminds me of a member of the Windsor royal family. I'm not saying he looks exactly like the Windsors, but puts me in mind of them. He has been "knighted", so he's part of the Illuminati or else the Crown wouldn't have given the title "sir" or "dame".
He was more than a "producer" of their music. I have to wonder if some of the creative "genius" that has been attributed to Lennon/Mc Cartney was really Martin's creations? I know that many Beatle fans get very, very irate when mentioning the idea that the "Fab Four" were these wonderful "gods" and they being musical geniuses. Sometimes these myths have to be destroyed.
This man was used to orchestrate the music that was used to mold a generation and a mindset. He may have very well been a "handler" or programmer of the Fab Faux , what we have been deluded to think was the Fab Four.
|
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Apr 16, 2011 13:23:15 GMT -5
The thing about the Beatles is that people have claimed that EVERYTHING they supposedly wrote was NOT written by them but a group of songwriters.Since just about EVERYTHING else about the Beatles was a lie it is hard not to reach that same conclusion.Up untill 1967 they had a lot more consistant cohesive sound that was not nearly so full of "clues" and the volcals blended so much better. That is why I like pre 67 Beatles so much more. But I do love "I am the Walrus" which could tell the whole story but have heard so many interpretatios of that song don't know what to think,lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on May 19, 2011 20:07:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on May 22, 2011 16:45:50 GMT -5
 Ringo: "I am the last remaining Beatle." Repeat: "I am the last remaining Beatle." plasticmacca.blogspot.com/2011/05/ringo-last-remaining-beatle.htmlIn this article excerpted below, Ringo Starr claims to be the last remaining Beatle. It is played off as a "joke," but even Ringo admits there is an "element of truth to it." As followers of this blog know, it has been proven by forensic evidence that Paul McCartney was replaced circa 1966. How many hints do these people need to drop before people start thinking *maybe* there is something to PID? Please, read between the lines. Ringo said he was the last remaining Beatle not once, but *twice* in the same article - just in case you didn't catch it the first time. 'Paul likes to think he's the only remaining Beatle': Ringo Starr on why the world's most famous band was lucky to have him By COLE MORETON Last updated at 10:00 PM on 21st May 2011 ... ‘You all know that the only person round this table who can go is me. I was in the biggest rock ’n’ roll band in the history of music… I am the last remaining Beatle.’ ... The best jokes are based on truth... ‘There is an element of truth in it,’ Ringo says, before pausing for thought. ‘But I think it’s people on the outside who perceive Paul as thinking he’s the only one left. Actually, it’s me. I am the last remaining Beatle.’ ... [M]aybe Ringo is the one who has stayed closest to the original spirit of the Beatles... |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on May 23, 2011 3:09:54 GMT -5
Its just another FINGO...
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Jun 8, 2011 13:03:42 GMT -5
"The Last Testament of George Harrison" disinfo trash is gaining traction - just to get everyone off track - again - focusing on the clues rather than the forensic proof of PWR.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jun 8, 2011 20:28:02 GMT -5
I think disinfo is right. But that's how it works, if you can't stop something from coming out, you can re-direct it to another direction.
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 9, 2011 15:21:08 GMT -5
"The Last Testament of George Harrison" disinfo trash is gaining traction - just to get everyone off track - again - focusing on the clues rather than the forensic proof of PWR. They must be concerned about the growing awareness which is good for us. |
|
|
|
Post by brownn on Jun 18, 2011 1:52:53 GMT -5
The one, true, original Paul McCartney  The first Paul McCartney clone. Notice the bigger ears and different shaped chin  At the risk of playing devil's advocate, what's the say the first photo has not been tampered with? To my eyes, the first pic looks like a younger version of the post 1966 McCartney. This makes me think it may have been altered to make it look more 'faul-like'. Here's Faul in 1968  To me, the eyes in this photo look identical to the first photo in your post. This makes me think that some photos of the original Paul have been altered to make then have Faul-like features. In my very humble opinion, the Paul in the 2nd photo of your post, is actually the original. I totally agree with you; The first photo is altered, the second shows the real paul. This is the one and true James Paul McCartney (Here with The Quarrymen 1957)  This is Faul, I don't know if this is the same person we actually know as Macca; but definitely this is not James PaulMcCartney.. and it seems that in the first two pics has been used the same montage but with different clothes and hairstyles.  |
|
|
|
Post by goro on Jun 18, 2011 14:16:44 GMT -5
I'm always puzzled by the droopy eye thing. Various sources have said that Paul had a condition that when he was tired his one eye would droop. But the second photo in these three you just posted isn't just showing a droopy eye - the eyes are so uneven as to appear tampered with in the photo - to me anyway. Faul has been in the news a lot lately - coming out with a yet another album or concert tour or something, not to mention the new engagement to some woman. I did stumble on one quote the other day where he was being interviewed and talked about how fun it was to revisit old memories in creating his latest stuff. Whose memories are those, Faul? Are you looking at them on old home movies from the real Paul? Or were you installed with a new memory chip?  |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 18, 2011 14:43:50 GMT -5
Faul has been in the news a lot lately - coming out with a yet another album or concert tour or something, not to mention the new engagement to some woman. I did stumble on one quote the other day where he was being interviewed and talked about how fun it was to revisit old memories in creating his latest stuff. Whose memories are those, Faul? Are you looking at them on old home movies from the real Paul? Or were you installed with a new memory chip? Enuff to remember the name of his latest album: MEMORY ALMOST FULL. Rings all bells I believe. |
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Jun 19, 2011 1:31:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 22, 2011 22:53:06 GMT -5
Paul slept with his eyes open?
|
|
? LOL
