|
Post by lucy on Apr 14, 2010 19:14:14 GMT -5
Excellent observation about the hair swirl...never thought of that one...
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Apr 14, 2010 21:18:17 GMT -5
Yes, that is good!
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 15, 2010 22:41:54 GMT -5
It shows that there is no way that Bill is the real Paul, and far from being a clone.
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 16, 2010 13:01:23 GMT -5
(from Anonymous)
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 18, 2010 12:02:25 GMT -5
Another from Anonymous:
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Apr 18, 2010 12:28:52 GMT -5
It shows that there is no way that Bill is the real Paul, and far from being a clone. Yes, far from being a clone. What we've seen here on this forum over the last few years with all of the celebrity replacements shows that Faul is actually one of the worst doubles there is out there. It is quite easy to see the differences between him and Paul.
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 18, 2010 15:00:44 GMT -5
There's also a big difference in the noses on that comp. It looks like Faul's nose got rounded off.
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 18, 2010 23:29:38 GMT -5
From Anon:
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 19, 2010 22:32:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by GetSmart on Apr 22, 2010 3:05:41 GMT -5
Yes, far from being a clone. What we've seen here on this forum over the last few years with all of the celebrity replacements shows that Faul is actually one of the worst doubles there is out there. It is quite easy to see the differences between him and Paul. Hi The Mask, Having checked out a few clones in my day, this fellow sure isn't anything like one... unless they cloned Faul 1 and now we've got Faul 2 ? Faul being one of the worst doubles actually has its advantages, when we go about the unwieldy task of revealing to others the presence of Doppelgangers: it reveals in broad daylight the presence of organized web-gangs of disinformation operatives. It also exemplifies their counter-propaganda tactics which become apparent for all to see - - obvious ill will is glaring in the face of flagrant visual and scientific evidence. We've battled against them in the David Icke forum, and they were like a hornet nest swarming at anyone suggesting Paul was in any way different from his tacky vaudeville replacement job. This shows that the task may be both easier and more difficult, when we consider that their rear guard was marshaled behind Sir Paul, but that he would be the easiest of all Doppels to debunk. This goes to show that those aware of Doubles would do well to engage further efforts, not just into recognizing their presence as tainted substitutes for the real thing, but much more importantly to denounce the probable assassination of innocent victims of the Music, Media, Hollywood murder and replacement program. This means taking on some pretty nasty characters in the persons of CIA, MI-5 and other agencies which are partially complicit in this program. However, it appears that it might only be fringe components of those agencies which are directly involved, and that denouncing these agencies' involvement with credible evidence and demonstrative logic might put them in danger within their own organizations as well as respective to others. I shall take the example of a CIA Director who is part of the satanic Illuminati abduction of celebrities, for ritual sacrifice, and who provides the services from kidnapping to mind controlled replacement by a clone or a double. All it takes is ONE person in the Military to become aware of this fact, someone with access to special forces commandos, to take him and his network out. It would be their patriotic duty, sworn by allegiance to their nation, to remove by any means those using their high functions as protectors of the State for purposes of the most vile criminal acts. So while we may not be in a position to directly act against what seems like impossible odds given the culprits have in their employ countless contract assassins and cover up agents, they are themselves far more vulnerable that you know. So it is all the more important to step up the pressure, concentrating if possible on one celebrity at a time or a related series of ReplaCIAments in order to gradually awaken public opinion to the monstrosity which lurks behind their government agencies and their power elite. This board is tops for revealing to people with eyes wide open what is going on. A different tack should be found for revealing the Truth to those with Eyes Wide Shut.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 22, 2010 15:54:39 GMT -5
You would think if they are going to have a "knock off" Mc Cartney, they would have done a better job...
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 22, 2010 21:22:03 GMT -5
So it is all the more important to step up the pressure, concentrating if possible on one celebrity at a time or a related series of ReplaCIAments in order to gradually awaken public opinion to the monstrosity which lurks behind their government agencies and their power elite. I guess no one will be surprised that I think Paul McCartney is the one to focus on. He is perhaps the best known case of CIAlebrity replacement, plus his double is bad enough for many people to be able to spot the differences.
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 23, 2010 14:50:59 GMT -5
From Anon:
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 23, 2010 19:44:46 GMT -5
Man, he really did let his face grow long....since he's become "Faul".
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 24, 2010 13:24:19 GMT -5
Why sponsor a Paul McCartney Photoshop Pictures Contest? Why? Are there Photoshop contests for other CIAlebrities I'm not aware of? Is this part of the conditioning to see the impostor as the real deal? Stick a picture of old Faul in w/ the young Beatles & he's suddenly one of the lads? In truth, the guy sticks out like a sore thumb. One of these kids does not belong!
|
|