|
|
Post by lostworld on Aug 24, 2009 10:41:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Aug 24, 2009 10:45:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Aug 24, 2009 10:47:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Aug 24, 2009 10:48:22 GMT -5
Megan in pics with pedophilia theme. The sexualized child playing with her furry toys in bed...   Notice what the text to "the child" says: ”I have the libido of a 15-year-old boy - my sex drive is so high"  |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Aug 24, 2009 11:12:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Aug 24, 2009 12:36:41 GMT -5
 At the facial transformations, doesn't even look like the same girl! I can't even tell exactly what they did to her! And again, it shows how expert their methods are now. Such a profound facial transformation and no scars, no nerve damage....Yet other celebs have scarring and so on. Priscilla Presley being an example. Someone really wanted the perfect 'speciman' with Megan. And again I ask, why her? She was a pretty average looking chick before all the changes. There must be something ELSE special about her that we can't see. Either she is a " hat" (http://www.tmz.com/2009/07/09/reincarnated-woman-sues-hefner-for-3-billion/6) , or a synthetic and they enjoy showing off their workmanship which is why she's pushed so hard on the public..
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Aug 24, 2009 13:07:24 GMT -5
At the facial transformations, doesn't even look like the same girl! I can't even tell exactly what they did to her! Hi Sabrina  I can't tell what they did to her either...  Yes, there are the classic plastic surgery arguments but the whole girl is just plain weird. And those empty eyes... "Just" mindcontrol, or something else?  And again, it shows how expert their methods are now. Such a profound facial transformation and no scars, no nerve damage....Yet other celebs have scarring and so on. Priscilla Presley being an example. Yes, that's an interesting observation. Some end up totally butchered (and they might not have done THAT many operations after all) and some has "everything" changed like Megan and look like this...? Something's up. She was a pretty average looking chick before all the changes. There must be something ELSE special about her that we can't see. Either she is a " hat" (http://www.tmz.com/2009/07/09/reincarnated-woman-sues-hefner-for-3-billion/6) , or a synthetic and they enjoy showing off their workmanship which is why she's pushed so hard on the public.. . Yes, there was nothing special about Megan at all IMO. But we know how they love to show their symbolism and MK'd stars, of course they would love to front a perfected synthetic all they can, maybe that's why she has all that success now... |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Aug 24, 2009 17:34:11 GMT -5
I'd say she was replaced.
The "look" seems to change right around the movie Transformers(2007). She was replaced right before that in 2006, perhaps that summer. The show Hope & Faith(2004-2006) had just been cancelled and filming for Transformers would have to start soon because it was released in July of 2007. Transformers is known as her breakout role, which is the same time period her look changed. She began dating Brian Austin Green in November of 2006. The timing fits perfectly.
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Aug 24, 2009 19:20:54 GMT -5
I'd say she was replaced. The "look" seems to change right around the movie Transformers(2007). She was replaced right before that in 2006, perhaps that summer. The show Hope & Faith(2004-2006) had just been cancelled and filming for Transformers would have to start soon because it was released in July of 2007. Transformers is known as her breakout role, which is the same time period her look changed. She began dating Brian Austin Green in November of 2006. The timing fits perfectly. Hi the Mask and thanks for that info... Yeah, the timing is interesting indeed. The question is what she was replaced by? A human or something else...? Wouldn't it be such an inside joke to the Elite to introduce their latest "synthetic engineering success" to the public in a movie called "Transformers" Just a theory... |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Aug 24, 2009 19:22:04 GMT -5
I agree. She looks heavily programmed.
Btw, regarding her tatoo, Stewart Swerdlow says there is a programming called butterfly programming. I wonder if there is a significance there.
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Aug 24, 2009 19:57:05 GMT -5
"Monarch" mind control programming is named after the butterfly
of the same name. That insect passes learned information onto
its offspring. This is the idea behind generational programming
within the illuminati cult.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Aug 25, 2009 4:44:26 GMT -5
Thanks for the clarification sherlok. No doubt she is a sexual icon for the Illuminati...a role the original Megan probably wouldn't take. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Aug 25, 2009 5:09:59 GMT -5
Excellent work, lostie, glad u posted it on PID forum too.
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Aug 25, 2009 6:49:09 GMT -5
Excellent work, lostie, glad u posted it on PID forum too. Thanks Artemis, yeah I must be better in spreading the word and not just post this on Icke. Many of you are there too, but still... It's good if it's posted "everywhere". |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Aug 25, 2009 6:58:10 GMT -5
I agree. She looks heavily programmed. Btw, regarding her tatoo, Stewart Swerdlow says there is a programming called butterfly programming. I wonder if there is a significance there. I saw that you already got an answer from Sherlok but if you want more info on this there's plenty on my Stepford thread on Icke... If anyone of you want any more info about MK symbolism just PM and I'll send you further info, links to Stepford posts etc. I already have a "best of" compilation, that I've posted to others who has contacted me so there really is no problem. PM me here, on PID or on Icke and I'll post it to you right away. It's important to know about their symbolism, how they use it and what it looks like. You'll see that it's really everywhere and that it's all connected. Mind control is THE big agenda and the replacements is a subcategory in this... it's all connected so that's why the symbolism is so important to have knowledge of.
Once you'll have the basic knowledge you'll see how these things are no coincidence and how it's all connected and a part of their agenda. post from Armoured Amazon on IckeThe name MONARCH is not necessarily defined within the context of royal nobility, but rather refers to the monarch butterfly. When a person is undergoing trauma induced by electroshock, a feeling of light-headedness is evidenced; as if one is floating or fluttering like a butterfly. There is also a symbolic representation pertaining to the transformation or metamorphosis of this beautiful insect: from a caterpillar to a cocoon (dormancy, inactivity ), to a butterfly (new creation) which will return to its point of origin. Such is the migratory pattern that makes this species unique. Occultic symbolism may give additional insight into the true meaning Psyche is the word for both “soul” and “butterfly” coming from the belief that human souls become butterflies while searching for a new reincarnation. [10] Some ancient mystical groups, such as the Gnostics, saw the butterfly as a symbol of corrupt flesh. The “Angel of Death” (remember Mengele?) in Gnostic art works was portrayed crushing the butterfly.[11] A marionette is a puppet that is attached to strings and is controlled by the puppet master, hence MONARCH programming is also referred to as the “Marionette Syndrome.” “Imperial Conditioning” is another term used, while some mental health therapists know it as “Conditioned Stimulus Response Sequences.” Project MONARCH could be best described as a form of structured dissociation and occultic integration, in order to compartmentalize the mind into multiple personalities within a systematic framework. During this process, a Satanic ritual, usually including Cabalistic mysticism, is performed with the purpose of attaching a particular demon or group of demons to the corresponding alter(s). Of course, most skeptics would view this as simply a means to enhance trauma within the victim, negating any irrational belief that demonic possession actually occurs. www.whale.to/b/patton.html |
|
