|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 27, 2010 7:06:38 GMT -5
Notice the scar/crease next to her temple, reminds me of FANGELINA's "reptilian" pic that could be seen a few months ago. Hide the traces of ur new face better, FEGAN... And in case u say its a vein there, no it isnt. Its folded skin, dammit...  |
|
|
|
Post by sebastian on Jun 27, 2010 10:19:45 GMT -5
Notice the scar/crease next to her temple, reminds me of FANGELINA's "reptilian" pic that could be seen a few months ago. Hide the traces of ur new face better, FEGAN... And in case u say its a vein there, no it isnt. Its folded skin, dammit... Its a vein. Simple as that. Google up an anatomy book. Especially pale skin shows those veins. All of the starlets have their own photoshop departments now. Photo evidence is useless, stop posting it. |
|
|
|
Post by sebastian on Jun 27, 2010 10:24:02 GMT -5
Notice the scar/crease next to her temple, reminds me of FANGELINA's "reptilian" pic that could be seen a few months ago. Hide the traces of ur new face better, FEGAN... And in case u say its a vein there, no it isnt. Its folded skin, dammit... I would rather debate about whether those boobs are photoshopped or doctored or both. They change their cup size depending on the season, then the photoshop guys change them depending on where the picture gets published. |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jun 27, 2010 14:34:06 GMT -5
Photo evidence is useless, stop posting it. Photo evidence is very useful. Please stop telling other members what to do. |
|
|
|
Post by sebastian on Jun 27, 2010 15:18:03 GMT -5
Photo evidence is useless, stop posting it. Photo evidence is very useful. Please stop telling other members what to do. Well sorry about the tone, but isolated pictures don't prove anything. I'm just frustrated with the threads in this forum and some others. Unless you work 24/7 on spotting impostors, plowing through isolated pictures in random order is kind of wasting time, especially when it turns out there's nothing special. If you have series of pictures with dates of an impostor and the real person then there's something to start looking at. But even then it seems that in only a fraction of cases there's been identity manipulation of some sort involved. At least the last 3 persons I looked into in detail that were mentioned in the forums are totally clean. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 27, 2010 15:32:40 GMT -5
We are also frustrated when trolls like u try to mess up everything. Btw, that "vein" doesnt appear in all her pics. Dont u find this strange? Of course u dont, its us who are nutty.
|
|
|
|
Post by sebastian on Jun 27, 2010 15:55:41 GMT -5
We are also frustrated when trolls like u try to mess up everything. A troll is someone who pisses off people for fun. Call me a sceptic if you want to call names. I just pointed out that as a method looking at isolated pictures don't get you anywhere. If you want to know the truth about identity manipulation, it's an ancient espionage technique that's still being used. Bram Stoker's last book "Famous Impostors" is interesting, just found about it. www.bramstoker.org/nonfic/impostors.htmlIt seems that photographs were exactly the thing that ruined using impostors, since before photographs people didn't know what the rulers looked like and they were often replaced. It's too expensive to fake every picture and now every video. Not impossible, but ridiculously expensive and risky. Paul might have been the last attempt at straight-up replacements. And a failed one, since by 1969 everyone seemed to know the truth about the thing and now the fake Paul is just an elephant. Everyone who knows something knows that he's a fake, so the old style impostor replacements don't work anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 27, 2010 15:58:23 GMT -5
Go back to sleep, dude, is all I can tell u.
|
|
|
|
Post by sebastian on Jun 27, 2010 16:35:06 GMT -5
Go back to sleep, dude, is all I can tell u. Sheesh. Its the people that are told the truth that get angry, not the ones exposing it. Celebrity replacements are not as common as you're implying. A vein not photoshopped out of a press picture does not count as solid evidence. If you think it does, you're mistaken. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 29, 2010 3:38:17 GMT -5
U tell "sheesh" to ur mother, not to me, brainwashed kid, ok?
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 29, 2010 3:38:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jun 29, 2010 8:28:21 GMT -5
^Well he originally hooked up with her first double imo. From imdb.com: Engaged to Brian Austin Green from November 2006 until February 2009 when they called off their engagement. They then got back together in April 2009.Transformers(2007) was released in July of 07 which means they must have filmed it in 2006, probably mid-2006. So she was engaged to Brian Austin Green after a short period of time.  I think it's safe to say that many Hollywood marriages are arranged or at least manipulated from behind the scenes, i.e. agents "introducing" actors to other actors, strongly "recommending" unions, etc. Perhaps Green knew Fegan 1 before she officially became 'Megan Fox'. But to answer your question artemis, I think Brian Austin Green has to know that his girlfriend is another double. What will probably happen is that they will get married or stay engaged for awhile and then break up, probably as some sort of "agreement" he makes with his superiors to make the general public buy the idea that Fegan 1 and Fegan 2 are the same person, that is, this celebrity known as Megan Fox. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 29, 2010 8:37:37 GMT -5
True, u hit the point. And as I said many times in showbizz, Hollywood especially one cant talk about love relationships, be them official or not. Its all about re/programming, handling, fame, power and other benefits like that. Of course it doesnt go for everybody out there, but lets face it, its the main rule in their world. And under some disguises in ours too. Enuff to think of FOM FRUISE who is sick of so many contracts with his "girlfriends", "fiancees" and "wives". MIMI ROGERS had a contract with him, CHER, NICOLE&FICOLE, PENELOPE CRUZ and now this new victim of his, KATIE HOLMES... Its a miracle how much KATIE can take, really. No suicide attempt, not even a little one? Only future can tell us.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 1, 2010 13:44:09 GMT -5
There was a tabloid at the market last week that showed the "plastic" surgery of Megan Fox...another way of explaining away why celebs look to freakish lately.
Duh....tell us they had plastic surgery and pat us on the head and expect us to go back to our braindead existence of watching Dr. Oz and Dr Phil for our medical advice...
Pulease....
Even if we are not debating the "vein" or no vein...the faces show something stark...she's starting to look like a mutation of Catherine Zeta Jones with abnormal lips...
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Aug 7, 2010 4:48:38 GMT -5
|
|
I think it's safe to say that many Hollywood marriages are arranged or at least manipulated from behind the scenes, i.e. agents "introducing" actors to other actors, strongly "recommending" unions, etc. Perhaps Green knew Fegan 1 before she officially became 'Megan Fox'.