|
Post by msmoonlite on Oct 14, 2010 19:19:26 GMT -5
>>>>>> Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Oct 15, 2010 15:29:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Oct 15, 2010 16:43:41 GMT -5
Brenda?
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Oct 24, 2010 11:41:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Oct 31, 2010 23:25:19 GMT -5
Who is this? Mick Jagger and Bob Geldoff's love child??? Makes you wonder if the powers that be and take DNA from two males and create a strange offspring???
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Dec 22, 2010 18:25:30 GMT -5
web page now gone? try the above link....
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Dec 29, 2010 10:38:43 GMT -5
First I said Mick was replaced in 1974 or 1975 but I now think he was also replaced long before that. The Illuminati make sure that the original never achieves mega fame. It's always a replacement who does.The famous "Mick Jagger" aka Mick's first double The original Mick Jagger As Tears Go By, the original version(probably sung by the original Mick) As Tears Go By sung by the first Fick on The Ed Sullivan Show in 1964. The original Mick was already replaced by this time. Notice the difference in the voice. Fick can't reach the same note that Mick did.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Dec 29, 2010 10:46:31 GMT -5
Good one.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 29, 2010 13:01:36 GMT -5
Excellent!
The real Mick, which is odd, had a long thin face, usually we say about replacements having the long thin face, but the fake Mick that I've seen lately has a squarer jawline, slits for eyes, rather than the big round eyes of the real Mick, and the recent Fick does not have the big lips like the real Mick had. Look at the difference from the real full lips, to the silicon lips injections of the Fick pictured at the top of The Mask's post...
Amazing find....
|
|
|
Post by goro on Dec 29, 2010 13:11:16 GMT -5
Excellent, Mask!
"The Illuminati make sure that the original never achieves mega fame. It's always a replacement who does."
This is the part I always have a hard time thinking about because it sure does make my brain hurt! The idea that someone who is an unknown, perhaps just barely into a career in music, modelling, acting, sports, etc. is replaced and then manipulated into a "brand" even before they're famous......makes sense from an energy/enslavement standpoint because then they could be controlled every step of the way....but perhaps some break down, have programming problems, become rebellious, fall into much too deep drug addiction and become unusable (Lindsay Lohan, etc) ....and then we see multiple replacements or clones throughout the "career" of that person. Crazy but so true!
|
|
|
Post by treegenus on Dec 29, 2010 14:45:25 GMT -5
Excellent, Mask! "The Illuminati make sure that the original never achieves mega fame. It's always a replacement who does." The idea that someone who is an unknown, perhaps just barely into a career in music, modelling, acting, sports, etc. is replaced and then manipulated into a "brand" even before they're famous......makes sense from an energy/enslavement standpoint because then they could be controlled every step of the way....but perhaps some break down, have programming problems, become rebellious, fall into much too deep drug addiction and become unusable (Lindsay Lohan, etc) ....and then we see multiple replacements or clones throughout the "career" of that person. Crazy but so true! Perhaps that's why they have started with MKing the tiny little offspring of celebrities (and from teh womb too, I'm told) so that they will never have the chance to "think" that something is wrong and rebel like the celebrity generation's children might have done previously. All the Celebrity Kids you see now in the media are being totally immersed in this insanity without a clue that they are existing in their one point perspective matrix world.
|
|
|
Post by superman on Dec 29, 2010 16:55:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 9, 2012 4:05:30 GMT -5
"Their babies would have the perfect pout! 'Mick Jagger pursued romance with Angelina Jolie' claims new book
If they had ended up together, their children would have been the talking point on everyone’s lips.
But according to a new novel, Angelina Jolie turned down anything serious with her pouty male equivalent.
The actress – who appeared in the Rolling Stones’ Anybody Seen My Baby music video in 1997 - was allegedly pursued by the rocker whilst he was still married to supermodel Jerry Hall.
In the book by Christopher Andersen, anecdotes claim that Jolie’s mother Marcheline Bertrand was eager for the musician to partner up with her daughter.
This despite Mick only being four years younger than Angelina's thespian father John Voight.
Similarly, Angelina was married to Trainspotting actor Johnny Lee Miller however was rumoured to be enjoying an affair with screen star Timothy Hutton.
Family friend Lauren Taines stated: ‘Marche loved Mick for Angie. She felt that he could teach her about fame and how to handle it.”
Even though Angelina had grown up with fame in her blood, she was only starting out in the industry herself.
After accepting the music video job she is said to have gone on a foul-mouthed rant as she played a stripper on the set.
She screamed at the director: ‘I can’t f***ing sing, and I can’t f***ing dance! What the f*** am I doing here?’
Being only 23 years old at the time, Jolie had just portrayed troubled model Gia Carangi in a TV film of the same name.
In the book by Anderson, the part – where her character died of AIDS at 26 and was addicted to heroin - is said to have left her physically and emotionally drained.
Akin to her character, short-haired Jolie was abusing drugs at the time and was a fan of tattoos.
An excerpt reads: 'Then, clad in a fur coat opened to reveal a gold lamé bustier beneath, Angelina brought traffic to a standstill as she strolled down a midtown street with Mick in hot pursuit.'
Angelina was spotted leaving Sarajevo, Bosnia today via a private jet as where her directorial debut film was made."
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 17, 2012 22:10:51 GMT -5
If there was a lovechild from that pair....the lips...ugh....the lips....
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 30, 2013 5:48:53 GMT -5
"Stones frontman looks exhausted after 'secret' concert in Los Angeles They used to say rock’n’roll keeps you young. Not any more, apparently. After barely ageing a day in half a century of touring, it seems Sir Mick Jagger is finally feeling his years. The 69-year-old looked exhausted after his latest gig with The Rolling Stones as the band prepare for the latest leg of their world tour. Leaving the stage with his entourage, he appeared haggard and drawn with sunken cheeks and a dazed look in his eyes. Despite his carefully dyed hair and casual apparel, the singer’s true age was betrayed by the lines in his face and neck. Sir Mick and his band mates gave a surprise 90-minute concert at a small club in Los Angeles on Saturday (27) ahead of their first US stadium appearance on Friday. The 14-song set was watched by Hollywood star Johnny Depp and actress Amanda Heard, as well as fellow celebrities Owen Wilson and Bruce Willis. It ended with rousing renditions of the band’s classic hits Brown Sugar and Jumpin’ Jack Flash. But it appears the energetic routine took it out of the band’s lead singer. Sir Mick is normally used to putting other men his age to shame. A yoga-fanatic, he exercises regularly with a personal trainer and runs up to eight miles in every training session. He also tries to fend off the years by going to bed at 11pm every night, using a range of expensive facial creams and drinking special wheatgrass smoothies The star weighs just 10stone and still fits in the 28in jeans he wore as a youngster. While on tour, he cuts back on his exercise regime but warms up on a treadmill before going onstage. In a recent interview, he said: ‘I think I’ve been lucky with my genes, but I carefully look after my body and mind.’ Describing his technique for unwinding post-performance, he said: ‘It’s too debilitating to drink a lot, so I use other relaxation techniques,’ he says. ‘I sit on my own, calm down, take stock.’ "
|
|