|
|
Post by The Mask on Dec 23, 2010 19:30:18 GMT -5
Is this the same man....  .....as this man?  |
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Dec 23, 2010 21:14:29 GMT -5
^ Appears to be a different head shape & eyebrows. The ears on the bottom are not Paul's ears. The lips & the nose appear to be Paul's, though. My guess is that the bottom is a combo of Paul & Faul.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Dec 24, 2010 5:56:29 GMT -5
Looks like I have to break my vow, lol. Shoot me, but I dont think PAUL was replaced before the "great" year 1966. IMO this pic with him as a teen was FAUL-ified/tampered with. And WTF "PAUL" in the last pic looks much much older, come on... U dont need to have eagle eyes to notice that. Nothing can stop "them" right? Its a goddamm common practice after all and u know it.
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Dec 24, 2010 9:53:40 GMT -5
Looks to me like the lower pic is just a stretched image: Look what happens when I "squash" it a little in PhotoShop:  |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Dec 24, 2010 10:06:14 GMT -5
Ha, ha, lolz, Sherlok! Good one...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Dec 24, 2010 11:05:39 GMT -5
I belive the pic IS stretched.
But that doesn't explain the difference in the ears, chin, eyes and nose.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Dec 24, 2010 12:00:39 GMT -5
As I said, the pic was not only stretched, but also FAUL-ified, which explains those differences.
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Dec 25, 2010 5:00:44 GMT -5
What is that "scar" on the chin/cheek? Maybe that's a seam where they stuck different images together? The graininess of the photo helps hide some imperfections... I agree it's Faulsified. |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Dec 25, 2010 9:16:32 GMT -5
So do you think the ears have also been made smaller?
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Dec 25, 2010 14:59:26 GMT -5
I don't think they're Paul's ears...  And definitely not his eyebrows... or his scar. |
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 7, 2011 22:13:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 7, 2011 22:34:12 GMT -5
August 29, 1959: The Quarrymen at The Casbah Club, Liverpool. The real John Lennon, James Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Pete Best? This is described as the first published photo of John and Paul together. www.samleach.com/album/beatles_cavern.jpg |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jan 8, 2011 1:33:16 GMT -5
Feorge, Faul and Fohn imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by bzzerk on Jan 8, 2011 3:18:47 GMT -5
Feorge, Faul and Fohn imo. Agreed, again this photo looks like it may have been tampered with to give Paul and John, Faul and Fohn-like qualities. It's pretty sad but it's getting harder and harder to find genuine photos of the originals. 45 years on and 'they' are still trying to perpetuate the massive lie and deception. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jan 8, 2011 6:49:39 GMT -5
Feorge, Faul and Fohn imo. Agreed, again this photo looks like it may have been tampered with to give Paul and John, Faul and Fohn-like qualities. It's pretty sad but it's getting harder and harder to find genuine photos of the originals. 45 years on and 'they' are still trying to perpetuate the massive lie and deception. Agreed again, tampered pics. |
|
