|
|
Post by sherlok on Oct 13, 2010 23:56:46 GMT -5
Yes, Fohn was an early model of replacement. They've vastly improved them since then. Some even have brains now.  |
|
|
|
Post by msmoonlite on Oct 18, 2010 20:16:17 GMT -5
Linda and Paul McCartney not as happy as they seemed? www.gossiprocks.com/forum/gossip-archive/29414-linda-paul-mccartney-not-happy-they-seemed.html... Although he found Paul (sic) charming and charismatic, Mr Cox claimed the star had 'a darker side and could be very controlling... "Also on that walk, he kept talking about John Lennon in the present tense. It was John says this and John thinks that. Very weird. And he spoke about that reference to The Beatles being more famous than Jesus. He said, 'Do you realise how much power we could have had if we'd gone to the dark side?' ... Mr Cox admitted: "I didn't warm to Paul. There was an awful coldness about him. His eyes were deader than any I had ever seen... For all his wealth and celebrity, Mr Cox asserts that Paul was 'frustrated'. Even Linda, he says, referred to him as 'such a frustrated man', though enigmatically she didn't say why... "I said, 'I have been waiting for hours Paul,' and he replied that he was Paul McCartney and not to forget it. "I said, 'I know you are, Paul. There's only ever one Paul McCartney, isn't there?' ... Thanks for the link. I don't think I've ever read anything quite as revealing about Linda. Poor Faul, he was frustrated and had dead eyes,lol. |
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Oct 20, 2010 13:46:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nachtlicht on Oct 29, 2010 21:07:52 GMT -5
i bet you people will LOVE this link: www.whale.to/b/mccartney_h.htmlfull to the max with pictures about the theory Paul is a or got a clone... what a awesome page.. |
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Oct 30, 2010 2:31:18 GMT -5
^ There's no way Faul is a clone of Paul. He's just a worse than average human double. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Oct 30, 2010 5:26:01 GMT -5
He's a patethic and ridiculous human double. Always has been and always will.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Oct 30, 2010 13:22:45 GMT -5
^ There's no way Faul is a clone of Paul. He's just a worse than average human double. lol I think Faul is a clone of Faul. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Oct 30, 2010 16:10:59 GMT -5
LOL...
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Oct 30, 2010 19:31:58 GMT -5
Faul is a clown.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Oct 30, 2010 21:05:33 GMT -5
Interesting that David Letterman's hellish and humiliating problem with his sex-young woman intern adultery/sex blackmail allegations against the CBS news guy began shortly after the Letterman-Faul interview, a focus of the Rotten Apple series on youtube, in which Letterman said to Faul that some people say you're not really Paul McCartney but an imposter.
And Conan O'Brien? As he been replaCIAed with a Fonan or not?
The sensational Letterman sex-intern-blackmail scandal has mysteriously and COMPLETELY disappeared from our controlled Brave New Media, hasn't it? How odd and Orwellian-as-usual.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Oct 31, 2010 22:47:20 GMT -5
Faul a clone...of what? Certainly not Paul Mc Cartney.
Faul, at best, looks like a bad Paul impersonator from a bad production of Beatlemania.
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Nov 1, 2010 2:08:52 GMT -5
IMO, this is not a clone (from Memphis, Aug. 19, 1966):  |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Nov 1, 2010 21:29:09 GMT -5
I agree, not a clone. There's something behind those eyes. If it were a clone, the eyes would have a deadness to them.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Nov 9, 2010 14:53:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Nov 9, 2010 14:58:38 GMT -5
IMO, this is not a clone (from Memphis, Aug. 19, 1966): Well it's not Faul, at least as we know him as the guy in Africa and on the cover of Pepper. He looks too much like Paul McCartney to be anything other than a clone imo. |
|
