|
|
Post by fauxster on Jul 15, 2010 14:27:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by treegenus on Jul 15, 2010 14:44:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 15, 2010 14:55:11 GMT -5
The guy in the pic is one of the FOHNS, so I doubt we can talk about "the real deal".
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jul 15, 2010 17:37:33 GMT -5
They're real photos of fake Beatles. ;D
Interesting though.
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Jul 15, 2010 19:40:37 GMT -5
I think they're all the replaCIAment Beatles, too. We can't really be sure that "Sue Baker" is a real person. She could just be a way to put "new" pics of the Featles on the Internet as part of the disinfo campaign to keep training people to see the Beatles as those hirsute acid freaks. JMO |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jul 15, 2010 19:55:49 GMT -5
Sue Baker, who was 15 when she began her obsession with the Fab Four, would visit
the band members' homes every weekend for two years.
She first started going to Paul McCartney's London home every week, having tracked
it down from a vague description in a Beatles magazine.
He eventually asked her if she ever visited John, George and Ringo. When she said
no, he gave her their addresses which she wrote on the back of an envelope.
I see. Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Jul 15, 2010 21:18:58 GMT -5
That sounds a lot like how Yoko Ono just knocked on Faul's door, & he gave her John's address. I wonder if all the Apple Scruffs were so lucky? lol
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jul 15, 2010 22:27:45 GMT -5
Yes, it's amazing that Sue figured out where Paul lived from a "vague
magazine article" and that she was the only one who did this and no one else
found out about it over the 2 years or tried to do the same. And, I guess
even her kid brother didn't tell anybody what they were doing on the
weekends. And, the other Fab Three didn't object to their addresses being
given to a stranger and they accepted her too. It's also amazing that their
homes were so accessible back then in the 60s.
|
|
|
|
Post by treegenus on Jul 16, 2010 12:50:21 GMT -5
Amazingly accessible Featles. Why are we all questioning Sue's info... we are bad, bad Doppelganger bloggers. <VBG> I think Fauster's so right - 'she could just be a way to put "new" pics of the Featles on the Internet as part of the disinfo campaign to keep training people to see the Beatles as those hirsute acid freaks.'
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 16, 2010 16:44:59 GMT -5
Like she'd be able to figure out the address from a vague magazine...like sherlok pointed out. Give me a break, showing up at Paul's door and then he gave her the other 3 addresses? Did we just fall off the turnip truck?  And this supposedly took place over the course of two years? And the wives/girlfriends of the Beatles would just accept some teenage groupie or "apple scruff" at their homes??? Sure, and giant maggots from beneath the sea have invaded New Orleans! Methinks Sue Baker is a made up name for a disinfo agent...or just one overinflated ego of a teenage bimbo! |
|
|
|
Post by lindsayjudy on Jul 16, 2010 16:58:04 GMT -5
In response to Beatlies' wonderful post on Paul/Faul:
Actuallly, Paul seemed to be replaced from late 1964 until late 1966 with a series of imposters or stand-ins, until Faul was camera-ready. It started shortly after their trip to Dallas TX, during which trip they had a bomb threat from the KKK.
As for the real Paul coming out of retirement (hiding), he did finally in his Back in the U.S. Tour (2001 or 2002). He's been out of retirement ever since.
And Paul wasn't the only Beatle to be replaced. They all were. Revolver was the last full album the Beatles made together. After that, the replacements took over.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jul 16, 2010 22:48:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 17, 2010 5:08:34 GMT -5
In response to Beatlies' wonderful post on Paul/Faul: Actuallly, Paul seemed to be replaced from late 1964 until late 1966 with a series of imposters or stand-ins, until Faul was camera-ready. It started shortly after their trip to Dallas TX, during which trip they had a bomb threat from the KKK. As for the real Paul coming out of retirement (hiding), he did finally in his Back in the U.S. Tour (2001 or 2002). He's been out of retirement ever since. And Paul wasn't the only Beatle to be replaced. They all were. Revolver was the last full album the Beatles made together. After that, the replacements took over. U have some problems, too bad u dont want to realize that. |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 17, 2010 20:30:36 GMT -5
The real Paul hasn't been around for decades. I believe he died in 1966. He didn't make a comeback in 2001, unless he performed from the great beyond.
|
|
|
|
Post by marisabia on Jul 17, 2010 21:10:05 GMT -5
rene descartes, another.
one last word on the car name, long ago or it seems so, i was a huge fan of jim carey, when jenny mcarthy came out, she was a very physical comedianne at that time, i used to think of her as the male version of jim carey.
also as far as paul mcartney goes the real paul was definitely more attractive, had wayyy more charisma. this paul mcartney is very, well ,effeminate i know this has been mentioned before but just wanted to put in my pov cause this is something a women like me knows. but on top of that the other evidence is overwhelming,
paul mcartney is def the slam dunk case for replacements.
|
|
