|
|
Post by lucy on Sept 16, 2011 19:57:46 GMT -5
Funny, while standing in line at the supermarket, on the cover of "Globe" which I know is just a joke tabloid, but in the top corner it has pictures of a young Doris Day and the real JPM and said they had a fling. Which is interesting at this time in history to even have in a tabloid that they were an item. While somewhere on the PID or replacement forums I read about the Doris Day being replaced and the Beatles spending time at Terry Melcher's home....
Just a strange item to see on a tabloid, and not the typical dribble about the Kardashians, Snooki or the teen moms of reality tv....
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Sept 17, 2011 13:07:42 GMT -5
Funny, while standing in line at the supermarket, on the cover of "Globe" which I know is just a joke tabloid, but in the top corner it has pictures of a young Doris Day and the real JPM and said they had a fling. Which is interesting at this time in history to even have in a tabloid that they were an item. While somewhere on the PID or replacement forums I read about the Doris Day being replaced and the Beatles spending time at Terry Melcher's home.... Just a strange item to see on a tabloid, and not the typical dribble about the Kardashians, Snooki or the teen moms of reality tv.... Yeah, and the "Like a Rolling Stone.... and Doris Day! Dig it! Dig it!" Foris Fay-Featles-Faul connection ties in heavily into the Charles Manson "Family" False Flag killings of 1969 and also the 1968 assassination of RFK, both of which greatly benefited the Pentagon (pro-Vietnam War, anti-anti-war backlash) and the GOP/Nixon regime. Would be wonderful if you could find that Doris Day-Paul McCartney article. There have been reports that Faul met with Charles Manson when he was meeting with the Beach Boys in Los Angeles. Was the alleged McCartney-Foris sexual liason before, during or after 1966? Faul just got married (to an American woman) again! |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Sept 18, 2011 9:51:26 GMT -5
It was on the cover of "The Globe" but I don't know if that was this week's or next week's material, that is if I went to the store, I don't know if it would still be there. Perhaps looking online.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Sept 18, 2011 9:54:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Sept 18, 2011 9:56:26 GMT -5
I wonder if Bill had this woman he just married sign a prenup? Does this woman really know that he's NOT the real Paul Mc Cartney?  I wonder when she will find out, if she doesn't already know? How many offspring will this union produce? Oh the questions.... |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Sept 18, 2011 10:30:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Sept 18, 2011 13:59:22 GMT -5
I dont mean to boast, but I think these pics will clarify once for all this whole "PAUL WAS REPLACED" matter. I admit I wasnt glad to find this out, but thats it. Though I risk to repeat myself, my love for Paul&the boys remains unchanged. Feel free to disagree. Different ears all over the place and sadly I must say the only real PAUL is the child from the 1st pic. I doubt he fixed his ears while still a teenager, plus that there was no need to ;D  So if we go by what you are saying, then this is not the real Paul either?  |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Sept 18, 2011 14:04:09 GMT -5
The pic is quite unclear and distant but as far as I can see, the ears just dont match.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Sept 18, 2011 14:37:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Sept 18, 2011 21:04:38 GMT -5
I can see what you are saying. And not only is there is a difference in the ears, but also the forehead.   |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Sept 18, 2011 22:14:09 GMT -5
Quite a bit shorter too
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Sept 19, 2011 7:32:51 GMT -5
I get your sarcasm, but would the face grow out that way so disproportionately? I mean for that to be the same person, the lower part of the face would have to grow only and the forehead would have to stay the same size.
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Sept 19, 2011 10:08:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Sept 19, 2011 10:35:22 GMT -5
I have something to interject, and pardon my rambling if it doesn't seem to parallel what your ideas are on this matter, there had been discussion in another forum regarding a Paul double called "Mountain Man". There was this alternate Faul that appeared for a short time who resembled the real Paul, but was clearly not the man I've seen referred to as Faul/Bill, the character that we know as "Sir Paul".
His facial shape was similar to the real Paul's face, but not the longer thin face of "Bill". Most of the pictures of the late 60's of a bearded man was not the same Faul and many have called him "Mountain Man".
I am thinking that many of these so called "childhood pics of Paul Mc Cartney" may actually be this one imposter's childhood. Which would explain why there are definite differences in features among those displayed. The hairline, high forehead, facial shape, particular features like nose, chin, lips, would not be that different from boyhood to teens. While the head and face grows, the features, like ears, if they stuck out in childhood, they would still stick out as a teen, highly doubting that in that time, people pinned ears back.
One can clearly see that those pics of a child and teen are not the same person.
Now, we can only speculate that if someone as "Mountain Man" could be. The person we are told to be Paul's brother, Mike, may even be a plant, if these people had been picked out even much younger than we suspected to be primed for a staged band. Who is to say that "MOuntain Man" or whoever the other young man is who resembles Paul, but isn't Paul was a real brother, or even a cousin. (I had attended an aunt's funeral about 10 years ago and was dumbstruck as one of her sons, my cousin, had a striking resemblance to my oldest brother. They looked more like brothers than the other sons my aunt had.) That being said, who is to say that some of these doubles may have been a real sibling, or relative that bear a striking resemblance.
I don't want to toss aside the idea of "clones" but those doubles never seemed to have that "clone" eye thing, as we see in many celebrity replacements.
So that is my take on why there are such discrepancies in the differences in features of these "young Paul" pics. Unless some have been doctored to make them look more like "Bill". I would not dare to say that any of those pics displayed are "Bill" young, because the man was born with light eyes and blonde hair. The only offspring attributed to "Paul Mc Cartney" that has dark hair is Mary, the rest of the children had blonde hair, even the child to Heather Mills. I had even dared to say that I had thought "Mary" was actually the offspring of "Mountain Man", because on the cover of the "Mc Cartney" album that showed a bearded "Paul" resembled JPM and not "Bill" with a beard, and the baby in his jacket was Mary. That's just my thought on that matter.
But those pics are not all of the same person. Those pics with a young man with the "ELvis" type hair has a long thin face. The ears and lips, as well as the eyes differ on some of them.
I don't know if bringing in pics of a "Mountain" man could help match some features or not. But something is definitely rotten in Denmark.
Even some of the pics of a young George and John seem to be different. And I beg your pardon for repeating myself here, but some of those young pics of John, in the eye area, has an "Asian" almond shaped appearance as if there may be some Asian in his background somewhere in his tree.
So, it begs to ask the question, how early in the lives of these extremely famous people, such as Elvis, the Beatles, Michael Jackson, etc, are they being picked out for stardom?
Celebs of a moderate stature, like many "Tv" and "movie" "stars", maybe not chosen from childhood, but perhaps selected in their high school years. This would explain how and why some of these people look radically different from their high school pictures and what they look like now? Some of those people were "scouted" out through agents who may have spotted these people in high school plays, or some other such presentations that people could see these people before fame.
Just throwing my take on the matter and how it's possible that people were "chosen" before fame....
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Sept 20, 2011 5:15:53 GMT -5
PAUL as a Scout Boy cca. 1952   |
|
