|
Post by lostworld on Jan 4, 2009 10:51:04 GMT -5
Great comparisons Faulcon!
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 4, 2009 15:09:11 GMT -5
Oh, and for those who cannot still see the differences, I say, they need eye exams!
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 5, 2009 1:11:44 GMT -5
I think Paul has had his face stretched in this one...
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 7, 2009 2:39:54 GMT -5
Faul's green eyes in SFF:
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 7, 2009 3:45:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Jan 7, 2009 4:44:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 7, 2009 15:27:01 GMT -5
^ There is an even worse one of Faul cooking. I should look for it, but it's really awful. Actually, I can't even really stand to hear him sing anymore. Well, the Beatles songs he sings are still ok, but the solo stuff, forget about it :-P
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 7, 2009 23:19:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 9, 2009 20:55:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 17, 2009 20:49:57 GMT -5
Paul in Memphis, Aug 19, 1966 v. what I believe to be a Faul in San Francisco, Aug 29, 1966
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 18, 2009 2:20:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by scarabbey on Jan 18, 2009 23:27:20 GMT -5
Hey, Falcon!
If that guy in San Francisco is very good double, he looks very like Paul, why The Beatles had to made another one in the autumn of 1966 (whom we have now)? I see they (doubles) are different!
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 19, 2009 2:34:03 GMT -5
Hey Scarabbey! Some people think the pic of "Paul" in San Fran is Paul, some think it's a Faul. I'm just trying to zero in on the date it all went down. I'm starting to think that whatever happened to Paul happened between Aug 19 & Aug 28, 1966. If it's a Faul, but not Bill, then I don't know why they didn't stick w/ him. Maybe he had the looks but not the voice?
|
|
|
Post by scarabbey on Jan 19, 2009 6:27:45 GMT -5
Something prevents me to say that it's Paul. Something unusual in his face. It's also necessary to take into consideration Paul's haircut, it's changing during this period of time. Remember 1964 Press conference:
Q: "How many of you are bald, that you have to wear those wigs?"
RINGO: "All of us."
PAUL: "I'M BALD."
Q: "You're bald?"
JOHN: "Oh, we're all bald, yeah."
PAUL: "Don't tell anyone, please."
I'm still thinking. May be he really was bald.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 19, 2009 13:38:30 GMT -5
Something prevents me to say that it's Paul. Something unusual in his face. It's also necessary to take into consideration Paul's haircut, it's changing during this period of time. Remember 1964 Press conference: Q: "How many of you are bald, that you have to wear those wigs?" RINGO: "All of us." PAUL: "I'M BALD." Q: "You're bald?" JOHN: "Oh, we're all bald, yeah." PAUL: "Don't tell anyone, please." I'm still thinking. May be he really was bald. It's been proven that he was bald: see the video clips at the NIR forum and at the 60IF forum of JPM flipping his wig accidentally at a 1964 Paris Beatles concert. It would be great if someone could post that here on this forum!
|
|