|
Post by lostworld on Nov 27, 2008 15:08:03 GMT -5
Rebecca de Mornay and Traci Lords is a good comparison
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 29, 2008 9:28:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Dec 2, 2008 19:51:59 GMT -5
More in this vein: REVOLUTION 9 :: Revolution :: REVOLUTION 9 :: Love the Double Author Topic: Love the Double (Read 1,732 times) Athenais Administrator member is offline Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 548 Love the Double « Thread Started on Nov 21, 2005, 3:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is an interesting website with information about cloning and the use of doubles: www.whale.to/b/sp/ax3.htmlQuote: What has developed is a situation where the American people are no longer in touch with where the elite's secret technology is. It is clear that the elite know this and are aware that some of the "Future Shock" needs to reduced if they don't want to self-destruct society. You need to be aware (mentally prepared) that most of the readers of this will experience future shock when they read that cloning of humans is possible & has gone on for decades. The elite had a dilemma. If society isn't moved forward to match their secret scientific advances, it will soon be like cave-men meeting modern-day men. Society won't be capable of adjusting--only self-destructing. On the other hand they certainly can't tell us what they are already doing, because they are using this technology against us to control us. The author goes on to explain that the entertainment industry is used to condition the public to accept the conditions put in place by the elite. I would guess that many "conspiracy" based websites are being used for the same purpose. Quote: There is an ongoing program to find look alikes for prominent people, as well as a program to create secret identical twins (which are separated at birth and never see each other). George Bush's double was promiscuous, while George Bush is a pedophile. His double was living in France after Bush was no longer President. By the use of doubles, (or one of the synthetics or organic robotoids) the elite are able to sneak away and perform satanic rituals. On certain occasions, if Clinton or Bush only needed to do low level tasks in front of the public, they could have their double substitute for them. The Illuminati working with several organizations has had a look alike operation where doubles of certain key people are found and then used. In the book Desert Shield and The New World Order pub. by Northpoint Tactical Teams, Topton, NC, if you look on page 32 you will see a picture of the original FDR who had a mole over his eyes and then you will a see a picture of the double of Roosevelt who they used, who had no mole and had different ear lobes. Roosevelt may have died prior to when it was actually announced. Over the years I have seen numerous photos exposing either the Robotoids or the doubles that they use. This author's previous S' ?3 article had some pictures about the dead Pope Paul VI, who my Be Wise As Serpents book said was murdered. This recent Pope was replaced with a double who had had plastic surgery. As a double gets older the plastic surgery will not look as convincing, because time changes people differently. One ex-Catholic said the whole thing sounded like science fiction. It does sound far out at first, but the evidence is there for people to see. For myself, the ex-Illuminati have told me about the doubles program. From what I understand the double or look-alike program has been more successful than the robotoids and synthetics. The reason is that people live longer and are more dependable in some ways. The project to find look alikes for prominent people has been very successful. Plastic surgery has also been done to help touch up the doubles. www.whale.to/b/sp/ax3.html#C5._Doubles_(look_alikes). Btw...Chase has a catchy new credit card slogan: LOVE THE DOUBLE
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Dec 3, 2008 11:26:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Dec 4, 2008 4:32:25 GMT -5
From Aug 9, 2004: ... S: Matthew, excuse me, but it is true that Bush is a clone? And if it is, why hasn’t a new clone replaced this one that seems to have become really irrational? 4. MATTHEW: Yes, the President Bush seen publicly is a clone. It was only when he became governor of Texas that it occurred to the powers that be to have him cloned. By that time, alcohol had seriously compromised his physical and mental status, so the first clone could only be a poor specimen. Because the art and science of human—or even animal—cloning is far from perfected on Earth, there is deterioration with each successive clone, so a replacement cannot be in much better condition than the predecessor. And since the brain’s storage unit cannot be downloaded into a physically-ready clone until a new one is required, because all knowledge to that date must be included, by now there is little chance that Bush’s mental condition will improve. S: Does the clone have a soul? 5. MATTHEW: No. S: Maybe that’s causing or at least adding to his behavior? 6. MATTHEW: It may be contributing to his stated belief that he has been anointed by God to do what he’s doing, but basically it is the personality that is quite authentically reproduced in clones that you are witnessing. It will be surprising if his controllers can be patient much longer with his erratic behavior and diminishing effectiveness in carrying out their orders, but regardless of their concerns, this will not be publicly apparent... www.matthewbooks.com/mm/anmviewer.asp?a=18&z=2
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Dec 4, 2008 18:36:19 GMT -5
^ S: Does the clone have a soul?
5. MATTHEW: No.
Explains a lot... Not only when it comes to Bush.
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Dec 5, 2008 4:46:21 GMT -5
Here's more on souls & clones: From www.matthewbooks.com/mm/anmviewer.asp?a=8&z=2:25. The body has its own life force, so soulless clones are every bit as physically alive as any incarnated soul. What clones lack are the properties of a soul—emotions, especially the capacity to give and receive love; conscience, the sense of right and wrong; moral integrity and honor; intuition; and of course, the awareness of a godself. Clones without souls function totally within whatever measure of intellect and personality was downloaded from the person or a predecessor clone and by behaving in accordance with what they observe around them. Therefore, depending upon what was inherited from the cloned person and the environment in which it lives, a soulless clone may behave in a pleasant, helpful fashion. Clones may be, but not necessarily are produced by any civilization with the technological knowledge to do so. 26. A soul may choose to enter a clone. However, since the only adult human clones on Earth at this point are of maximally powerful people who want to insure that in the event of their death, their control continues over the unaware public, few souls choose to inhabit these cloned bodies. Those who choose to do so come from the highest light, and they enter for the purpose of turning a darkly inclined person into the light. Sometimes this is successful and other times it is not; when it is not, it’s because the darkness is so inculcated in the person’s character that even with the strong will of the lighted soul, it becomes trapped in that density.
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Dec 5, 2008 13:00:11 GMT -5
One of Hollywood's most re-made movies is Invasion of the Body Snatchers in which people are replaced by emotionless copies bent on taking over the world. First in 1956 starring Kevin McCarthy: Then in 1978 starring Donald Sutherland: Then as Body Snatchers in 1993: And, as The Invasion starring Ficole Fidman in 2007: Also, in 2005 the ABC TV series Invasion had a similar theme: And, so did the 2005 CBS series Threshold:
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Dec 5, 2008 15:17:58 GMT -5
Absolutely. Movie posters are a wealth of information especially in the tag lines. I was shocked when one day I was able to see through all the movie posters and tag lines as to what they really implied. Take for example 'Oceans Thirteen's' poster: www.cinemaevideo.com.br/liq/upload/conteudo_editor/Image/oceans13_01.jpg222.jpg" What are the odds of getting even?" Why are they looking up? Ostensibly because of the casino cameras, but the number 13 in the center of the table is not without significance. Anyway, I also wanted to mention that I think clones are definitely soulless and the reason they are creating them is so that the other dimensional entities (that they contacted through their ritual games) can live out human lives in this dimension. Those entities can possess clone bodies more easily than souled humans who were traumatized to the point that their souls flew away. This is the reason for clones IMO.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Dec 10, 2008 14:19:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Dec 10, 2008 16:38:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Dec 11, 2008 18:17:22 GMT -5
It's a cloned post. Lostworld and others, I have to say now that I'm at least willing to consider the possibility of human cloning, and even that such cloning has been possible since the 1950s (I have no doubt that secret research had been going on into the field, probably starting in Nazi Germany). But I'm still not completely sold on the idea. I'm changing my opinion because of some new, disturbing clues and indications that it was done a long time ago, and some contradictions in the official, open literature that suggest the science of cloning and human reproduction we've been getting in the public imay be a false, cover story for the real developments and science, which has been branded classfiied. But again, I still haven't seen enough evidence/solid proof to convince me. Does anyone know the identity of the girl on the Back to the Egg (1979) album cover? It doesn't appear to be Linda.
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Dec 11, 2008 23:20:31 GMT -5
It's a cloned post. Lostworld and others, I have to say now that I'm at least willing to consider the possibility of human cloning, and even that such cloning has been possible since the 1950s (I have no doubt that secret research had been going on into the field, probably starting in Nazi Germany). But I'm still not completely sold on the idea. I'm changing my opinion because of some new, disturbing clues and indications that it was done a long time ago, and some contradictions in the official, open literature that suggest the science of cloning and human reproduction we've been getting in the public imay be a false, cover story for the real developments and science, which has been branded classfiied. But again, I still haven't seen enough evidence/solid proof to convince me. Does anyone know the identity of the girl on the Back to the Egg (1979) album cover? It doesn't appear to be Linda. Hi Beatlies! It's a cloned post.
LOL! Maybe we should continue to do that to maxify the effect? That sure is a bizarre place though... Lostworld and others, I have to say now that I'm at least willing to consider the possibility of human cloningAbout the clones: I totally respect where you're coming from. You seem to be a person who wants to have " all the facts straight" so to speak. And I understand that you do a lot of background research, judging from your posts That's very good! I am the same way, although I can't wait for those evidence or solid proofs that you're talking about. They sure don't wanna let us now about that... I do like I always do - I keep a critical eye on everything. And those things that fit into the puzzle I keep. I go very much on what I know so far + logic, the evidence that's there + my instinct of course. So far all the small pieces have added up and it's also what lead me here to you guys Everyone has to go on what feels right for him/her. Like I always say, these ideas/theories can and should never be forced on anyone. I didn't know much of cloning before and there is still a lot to be learnt - however, I still think it explains a lot of what's going on. And why some replacements are so good, and/or look so soul-less and plastic. And why many celebrities look so alike, cause they're probably experimenting with the same successfull DNA (beauty/talent) a lot... The best learner is always the one who can change his mind, and be open to knew things. Not that we HAVE TO change, but that we leave the door open for it. A closed mind never finds the truth...
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Dec 12, 2008 0:29:49 GMT -5
Found this in the amazon comments for the 1978 David Rorvik book In His Image: The Cloning of a Man---
david rorvik book on cloning - REAL - no bs . . plz help !!, July 17, 2006 By Gene S. "Gene S." (new york , ny) - See all my reviews
This review is from: In his image: The cloning of a man I'm the one in the book which was apparently cloned off of a mid 50-60 ish man. I'm not sure who 2 talk 2 about this but hey you could spread the word around. Born in San Francisco , ca nov. 21st , 1978. Born in Childrens Hospital but my certified bc looks like someone was trying 2 pull a fast one. I grew up in central california then got put into some sort of spiritual quest. I used 2 get asked all the time - hey do you have an older brother - but i'm like not that i'm aware of . I've always felt as if i was brought up in a home away from home. Being intuitively watched from a distance & what not. I'm not sure how 2 contact David M. Rorvik in regards 2 this matter. I'm currently living in New York , New York . Please be free to contact me at voodoogodasleep@yahoo.com - if you could possibly assist me in this matter - it would be greatly & deeply appreciated . thank you . . gene s. Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? (Report this)
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Dec 12, 2008 2:49:33 GMT -5
|
|