|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 14:53:56 GMT -5
What Ill do now is kinda crappy work. Copying all BRITNEY SPEARS post here, where they really belong... With apologizes... Til some proof I still think its Britney, although I pointed out a few times that she may have been replaced. Well I didn't even look at pics and I knew she was replaced. Simply because that's how this game works. In my experience, no-one makes it through that to be that big of a celebrity without being replaced at least once. Britney Spears    Already cloned?  Fritney# 1    Fritney# 2  Fritney# 3  I think Fritney# 2 is the image people think of when they think of Britney. Fritney# 1 is the Mouseketeer-era Britney and Fritney# 3 is how she has looked recently. That's how I see it. Any input is welcome. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 14:56:37 GMT -5
goro
I think Britney has been replaced at least once, but part of this is informed by a site I saw years ago - clicking on other links from a celeb gossip site - which was sort of a humor site that had a page about "The Mystery of Britney's Ever-Changing Breast Size." In it it showed how in a relatively short period of time she went from a flat A cup to much bigger boobs, to slightly smaller boobs, to really big ones again (and this was all before her first pregnancy) and the incredible weirdness of it all instantly made me go "This can't just be explained by someone who was pressured into getting bigger boobs and then had them removed due to infections, discomfort, or scarring" which so often happens in these cases. Because it was like, small ones, huge ones, smaller ones, huge ones, tiny ones again, bigger ones - at that point I remember thinking, "Well some of these must be a stand in or body double or something." Or something is right!
Some of the Brit's in Mask's photo sample have a thicker, Cupid-like upper lip, but this isn't looking like the results of lip injections/collagen to me because her lips don't have that "trout pout" - it's just her upper lip suddenly looks much more rounded than the completely flat upper lip the earlier Brits had.
Brit definitely had a nose job, and/or the replacement had a thinner nose, too.
But what is most telling to me is the distance between the early Brit's nose and inner eyes. There's a lot of space there. Later versions of Brit don't have that wide space between the edge of the nose and the edge of the inner eye. Do you guys and gals see this? That is what is selling the replacement idea to me the most.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 14:59:25 GMT -5
But what is most telling to me is the distance between the early Brit's nose and inner eyes. There's a lot of space there. Later versions of Brit don't have that wide space between the edge of the nose and the edge of the inner eye. Do you guys and gals see this? That is what is selling the replacement idea to me the most. Yes, I noticed this right away. Eye distance is quite different. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 15:00:16 GMT -5
Finally, time for my BRITNEY SPEARS input here. Mask's post is more relevant, so I dont know of how much use mine will be. I remember very well a famous documentary on this troubled soul and I was deeply impressed by her strong and powerful singing voice while she was just a young girl and I couldnt help comparing it to her actual one; voice/the voice we all know. How on earth, I said to myself, a voice like Joss Stone's has turned into the baby/high pitched one? What happened to her real voice, her real talent? I assume mind control changed that too... Notice the difference in the body in the last pics. And btw these BRITNEY posts should be moved where they belong, either MY LIST, either REPLACED OR NOT REPLACED. Hope noone disagrees that  As far as her replacement goes, I believe she followed or rather to say she was forced to follow the same pattern as AGUILERA, which means by 2001 BRIT was already gone. The real BRIT, obviously  Beginnings     2000  2007    2008  2009  2010  Last week    At random        |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 15:01:12 GMT -5
Hint?  And dont forget the vids for TOXIC and WOMANIZER also hinting at multiple BRITNEY's and MK/split personalities at the same time. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 15:02:20 GMT -5
lucy
My take is that they cloned her while still a young mouseketeer...in other words, as The Mask has shown with other celebs, BEFORE fame. Because the child and some of the "Hit Me Baby One More Time" era resemble each other. So I'm thinking cloned before fame, and then replaced about 2000, and another replacement by '07. That's my take on it. Because I do see some differences in the distance between the eyes. But the eyes on the child and the teen Fritney, she grew into her face, so to speak. But the later ones had different eyes...and the body type. I agree with the comments, that the child singer had a strong voice, yet by the time of pop tart, a very lame vocal and the recent vocals are heavily electronic enhancing. Also noticed that a video was filmed in a way that when it's shown on tv, makes her look tall and very thin. Yet paparazzi picks shows a more "dumpy" Frit...in the 07, 08 era. And the era of her wackiness, head shaving, bat swinging nutball, definitely a strange replacement.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 15:04:27 GMT -5
Id rather say a replacement whose programming broke up...
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 15:05:26 GMT -5
goro
Around the time Britney/Fitney had her shaving her head, running around trying to check into luxury hotels without any money, breakdown, she was quoted as saying "I'm so tired of them stickign things in me" or "putting things in me", I forget. Electroshock to help erase the memory of who she really was? Torture and mind control to try to IMPLANT new memories? All of it is possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Bearer on Aug 28, 2012 1:12:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Aug 28, 2012 4:18:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Bearer on Aug 28, 2012 6:08:00 GMT -5
You don't think she deserves her own thread?  You know, that thread you posted has a rediculous number of pages.  |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Aug 28, 2012 6:25:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Bearer on Aug 28, 2012 19:08:59 GMT -5
Ok, you can go ahead and completely delete this thread now. |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Aug 28, 2012 22:57:11 GMT -5
Both of you have points. There can be too many threads or there can be threads that are too long.
Once I get in touch with the original mod of this forum, I am going to add some sections, for instance, one exclusively dedicated to Paul McCartney.
|
|
|
|
Post by J Gimmysum Truth on Sept 14, 2012 17:56:49 GMT -5
What Ill do now is kinda crappy work. Concur. Please try not to post uninformed, admittedly ignorant opinions or feelings. Have a basis for your statements. This is a research forum, not group therapy What experience are you referring to? |
|
Til some proof I still think its Britney, although I pointed out a few times that she may have been replaced.
As far as her replacement goes, I believe she followed or rather to say she was forced to follow the same pattern as AGUILERA, which means by 2001 BRIT was already gone.
