|
|
My List
Jul 31, 2010 5:47:33 GMT -5
Post by artemis on Jul 31, 2010 5:47:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
My List
Jul 31, 2010 5:48:04 GMT -5
Post by artemis on Jul 31, 2010 5:48:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
My List
Jul 31, 2010 9:31:22 GMT -5
Post by The Mask on Jul 31, 2010 9:31:22 GMT -5
Looks like we are already on to our third Carrie. |
|
|
|
My List
Jul 31, 2010 9:33:13 GMT -5
Post by The Mask on Jul 31, 2010 9:33:13 GMT -5
Even with the blonde hair you can still tell the difference between her and the original Rachel. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Aug 1, 2010 3:41:40 GMT -5
Even with the blonde hair you can still tell the difference between her and the original Rachel. "I think she is beautiful and I loved her in Red Eye. But does anyone else think she looks better in motion rather than in her still pictures? For whatever reason when she is in a movie I can't stop looking at her, but when I see her in a picture she doesn't look as good. Still very beautiful, but something changes with her more than others."
"I met her in 2000-ish, when she was working on "Shotgun Love Dolls", her first TV credit. She was a pretty girl but very ordinary girl-next-door looking...and with a very ordinary girl-next-door wardrobe. No one would have pointed her out in a crowd and said "future movie star". She seemed nice. She smiled and said hello to me (genuinely) and I was a nobody on that movie! Anyhow, was pretty shocked when she became a star a short time later with "The Notebook". Funnily enough, Malin Akerman was also in "Shotgun Love Dolls". Now she looked more the Hollywood type. Skinny, blonde and beautiful...the kind of girl that guys would have fallen over themselves to get to.""Watch "Mean Girls" "The Notebook" and "The Lucky Ones". Pay attention to how different she is in each one. And no I'm not talking about her hair color. Watch her facial expressions, her body language, how she verbally reacts to things. She's one of those rare actors who can change themselves from one film to another. That's the definition of a good actor. Even if you just watch "Mean Girls" and "The Hot Chick" ... she plays the selfish, b!tchy, "Queen Bee" popular high school girl in both of those films and yet she still comes off very different in both."
|
|
|
|
Post by celeb1 on Aug 1, 2010 6:11:16 GMT -5
I think these handlers are having a field day with these stars. Whoever is in charge of Lindsay Lohan has been doing a fine job of ruining a star who was very talented. This reminds me...I just recently watched the Manchurian Candidate(original) for the 1st time. What I found chilling was that the handler was the mother. Taken from wiki: "She marries and gives birth to a son, Raymond (played by Laurence Harvey in the original film, and by Liev Schreiber in the remake). Their relationship is extremely dysfunctional; Raymond despises his mother, but nevertheless has an unhealthy dependence upon her. She dominates her son his entire life, turning him into an emotionally crippled manchild virtually incapable of friendship or love. When he volunteers for the Korean War, she uses his accomplishment as public relations for her own career." |
|
|
|
My List
Aug 1, 2010 11:11:41 GMT -5
Post by The Mask on Aug 1, 2010 11:11:41 GMT -5
Regarding Rachel McAdams again, she was replaced by 2004. As a matter of fact, it probably happened by late 2003.
*Rachel was on the Canadian tv show Slings and Arrows which debuted on November 3, 2003. She starred in 6 episodes which aired that fall. She did not appear on any episodes in all of 2004.
*Rachel was in the 2004 film Mean Girls, which was released on April 30, 2004. Yet we see her double's first appearance in the film The Notebook, which was released on June 25, 2004.
So therefore giving production times, it had to be mid to late 2003 when Rachel was replaced. It can take a year or longer for a movie to be released after it is filmed and because the first appearance of "Fachel" is in The Notebook released in June of 2004, she had to have been replaced in 2003 some time. There was possibly an overlap of Rachel and her double in 2003 but it all depends on how far in advanced the show Slings and Arrows was shot and the movie The Notebook was shot.
*It bears mentioning that Fachel made an appearance on the show Slings and Arrows in June of 2005 as a "special guest appearance".
There are a few things I notice right away between Rachel McAdams and her double. Her double has a more prominent forehead for one and a narrower facial strucutre. Plus the voice is different. Look for these differences in the following yt videos:
Rachel in Slings and Arrows beginning at 2:03:
Fachel making her guest appearance in 2005 on Slings and Arrows beginning at 7:40. Notice the different voice:
|
|
|
|
My List
Aug 1, 2010 15:31:22 GMT -5
Post by artemis on Aug 1, 2010 15:31:22 GMT -5
Very good post once more, putting all in clear about RACHEL MCADAMS.
|
|
|
|
My List
Aug 1, 2010 16:08:03 GMT -5
Post by sherlok on Aug 1, 2010 16:08:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
My List
Aug 1, 2010 16:09:55 GMT -5
Post by beatlies on Aug 1, 2010 16:09:55 GMT -5
Regarding Rachel McAdams again, she was replaced by 2004. As a matter of fact, it probably happened by late 2003. *Rachel was on the Canadian tv show Slings and Arrows which debuted on November 3, 2003. She starred in 6 episodes which aired that fall. She did not appear on any episodes in all of 2004.*Rachel was in the 2004 film Mean Girls, which was released on April 30, 2004. Yet we see her double's first appearance in the film The Notebook, which was released on June 25, 2004. So therefore giving production times, it had to be mid to late 2003 when Rachel was replaced. It can take a year or longer for a movie to be released after it is filmed and because the first appearance of "Fachel" is in The Notebook released in June of 2004, she had to have been replaced in 2003 some time. There was possibly an overlap of Rachel and her double in 2003 but it all depends on how far in advanced the show Slings and Arrows was shot and the movie The Notebook was shot. *It bears mentioning that Fachel made an appearance on the show Slings and Arrows in June of 2005 as a "special guest appearance". There are a few things I notice right away between Rachel McAdams and her double. Her double has a more prominent forehead for one and a narrower facial strucutre. Plus the voice is different. Look for these differences in the following yt videos: Rachel in Slings and Arrows beginning at 2:03: Fachel making her guest appearance in 2005 on Slings and Arrows beginning at 7:40. Notice the different voice: Outrageously obvious imposter. Absolutely no way that's the same woman. Not even close! Is this an "experiment" type of imposter celeb-psy-ops to see how they can get away with so obviously not the same person? Or just mocking the masses as usual....? Note: Fachel FcAdams has a "cuter," more chiseled, WASPier face. |
|
|
|
My List
Aug 1, 2010 16:15:06 GMT -5
Post by artemis on Aug 1, 2010 16:15:06 GMT -5
Since all this fuss around her lately, Ive been thinking about a possible replacement as far as she is/was concerned. A small comparison:  They needed a more submissive "SANDRA" to accomplish their goals... |
|
|
|
My List
Aug 1, 2010 16:15:17 GMT -5
Post by beatlies on Aug 1, 2010 16:15:17 GMT -5
Probably.... profile/ear/voice comparisons anyone? |
|
|
|
My List
Aug 1, 2010 16:45:19 GMT -5
Post by The Mask on Aug 1, 2010 16:45:19 GMT -5
Well she has a unique hair line. Perhaps someone can find a picture of her lately showing this?  |
|
|
|
My List
Aug 1, 2010 16:52:19 GMT -5
Post by The Mask on Aug 1, 2010 16:52:19 GMT -5
Is this an "experiment" type of imposter celeb-psy-ops to see how they can get away with so obviously not the same person? Or just mocking the masses as usual....? I think they mock us regularly. I've seen evidence of this in episodes of Three's Company and Friends. |
|
|
|
My List
Aug 1, 2010 16:58:32 GMT -5
Post by artemis on Aug 1, 2010 16:58:32 GMT -5
|
|
