|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 18, 2010 20:00:59 GMT -5
Who is to say that these celebrities were not mind controlled before they were famous? If these people came from Illuminati bloodlines, military backgrounds, or political backgrounds...yet not be "famous" until they become singers or "actors".
You research, many of the famous people came from military backgrounds. You need to understand that any "big" name celebrity does not get there because they are gifted singers or actors. They are mind controlled in the first place, and they have alters that are probably the gifted singer or actor or musician. The "alter" is brought out and they "perform" and then go back to their sex slave/information delivery slaves when they are not on stage.
Be not that naive to think that stars are just found in diners or coffee shops. The ones who are "famous" and "infamous" are those who have done their deeds to be famous. It's not just by being a talented actor going to the big city and bright lights.
You need to research mind control and realize most of the famous people we are familiar with are sex slaves or handlers.
|
|
|
|
Post by bzzerk on Dec 18, 2010 21:08:33 GMT -5
Lucy, I'm quite familiar with the topic of mind control and I agree the entertainment industry is essentially a family business and that generally speaking, 'ordinary' people don't make it in Hollywood.
This thread is more specifically dealing with the replacement of the original entertainers. In some instances the replacements are quite obviously different to the original (in terms of facial features, height etc.) and I want to know how they're found/recruited.
Perhaps some replacements are already mind controlled, others are synthetics, others clones, but I'm sure some are just ordinary people who've been entised into the role with fame and fortune.
Another question is why people are replaced? It's been suggested people are replaced when they're not going along with the 'agenda' however this would suggest the person has free will, which a mind-controlled person would not. I think mind control is wide-spread in the entertainment industry however I also believe there are ordinary people in the mix too.
|
|
|
|
Post by goro on Dec 19, 2010 13:29:59 GMT -5
A lot of performers are disenfranchised from their parents and families. Many already come from abusive backgrounds and have disassociated from dealing with family. Between those issues and the money factors (plus the shortterm cheap thrill of getting all the applause and attention while you're pretending to be that famous person,) I think a lot of replacments could be pulled from the huge numbers of wannabe performers out there. I agree, though, that a NORMAL person with a healthy ego and identity wouldn't find the idea appealing at all. But given many actors and comedians I've known personally, almost all of them came from sad backgrounds and didn't enjoy close relationships with parents, etc. anymore. For them they would probably have jumped at the chance to be a replacement - part time or full time. Think of all the instant perks you get. Fans and groupies throwing themselves at you, copious, free drugs, you know, all that nonsense that is appealing to some.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 19, 2010 19:44:06 GMT -5
They could be looking for people with unusual personality types that thrive on being in the spotlight, and that lures people into the world of fame and there are people who have no scruples. They want what they want, what makes them feel good and perhaps their background was less than desirable, so walking away from an old life that wasn't very appealing, perhaps painful, even if it means undergoing plastic surgery and pretending to be someone else.
|
|
|
|
Post by bzzerk on Dec 19, 2010 21:40:14 GMT -5
There's a huge risk in using ordinary, non mind-controlled people as replacements. There's a risk someone might let the cat out of the bag, but then the media is so wrapped up and complicit in the whole replacement agenda, that anyone who spoke out publically about it would be immediately vilified and have their sanity questioned (Randy Quaid anyone?).
I doubt anyone would even have an outlet to publically talk about replacements - no major news corp would touch such a story.
Who knows what technology is available either - maybe replacements have their thoughts constantly monitored in real-time and if they start thinking about talking, the military/CIA are notified and they're taken out..
|
|
|
|
Post by treegenus on Dec 20, 2010 10:37:15 GMT -5
There's a huge risk in using ordinary, non mind-controlled people as replacements. There's a risk someone might let the cat out of the bag, but then the media is so wrapped up and complicit in the whole replacement agenda, that anyone who spoke out publically about it would be immediately vilified and have their sanity questioned (Randy Quaid anyone?). I doubt anyone would even have an outlet to publically talk about replacements - no major news corp would touch such a story. Who knows what technology is available either - maybe replacements have their thoughts constantly monitored in real-time and if they start thinking about talking, the military/CIA are notified and they're taken out.. And IMO they have RFIDs to monitor and implant thoughts in case their thought patterns should stray. They might not need to be taken out with RFID monitoring, just taken out if they start to age too much <G>? RFIDs seem to be covertly commonly used in this strange weird-world IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 20, 2010 14:57:03 GMT -5
The technology being used would be mindboggling for those of us who are not in on those activities behind the scenes.
|
|
|
|
Post by bzzerk on Dec 20, 2010 20:51:24 GMT -5
The technology being used would be mindboggling for those of us who are not in on those activities behind the scenes. To think that human cloning alone has been going on in secret, for possibly 50 years is pretty hard to grasp. I've even read that human cloning has been occuring since around 1920! The whole concept of synthetics is hard to believe too but nothing surprises me anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by test1 on Dec 21, 2010 7:17:35 GMT -5
We've been so heavily programmed as a culture to believe that you need 100's of p.h.d's gazillions of dollars hi tech research facilities and a god miracle to clone people that perhaps the reality is something far less complex and convoluted.
|
|
|
|
Post by test1 on Dec 21, 2010 7:19:09 GMT -5
These people , things, entities perhaps are a culture of their very own bred specfically to become replacements.
That or out of work hollywood actors l.o.l.
|
|
John
Research Assisstant
Posts: 57
|
Post by John on Dec 21, 2010 10:18:20 GMT -5
I think Springmeier said they can get computers to run people by implants whale.to/b/beast.htmlNot sure what synthetics are, any examples? Do you think they made a clone from Sheryl Crow DNA after she died? the doubles seem to get into plastic surgery, maybe the ones who weren't such a good fit |
|
|
|
Post by bzzerk on Dec 21, 2010 18:33:24 GMT -5
I think Springmeier said they can get computers to run people by implants whale.to/b/beast.htmlNot sure what synthetics are, any examples? Do you think they made a clone from Sheryl Crow DNA after she died? the doubles seem to get into plastic surgery, maybe the ones who weren't such a good fit I think the replacement Sheryl differs too much in appearance to be a clone. I also think perhaps mind controlled celebs are programmed or maybe forced via threats/bribery into getting plastic surgery in order to provide an excuse for changes in appearance, post replacement. It's easier in the public's mind, to chalk replacement down to drug use or plastic surgery, than to accept the fairly obvious truth. |
|
