|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jun 20, 2012 0:03:46 GMT -5
The web site discussing Nicoles and Rons faked death is "The Mad Revionist". I think a lot of it is satire,but what is satire and what is reality can be darn hard to see,lol. That is one major reason they can get away with all this stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 20, 2012 2:42:34 GMT -5
Then sorry, its all bullsh*t, just like that whole site. It is not even worth mentioning... Some idiots have too much spare time on their hands and one proof is that "THE MAD REVISIONIST" site... I wouldnt rule out NICOLE&RON still being alive, after all we live in this crappy world where nothing is real, as they say, but I truly believe those ppl are unfortunately dead...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jun 20, 2012 12:51:15 GMT -5
Yes, I think those two are dead and I also think that OJ was totally set up in that one. Those murders sound to me like professional jobs all the way.
That website is total bs as you stated artemis. hotman, I thought we discussed about you posting nonsense on the forum?
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 20, 2012 14:23:39 GMT -5
Regarding NICOLE&RON, there are 2 variants of their deaths:
1. They were eliminated by the Yakuza (misunderstanding over drug dealing)
2. They were eliminated by OJ's older son, JASON
Absolutely agree the whole OJ matter was nothing but a mediatic circus and most likely he was a scapegoat...
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jun 21, 2012 7:45:29 GMT -5
Or...OJ actually did it, but because he was a freemason, he got off the hook.
Hey, I have to throw something in on this discussion.....
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 21, 2012 8:57:35 GMT -5
Its alrite, Lucy, but Im 100% certain OJ was innocent. Being a freemason doesnt make u a murderer, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jun 21, 2012 13:40:51 GMT -5
But WHAT is nonsense????Lucy says"OJ actually did it",Artemis says"I'm 100% certain OJ was innocent". If people can not agree on that basic situation,how can we be sure of ANYTHING?What a website like this should do is put ALL ideas on the table no matter HOW strange they might be and present evidence to back up those ideas.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 21, 2012 14:36:04 GMT -5
Its each with his opinion, no big deal, HOTMAN. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, its like usual...
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 21, 2012 18:19:47 GMT -5
When it comes to media stories, especially big media stories, I question everything about them. In this case I am skeptical that these murders ever even took place.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jun 21, 2012 20:09:09 GMT -5
I think it would be hard to fake that murder. Unless all of the participants were all paid actors.
|
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jun 21, 2012 20:50:17 GMT -5
Just about all these"events",9/11,JFK assassination,Pearl Harbour,O.J. murders,etc. etc. were a set up for a BIGGER event.9/11-"War on Terror",JFK-Vietnam etc.etc. The O.J. situation was a set up for the CNN "24 hour news cycle" and"reality"TV. As we know much of JFK and 9/11 was faked or staged,so it makes sense that much of the O.J. thing was fake too. Of course WHAT was fake and what was real is an interesting question. Interesting to me is just about all of the main charactors new each other.O.J.'s lawyer,Robert Kardashian new everybody in the case and dies of cancer in 2003. His family goes on to great fame on reality TV. They all knew Nicole Simpson too. A lot of this case reminds me of Dallas and New Orleans in the JFK assassination. Everybody knows everybody else but of course it was NOT a conspiracy,LOL.
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 21, 2012 23:27:14 GMT -5
I think it would be hard to fake that murder. Unless all of the participants were all paid actors. Bingo. |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jul 24, 2012 11:52:39 GMT -5
Curt Russel is turning into Don Henley  |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 24, 2012 13:44:39 GMT -5
Not really...
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 24, 2012 14:07:20 GMT -5
Maybe it wasn't really OJ, but a replacement (F) OJ....I don't remember the original OJ with the enlarged head syndrome as the OJ on trial possessed...oh yes, the infamous fat head replacement...not to be confused with the long necked type....just a strange thing that many of the doubles we have discussed has larger heads than the originals...perhaps a kink in the DNA of mutated clones....
Now my previous post was more along the line of a "suppose". I haven't really stated whether I believe it was really him or a set up. Or...was there a fathead clone that did it?
Tis true that being a freemason automatically makes you a murder suspect....but if perhaps he was part of the "order" and he wasn't "behaving" maybe they made it look like he did it and made it appear he got off the hook.
It doesn't change the fact that Ron and Nicole were brutally murdered by someone....
Regarding Kurt Russell, he doesn't look like the Kurt I remember, but an aging clone ages much more "peculiarly" than regular people do. But I don't think he looks like Don Henley IMHO....
|
|
