And in the same vein, we can talk about the Ann Frank Diary! www.mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=614599 Why has the trial involving the father of Anne Frank, bearing directly on the authenticity of this book, never been "officially reported"? In royalties alone, Otto Frank has profited richly from the sale of this book, purporting to depict the tragic life of his daughter. But is it fact, or is it fiction? Is it truth or is it propaganda? Or is it a combination of all of these? And to what degree does it wrongfully appeal to the emotions through a misrepresentation as to its origin?
Free Will is YOURS when you understand that you can change your life's software program ANYTIME you focus!
Anne Frank did indeed exist and died horrifically of typhus in the german death camp at Bergen-Belsen after she and her sister Margot were discovered and seperated from the rest of their family by the Nazis. What happened with her diary is a different matter; what the public has been given is probably a heavily edited version, and that may be where the american ex-Esquire editor and columnist came in. It is perhaps toned down and diluted from the original to make it more "acceptable" to the public and the fascism-resurrecting powers that be, post-war. A girl in her early teens forced to live in hiding and seclusion in small rooms for years from german, fascist invaders merely because of her genetic lineage would, I think, probably express quite a bit more anger and outrage at the germans than we read in the edited(?) public edition. The diary bestseller is known for "breaking the silence" of the media in both Western Europe and the U.S./Canada on the Holocaust and Nazi extermination atrocities.