|
Post by beatlies on Oct 21, 2009 22:07:05 GMT -5
Oh, no, a vatican assassin? Meaning that the Roman Catholic Church was involved? Would not be surprised at that. They would kill their own if it meant to protect some secret. The "Fennon's" over the years seem to have different noses....jawlines and head shapes... How many were there? The "Lennon assassination" conveniently eclipsed in eyerone's minds the concurrent death squad masscre of seven Catholic nuns in El Salvador that same week in December 1980. Quite an embarassment for Carter's "hawk" war criminal national security czar, the Canadian-Polish Catholic Zbigniew Brzezinski who had helped the CIA engineer the installment of Polish, Nazi-collaborating Cardinal Karol Wojtyla as Pope John Paul II in 1978, and who had been siding with the El Salvadorean government against the "Marxist rebel-supporting" nuns and lower level clergy in El Salvador and the rest of Central/South America.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Nov 17, 2009 20:03:51 GMT -5
Dr. Stephen Lynn, allegedly the attending physician: www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0i28peF3Rk&feature=relatedTher are contradictory reports on such basics as the location of the bullet wounds and the shots fired and the number of bullets fired/wounds. An NYPD detective said "I've looked at this many times and teh ballistics make no sense."
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Nov 17, 2009 23:06:11 GMT -5
Something I was discussing with my sister yesterday regarding the "murder". If this was an exclusive apartment building where famous and/or rich people lived...wouldn't there be some sort of security around to notice any suspicious people?
Secondly, with someone shooting at "Lennon", you think there may have been some stray bullets that could have hit Yoko...hmm...Still not ruling out in my estimation that Yoko fired the shots that killed "Lennon".
But stands to be questioned that it was a "Fennon" who was shot and killed not the real John.
People just take these things as what really happened and don't question suspicious things surrounding these events.
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 18, 2009 3:15:58 GMT -5
The nurse said it didn't look like John Lennon, but "of course" it must have been, right?
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Nov 18, 2009 13:55:53 GMT -5
There was a picture posted at Paul is Dead Miss Him....that was supposed to be the "corpse" of John Lennon and what appeared to look like the ear and side of his face was melting...
I don't know if anyone is familiar with that picture...but it doesn't look like Lennon's profile.
What do we have here? A replacement getting shot...and a double for the replacement was the actual person killed?
Why?
Perhaps the Fennon of the late 70's was the person who was going to tell about what happened not only to Paul, but the real John...and they wanted him killed? Sounds possible...but who or what was the person laying on that stretcher with the melted looking face?
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 18, 2009 14:27:18 GMT -5
I'm thinking of a couple of possibilities.
"Lennon" could have been assassinated b/c he was about to reveal something, or there was fear he would be a catalyzing figure to resist the Agenda, or something of the like.
He could have been assassinated to distract from some other event that was going on. I believe Beatlies mentioned death squads in Honduras...?
If it was a clone, it may have reached the end of its useful life. The Carter clone/robotoid became dangerously unstable, according to Beter, so they tried to kill it in a marathon. Maybe this was a variation on a theme.
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 18, 2009 17:58:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lindsayjudy on Nov 27, 2009 5:09:45 GMT -5
All four Beatles were replaced with doubles, not because they were killed, but because they wanted to semi-retire and move on with their own interests and projects. Paul began to be replaced in 1965 with SOE agent Pearl Witherington and another fellow (Keith Allison?). John was replaced with Charlie Brill around October 1966 when Charlie acted in How I Won The War. Not sure about when the other two doubles came in. Revolver was the last true Beatles album.
John Lennon, the real one, is not dead. He's alive and living as Tony Sheridan, mostly in Germany. Go look at his website and watch him on YT. It's him. He was in Canada doing work under Klaatu. But when his double either was killed (for real or faked), the Beatles had to halt their work as Klaatu and stop releasing Klaatu albums in the US. He still hangs out in Ontario and has done Beatlefests as Tony. But he's a wanderer now because he has to be.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 27, 2009 7:44:43 GMT -5
All four Beatles were replaced with doubles, not because they were killed, but because they wanted to semi-retire and move on with their own interests and projects. Paul began to be replaced in 1965 with SOE agent Pearl Witherington and another fellow (Keith Allison?). John was replaced with Charlie Brill around October 1966 when Charlie acted in How I Won The War. Not sure about when the other two doubles came in. Revolver was the last true Beatles album. John Lennon, the real one, is not dead. He's alive and living as Tony Sheridan, mostly in Germany. Go look at his website and watch him on YT. It's him. He was in Canada doing work under Klaatu. But when his double either was killed (for real or faked), the Beatles had to halt their work as Klaatu and stop releasing Klaatu albums in the US. He still hangs out in Ontario and has done Beatlefests as Tony. But he's a wanderer now because he has to be. Yeah, heard it all before "n" times. All those clues mean nothing, they loved to play mental games/word play and they only got tired, pushed their doubles ahead and they are alive and well. Sorry, I dont buy this, seriously and I dont have any reason.
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 27, 2009 13:28:46 GMT -5
All four Beatles were replaced with doubles, Agreed Their own projects? Ok, except the doubles were the "solo Beatles..." Not that I don't think there's a possibility that SOE may have been involved at some level w/ Faul & the replacement, but I highly doubt PW was Bill. Bill doesn't look like Keith Allison. KA was the "official winner" of the Paul McCartney lookalike contest. It would have been too obvious if they'd installed him as Paul. They may have recruited another lookalike at the contest to be Paul, though. Agreed that John was replaced by Oct 1966. It seems to me Ringo was replaced between "Beatles for Sale" & "Help!" George has been harder to figure out, but probably by 1967. It doesn't seem to be him in Sgt. Pepper to me.
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 29, 2009 19:33:39 GMT -5
In the interview with the doctor about John/Fohm Lennon's assassination, he said all of John's bloodstained clothes were destroyed & that the body was cremated the next day without a funeral. There was no autopsy.
I wonder if it was standard operating procedure to destroy evidence in a murder investigation. They could have been charged with rendering criminal assistance in the 1st degree.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Nov 29, 2009 19:38:55 GMT -5
I think that no one was killed at the Dakota on Dec. 8, 1980. There were blanks fired by someone, Charlie Brill-Fennon was hsutled inside the dark archway, fake blood was spilled by Yoko, CIA cuban exile terrorist Jose Perdomo the doorman and probably other agents, and the whole fake was orchestrated down to the hospital doctor in charge and media cover-up.
There were bizarre and unexplained skyrocket fireworks nearby in Central Park that night, preceding the staged "assassination." Has that ever been explained either?
Charlie Brill went on to resume his B/C-level Hollywood career as Charlie Brill, with Mitzi McCall.
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 29, 2009 20:43:30 GMT -5
Everything was destroyed - even the medical records? Why were the records locked in a vault & not given to investigators? Why wasn't other evidence given to investigators? Questions about John Lennon's assassination plasticmacca.blogspot.com/2009/11/questions-about-john-lennons.htmlThere's obviously something very fishy about all of this!
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Nov 30, 2009 13:01:14 GMT -5
^ A couple of things the doctor said seem very odd to me:
"Two police officers and those were the only people who were there. Yoko Ono did not come in yet and in fact we were not 100 percent certain who this patient was. We didn't know who he was."
and -
"I was a neighbor to John Lennon. I knew John Lennon and Yoko and their son Sean as my neighbors. I saw them in the Japanese restaurant on the corner quite frequently. They walked the streets, they were in Central Park, their son Sean went to the same school -- Ethical Culture School -- that my daughter Rachel went to and they contributed to the same charities in the community that I did. I knew them as neighbors and friends and participants in my community."
He seemed to know him well yet didn't recognize him when they brought him in? Very odd.
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 30, 2009 13:41:11 GMT -5
Supposed death photo of "John"
|
|