|
Post by beatlies on Jan 19, 2011 19:31:26 GMT -5
Fohn Fennon-handler has The "Spirit of Hiroshima"?! Winner of the 8th Hiroshima Art Prize is Yoko Ono / e-flux Posted: 01/17/11 05:54 PM
Read More: Hiroshima Art Prize, Hiroshima Art Prize Yoko Ono, Yoko Ono, Yoko Ono Artist, Yoko Ono Hiroshima, Yoko Ono Wins Hiroshima Art Prize, Arts News share this story 60 views08 AP Get Arts Alerts Sign Up Submit this storydigg reddit stumble e-flux.com:
The City of Hiroshima has selected the winner of the 8th Hiroshima Art Prize, Ms. Yoko Ono (born 1933 in Tokyo, currently lives in New York).
About the Hiroshima Art Prize
Established by the City of Hiroshima in 1989, the Hiroshima Art Prize recognizes the achievements of artists who have contributed to the peace of humanity in the field of contemporary art, and through contemporary art aims to appeal to a wider world and the spread the "Spirit of Hiroshima," which seeks everlasting world peace. This prize is awarded once every three years.
Read the whole story: e-flux.com
In the past year Japan (the government, anyway) has lurched to the right, becoming pro-war and re-militarizing according to US dictates (see the recent trip to Tokyo by Bush/Cheney-Obama Defense Secretary Robert Gates). The previous Japan prime minister Hatoyama was replaced after becoming too rebellious against the US and US military occupation. The rigging of fake peace prizes like the Nobel peace prize or the "Hiroshima art prize" reflect the new propaganda push of the USA masters in East Asia against China and Russia. Whether it be for Japanese Featles-faker, spy elite, world war II Axis-enriched billionaire Yoko Ono or the anti-Chinese "dissident" Liu (the Nobel winner this year).
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 19, 2011 20:13:26 GMT -5
Who exactly is singing this? A Pepperpot member? They tell us it's John Lennon, who "had a cold that day"! A failed, early Fohn recording that somehow slipped through to public media distribution? www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVJwwLcV3KY&feature=relatedSounds like no "Beatle" that I ever heard....
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jan 19, 2011 21:03:27 GMT -5
^It's probably the real John Lennon. This guy:
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 19, 2011 21:19:32 GMT -5
A Hiroshima ART award to Yucko? Indeed the long term side effects of direct nuclear blasts...affects the victims of a city for generations....it affects their ability to discern "art" from glorified crap! Along with the fact she is part of Illuminati bloodline...
|
|
|
Post by bobthebuilder on Jan 20, 2011 8:24:46 GMT -5
Yes, it does. The *real* Lennon probably couldn't be controlled. Vladimir Lenin once said, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it." John was speaking out against Vietnam in 1966. Yoko, w/ Illuminati ties, came on the scene & pretty much derailed the anti-war movement & made it look ridiculous. Bagism? Is anyone really going to take that seriously? That's like something Monty Python would do - speak out agains the war while covered up in a freaking bag. Anyway, for more about how the ant-war movement was hi-jacked, see: MK-ULTRA & the '60's "counter-culture"Hi, first post here. I'd like to add that there was also the ridiculous moment when John/Fohn handed back his MBE. Firstly, turning up at Buckingham Palace in his Rolls Royce? Do you even have to turn up at the Palace to hand back such a thing? If John visibly turned up as to simply bring attention to the statement he was making, then surely he wouldn't be so stupid to do so in a Rolls of all things? EDIT: Did he turn up in his Rolls or am I mistaken? I can find info about the Beatles getting their MBE's, arriving in Lennon's Rolls, but struggling for a link about Lennon's Rolls and handing his back. Also, the statement he gave to the press, read as such: "Your Majesty - I am returning this MBE in protest against Britain's involvement in the Nigeria-Biafra thing, against our support of America in Vietnam, and against 'Cold Turkey' slipping down the charts. With love, John Lennon."'Your Majesty' - setting the statement as ludicrous already. 'The Nigeria-Biafra 'thing',' sounds flippant considering the supposed intent. 'against Cold Turkey slipping down the charts', is such a ridiculous comment in the context of what he was doing that it's nothing but damaging the supposed intent. The Times wrote the following day: 'The Times article of the next day, November 26, 1969, besides printing Lennon's explanatory letter (quoted above) also says: 'He said last night that he had been " mulling it over " for the past year or two and the Pinkville massacre had only contributed to his decision.'Mulling it over for a year or two, and this is the eventual statement he gave? It sounds more like a bit of wind up.
|
|
|
Post by bobthebuilder on Jan 20, 2011 14:50:50 GMT -5
I have an old book called 'John Lennon: Death Of A Dream', by George Carpozi Jnr. The book itself is a bit of a hodgepodge of info, and all it has something of a rushed feel about it - it actually says it was printed in 1980, so they certainly didn't waste any time from getting on the bandwagon. Anyway, the book contains an interveiw with Rick Sklar, a radio DJ and longtime personal associate of the Beatles, conducted by Martin A. Grove. An interesting tidbit from the interview: GROVE: I've recently been going through stacks of photographs of The Beatles, taken over a period of probably 10 years. Some of them are included in this book. As you look at their pictures it is, in many cases, actually difficult to identify the people in the latter period photographs with the people in the earlier photos. They physically do not look close to being the same. If you look at such a wide range of pictures you will find there's even a middle period in which the same people don't resemble the people in the late period or the early period! Why do you think all four of them went through so many physical changes?[/color] SKLAR: There's no question that they did go through these changes. There's no question the changes were real in terms of the productivity of the work they were doing, the type of work, their physical appearances, their outlook on life and that changes like these do not normally occur in an individual or group. In fact, most artists over the years try to reatin a certain youthfulness that they had earlier. They literally try to present the same face to the public. I imagine that - and I can only speculate here - the changes were caused by the intensity of the pubic reaction to them and its effect upon them. This was a very unusual experience for a human being to go through, and here four of them went through it. The thought of public reaction - reserved in ancient Rome for the Emperor, reserved in ancient Egypt for the Pharoah! It's very rare that you get this kind of reaction by a public to a human being, placing them in semi-Godlike status. That has to have some kind of an effect after time on the individuals involved, who after all are mere mortals. You know, they're people like us. And yet they're subject to this almost deification in the generation in which they are playing. In that ten year period that has to have an effect. Perhaps this is what we are seeing when we see them go through these intense changes unlike other groups of artists.So there you have it, according to Grove and Sklar the four Beatles went through some rather bizarre physical changes over the course of barely a decade, and Sklar puts an end to the question of why with the perfectly sensible suggestion that it was literally nothing more than public adulation that made there faces and bodies go through these noticable, incredible changes! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_SklarPrior to his death, Sklar had been an avid runner for more than ten years, taking it up in the late 1970's. He ran his first New York City Marathon in 1982, finishing 4 hours, 21 minutes, and 36 seconds; coming in 642nd out of 857 who finished the race in his age group. He began to have problems with his left foot, which necessitated him quitting the sport by 1990 [1].
In June of 1992, he entered Roosevelt Hospital in Manhattan for a minor operation that would allow him to run again. Although in good health, he died on the operating table due to a lack of oxygen and other mistakes made by the hospital staff.[1]
Sydelle Sklar died on December 7th of that same year, having lost her battle with cancer.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 22, 2011 7:48:11 GMT -5
To bobthebuilder: yes, Fohn and Yoko were being used as "Operation Chaos"/COINTELPRO-type media shills to embarass and discredit the left, and the anti-war movment and anti-imperialism. About this video, titled as being from 1962: 1) The "John" lead singer, with his thick, square-jawed, big nosed, mask-like face, does not appear to be the same man as in the leather jacket early John photo posted by The Mask, above. 2) It seems to me that the sound is dubbed and they are lip-synching. But "Twist and Shout was not released until 1963 with the Beatles first album, "Please Please Me" (double wording there, by the way, and also a double meaning plea to "choose me me!") www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4ZiBfbD2sU&feature=related
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jan 22, 2011 18:28:50 GMT -5
I have an old book called 'John Lennon: Death Of A Dream', by George Carpozi Jnr. The book itself is a bit of a hodgepodge of info, and all it has something of a rushed feel about it - it actually says it was printed in 1980, so they certainly didn't waste any time from getting on the bandwagon. Anyway, the book contains an interveiw with Rick Sklar, a radio DJ and longtime personal associate of the Beatles, conducted by Martin A. Grove. An interesting tidbit from the interview: GROVE: I've recently been going through stacks of photographs of The Beatles, taken over a period of probably 10 years. Some of them are included in this book. As you look at their pictures it is, in many cases, actually difficult to identify the people in the latter period photographs with the people in the earlier photos. They physically do not look close to being the same. If you look at such a wide range of pictures you will find there's even a middle period in which the same people don't resemble the people in the late period or the early period! Why do you think all four of them went through so many physical changes?[/color] SKLAR: There's no question that they did go through these changes. There's no question the changes were real in terms of the productivity of the work they were doing, the type of work, their physical appearances, their outlook on life and that changes like these do not normally occur in an individual or group. In fact, most artists over the years try to reatin a certain youthfulness that they had earlier. They literally try to present the same face to the public. I imagine that - and I can only speculate here - the changes were caused by the intensity of the pubic reaction to them and its effect upon them. This was a very unusual experience for a human being to go through, and here four of them went through it. The thought of public reaction - reserved in ancient Rome for the Emperor, reserved in ancient Egypt for the Pharoah! It's very rare that you get this kind of reaction by a public to a human being, placing them in semi-Godlike status. That has to have some kind of an effect after time on the individuals involved, who after all are mere mortals. You know, they're people like us. And yet they're subject to this almost deification in the generation in which they are playing. In that ten year period that has to have an effect. Perhaps this is what we are seeing when we see them go through these intense changes unlike other groups of artists.[/quote] Good catch. Thanks for posting.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 23, 2011 2:07:54 GMT -5
1979 TV movie Young Love, First Love with Valerie Bertinelli and Timothy Hutton. It features Charlie Brill as Valerie's high school teacher "Mr. Quinlan." 1979 was a year of mostly-missing-from-NYC Fohn Fennon, where he was little seenin the public eye. While Charlie was back in Los Angeles doing television productions. Interesting that this roll end titles song allegedly sung by Valerie sounds rather like Yucko Ono in her fragile, little girl voice mode of singing. An inside joke? Valerie, like John/Fohn, also has a "Eurasian" look to her face. www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfbkGb4iOWk
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 23, 2011 2:26:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jan 23, 2011 4:56:32 GMT -5
1979 TV movie Young Love, First Love with Valerie Bertinelli and Timothy Hutton. It features Charlie Brill as Valerie's high school teacher "Mr. Quinlan." 1979 was a year of mostly-missing-from-NYC Fohn Fennon, where he was little seenin the public eye. While Charlie was back in Los Angeles doing television productions. Interesting that this roll end titles song allegedly sung by Valerie sounds rather like Yucko Ono in her fragile, little girl voice mode of singing. An inside joke? Valerie, like John/Fohn, also has a "Eurasian" look to her face. www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfbkGb4iOWkYeah, I noticed, despite wiki says she's Irish-Italian. Could be, but we live in the era of disinfo. I havent got to research her yet, but from what I noticed, its possible she got replaced too.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 24, 2011 5:31:27 GMT -5
A painfully unfunny John BrilLennon and Mitzi McCalltney on The Johnny Cash show, September 6, 1969. After "Abbey Road" and the CIA false flag Charlie Fanson Hollywood killings were all wrapped up, with aftermath psy-ops underway. The musical guests accompanying Charlie Brill and Mitzi McCall on this episode were the Canadian folk duo IAN & SYLVIA. Ian has been suggested here in previous posts as a likely candidate for one of the John Lennon imposters used. So this Johnny Cash Show episode was a winking "John Lennons" Reunion fest? www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw-LS0-53nM&feature=relatedIan and Sylvia, the same show with Charlie Brill and Mitzi McCall above, Sep. 6, 1969: www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuQRGzU6iOQ&feature=related
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 24, 2011 20:45:44 GMT -5
"Charlie Brill" looks like Peter Sellers...certainly doesn't look like the Star Trek John Lennon Brill!
So, was there a fake Charlie while he was living as Lennon?
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 25, 2011 1:45:39 GMT -5
"Charlie Brill" looks like Peter Sellers...certainly doesn't look like the Star Trek John Lennon Brill! So, was there a fake Charlie while he was living as Lennon? Still trying to figure this out lucy.... the close shot photo of Charlie Brill's profile on the back cover of the 1969 album "Hoo Ha" (parody of Hee Haw) shows what look like plastic surgery scars on Charlie's face; I'm theorizing that Charlie had subdermal fillers implanted when he had to impersonate Lennon, then removed when it was time to return to his real identity. Or they may have had a Fharlie Frill impostering Charlie when he was on Lennon duty, or both. Definitely though, Ed Sullivan Beatles Debut-Brill looks radically different from Tribbles-KlingonSpy-Brill looks radically different from Johnny Cash-Brill. But I can't say for sure yet. Still, to me it appears certain that Brill as a Fennon, perhaps the main one of the late '60s and '70s. And according to the memoir book Dakota Days, Yoko Ono told her personal assistant to refer to John Lennon as "Charlie" and "Charlie Swan" in the confines of their home.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jan 25, 2011 3:44:52 GMT -5
I for one believe that Brill was once a Fennon...
|
|