|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 16, 2008 23:46:02 GMT -5
While we have discussed many of the strange cosmetic surgeries of the celebrities we have observed to have been replaced, or programmed and how they look so different.
While standing in the checkout line, and I wished I remember which of the magazines at the register I had seen, but two different celebrities of two different magazines and why they look so different.
One of them was Angelina Jolie and the other Madonna.
Now what struck me funny was both of these women we have discussed being replaced or being "stepforded" and apparently the topic of discussion among the general public to cause the "system" to print these articles regarding the surgeries and how they look so different as though this will halt any speculation on what has become of these women.
When this subject comes up on a popular magazine, and it's not a tabloid, it has me thinking they are trying to do "damage control" by spinning some web of lies to explain away the differences in their looks, and thinking that will stop any speculation.
Trying to cover their tracks or repair cracks in their "walls", just makes me wonder about all of their spinning...
|
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Dec 17, 2008 0:14:55 GMT -5
^ I wonder how many of "them" lurk on forums like this? I'm positive there are disinfo agents on the David Icke forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 17, 2008 21:55:38 GMT -5
I'm sure of it. I'm sure that there are folks even lurking on PID or PWR forums because there are subjects of other celebrities and scandals discussed there as well.
It just makes me wonder why such stories coming up at about the same time...
|
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Dec 18, 2008 18:17:47 GMT -5
Plastic surgery is a big issue for sure, and its not just to make the stars look prettier/younger. Its obvious that when you have younger and younger stars getting surgery for NO reason, and even older stars who look more bizarre/ugly WITH surgery, something's up. My theory has always been that they are normalizing the rest of society to seeing strange looking faces because of the strong alien presence on this planet right now. That way, when we see odd looking people with fishlips and balloon cheekboness we won't be surprised. It will all be explained away by surgery. Just take a look at how many people now think plastic surgery freaks are beautiful, while more natural looking people are "ugly" A good example of this is Megan Fox www.makemeheal.com/news/images/megan-fox-nose-job.jpgNow I KNOW a lot of people out there like the way she looks, but.....be honest with yourself. Does she look like a warm natural woman.........or a cold android type of beauty?   To me there is nothing beautiful about this woman. Female beauty comes from within, a natural smile, a warmth and aura about a person Marilyn had this. I heard Megan Fox interviewed, she literally had not a thought in her head. Nothing. Empty inside. I laughed out loud when I read that Megan Fox has a tattoo of Marilyn Monroe. No way in HELL she could ever compare to Marilyn (who for all her mind control still had a SOUL!) Megan looks like a robot, yet no one else sees this! This is what is considered "beautiful" these days. Over made up, frozen faced zombies. And people are BUYING it!!!!!!! Add to that fact that almost 100% of stars get some kind of surgery no matter what. I am also convinced that the botox phenomenon, which both wealthy and famous women inject into their faces all the time has side effects of which they are not being made aware. This is not just for youth. Take a look at Nicole Kidman [Ficole...I guess] She just doesn't look right. The chemicals in botox DO something. They actually change brain chemistry, memory and personality. They may also be changing DNA. This is not just about "beauty" something is going on here. |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Dec 18, 2008 19:11:45 GMT -5
^ Interesting comments -- thanks for posting.
|
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Dec 18, 2008 20:33:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Dec 19, 2008 11:42:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Dec 19, 2008 16:14:07 GMT -5
^ Very good point Sabrina!  You should post this on Doubles and clones too! Megan Fox is very suspicious. A little too perfect... Could very well be a gynoid.  To me, it's all about the eyes. The window to the soul. If there is no light in the eyes, if it's empty - then you should be suspicious to what it is exactly that you're dealing with. I see what you mean in your examples. But Liv Tyler looks kinda cold in her first pic... There is also some recemblance between Megan and Fangelina AND they are tattoed in the same way (or marked as I think is a more proper term for it).  |
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Dec 19, 2008 20:29:20 GMT -5
Wow! I just found this Chanel commercial with Nicole Kidman! Its so weird, apparently it cost 47 million dollars to make. Its a monologue and the narrator says: " I must have been the only person in the world who didn't know who she was...The disappearance of the world's most famous [unintelliglble].." then they flash newspaper headlines that say "GONE" "Emotional Breakdown" etc. www.youtube.com/watch?v=bU9A-kpiTfMit starts at 0:12 |
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Dec 20, 2008 19:03:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Dec 20, 2008 21:54:03 GMT -5
^ Yes, she does resemble Natalie. Interesting.
And, yes, there was a lot that was fishy (no pun intended) about
Natalie's death.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 21, 2008 14:13:58 GMT -5
I think there is an epidemic among the rich and famous of looking strange, not necessarily prettier or younger, but strange.
|
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Jan 6, 2009 11:02:12 GMT -5
The new ad campaign for Nip/Tuck is mighty suspcious. I flagged Nip/Tuck as a show that is softening people up for the AGENDA of plastic surgery and whatever underlying significance it speaks to for the powers that be (I.e. coverup for aliens) Now it seems to be indicating cloning. See here: www.fxnetworks.com/niptuck/You've got the two identical looking guys on the operating table and the vaguely German looking 1930's showgirl/nurse standing over them. Then the ads for the show depict multiples of these same hollywood 'showgirls' spinning in a Busby Berkeley-esque montage in between numerous syringes. Here's the youtube link to the commercial www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOs_501orGE&feature=relatedYou'll notice that the girls in the commercial are depicted playing with a red ribbon which symbolizes bloodline and genetics, so that's another clue. Then one of them pulls off a pearl necklace and when the pearls scatter, a single pearl is framed by the syringes. This symbolizes the female egg being tampered with artificially. Then they show another series of girls this time dressed in the mod sixties style, showing us how their tampering evolved over time to create different types of perfect females. A red rose is encircled by disembodied legs giving us a hint as to who is behind this Knights Templar ?? etc.  Also, the tagline for this season is 'TIMELESS BEAUTIES'. Yes, timeless, because if a person is a clone they will live forever, so to speak. This also suggests that they re-use successful DNA in hollywood.I had also noticed that the new method of plastic surgery is using stem cells injected into the body which can alter a person's DNA code, so there's defenitely something genetic running parallell to plastic surgery as an overall goal. Botox injections would also alter the genetic code of the user. |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Jan 7, 2009 0:12:01 GMT -5
Christina Ricci. She's lost a lot of weight.... but here....she looks so much like Natalie Wood. Great observation! Perhaps they share DNA?  |
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 7, 2009 0:46:43 GMT -5
"You'll notice that the girls in the commercial are depicted playing with a red ribbon which symbolizes bloodline and genetics, so that's another clue."
The red ribbon around the neck was also a reference to the nobles who lost their heads in the French Revolution.
|
|
