|
Post by bzzerk on Apr 3, 2011 20:54:23 GMT -5
Does this also remind you of a scene from the movie Bruce Almighty? Check it out..
|
|
|
Post by bzzerk on Apr 3, 2011 20:59:23 GMT -5
I could be reading too much into this, but check out the position of the 'driver's' thumb..It's behind her neck which gives the impression he's actually holding/restraining her as opposed to resting his arm around her like you would in a friendly situation. Could he possibly be pressing on a pressure point? Also, the look on her face makes it look like she's sedated in some way.
|
|
|
Post by msmoonlite on Apr 3, 2011 21:15:03 GMT -5
She does look tranced out. Her whole body seems to be in an altered state. Kind of looks like what it probably is, her handler handling her. Can't explain the choke hold on her neck. Could be a programming move.
|
|
|
Post by goro on Apr 4, 2011 8:29:05 GMT -5
She does look tranced out. Her whole body seems to be in an altered state. Kind of looks like what it probably is, her handler handling her. Can't explain the choke hold on her neck. Could be a programming move. I'm reminded of that one Britney Spears breakdown in which she was loose in New York, I believe - the sad story of her trying to check into a luxury hotel (forget which one) by herself for some privacy while she was in the middle of an emotional meltdown; she had no money or credit cards on her; she had the number written down for one credit card but the hotel desk people wouldn't run that through without a physical card. Britney wasn't doing well and some nice people who were checking in took pity on her and let her sit in their room for a while. Eventually Britney's "handlers" came and got her. I think moves like Lourdes' handler are doing are physically aggressive warning controls to remind her that she's not allowed to escape, even though she's in a big city. They don't want another "Britney" situation.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 4, 2011 9:09:25 GMT -5
OMG! Great info on Brit, poor soul! And dont forget shes still into Kabbalah since coopted by FADONNA.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Apr 4, 2011 12:59:26 GMT -5
OMG! Great info on Brit, poor soul! And dont forget shes still into Kabbalah since coopted by FADONNA. Are we talking about Britney (what a name...) or Fritney at this point? To speak of a real "Britney" actually being a real person with real interests such as Kabbalah may be just playing into the hands of our Operation Mockinbird Media's deceptions. In other words, it's ALL fake and it's all a show to manipulate and control the masses. This issue has come up before with other replaCIAed celebrities and "their" i.e. their imposters' current interests, hobbies, religions, spouses, children, drug addictions, sex lives etc. etc.
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Apr 4, 2011 13:16:10 GMT -5
I am sure it is most likely Fritney.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 4, 2011 14:17:52 GMT -5
Til some proof I still think its Britney, although I pointed out a few times that she may have been replaced. Replaced or not, what are they doing to her is beyond words.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 5, 2011 4:18:49 GMT -5
"Now another of Madonna's charities is investigated amid claims of financial mismanagement
A second of Madonna’s charities is being investigated over alleged financial mismanagement.
Educational charity Success for Kids, which the singer chairs, is being probed by the FBI for ‘several irregularities and suspicious activity’.
It is not clear the extent to which Madonna is involved in the investigation but she has donated $671,000 (£415,000) since it was founded in 2001.
She has also persuaded a string of celebrity friends to give generously.
The development comes a week after it emerged that the Material Girl had to scrap plans to build a school in Malawi due to financial mismanagement by another of her charities.
Raising Malawi abandoned the project because the £2.4million already spent had been frittered away on needless luxuries.
The latest blow will be another setback for Madonna and raises the prospect she could be drawn into a federal tax probe in the U.S.
It will doubtless add to her ‘frustration’ that the school project ran aground but experts claimed it raised serious questions over both charities and her involvement in them.
Success for Kids is an offshoot of Raising Malawi and has raised $33million (£20.4million) since 2001 with Madonna being by far its biggest cheerleader.
It describes itself as ‘the largest international social emotional learning organisation in the world’ with offices in eight countries, including Malawi.
Success for Kids and Raising Malawi split in 2008 but both appear to have got into financial difficulties some time afterwards.
A investigation initiated by Madonna found that at Raising Malawi there was a ‘startling lack of accountability’ with the management and a string of ‘outlandish expenditures’.
In one case, two cars were bought for employees that hadn't even been hired. Some of the £2.4million still hasn't been accounted for, said the audit.
Madonna, 52, who adopted a daughter, Mercy, from Malawi last year and a son, David, in 2008, was not implicated in the financial mismanagement.
A separate report last week claimed Madonna’s Kabbalah religion and Raising Malawi were also being investigated in the U.S for tax irregularities.
Members of a grand jury have supposedly been subpoenaed to ask questions of both organisations.
They will be looking into the Kabbalah Centre, Raising Malawi and the Berg family who own it.
Ken Berger, president of the U.S. charity watchdog Charity Navigator, said the developments were highly unusual.
‘First of all, most charities are not investigated,' he said.
‘Multiple investigations going on at once is quite extraordinary’.
Success for Kids, the Kabbalah Centre, Raising Malawi and Madonna all declined to comment."
|
|
|
Post by goro on Apr 5, 2011 10:10:46 GMT -5
Til some proof I still think its Britney, although I pointed out a few times that she may have been replaced. Replaced or not, what are they doing to her is beyond words. Good point. Sad thing is, whether the replacements are hired performers who knowingly sign up to be replacements or if they're clones, THEY get just as horribly abused as the originals - much, much worse, actually, since the original often isn't around very long. And since they've signed on to a deceptive life totally controlled by their handlers, they have NO advocates, no help. I imagine they have no independent money (as I related in the above post about Britney/Fitney trying to check into that luxury NYC hotel with no money on her). And I would imagine many of them don't have a Social Security Number anymore, or a legal identity other than the "fake" one they've assumed. Sad stuff. No wonder they can never break out.
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Apr 5, 2011 10:45:46 GMT -5
Til some proof I still think its Britney, although I pointed out a few times that she may have been replaced. Well I didn't even look at pics and I knew she was replaced. Simply because that's how this game works. In my experience, no-one makes it through that to be that big of a celebrity without being replaced at least once. Britney Spears Already cloned? Fritney# 1 Fritney# 2 Fritney# 3 I think Fritney# 2 is the image people think of when they think of Britney. Fritney# 1 is the Mouseketeer-era Britney and Fritney# 3 is how she has looked recently. That's how I see it. Any input is welcome.
|
|
|
Post by goro on Apr 5, 2011 12:56:59 GMT -5
I think Britney has been replaced at least once, but part of this is informed by a site I saw years ago - clicking on other links from a celeb gossip site - which was sort of a humor site that had a page about "The Mystery of Britney's Ever-Changing Breast Size." In it it showed how in a relatively short period of time she went from a flat A cup to much bigger boobs, to slightly smaller boobs, to really big ones again (and this was all before her first pregnancy) and the incredible weirdness of it all instantly made me go "This can't just be explained by someone who was pressured into getting bigger boobs and then had them removed due to infections, discomfort, or scarring" which so often happens in these cases. Because it was like, small ones, huge ones, smaller ones, huge ones, tiny ones again, bigger ones - at that point I remember thinking, "Well some of these must be a stand in or body double or something." Or something is right!
Some of the Brit's in Mask's photo sample have a thicker, Cupid-like upper lip, but this isn't looking like the results of lip injections/collagen to me because her lips don't have that "trout pout" - it's just her upper lip suddenly looks much more rounded than the completely flat upper lip the earlier Brits had.
Brit definitely had a nose job, and/or the replacement had a thinner nose, too.
But what is most telling to me is the distance between the early Brit's nose and inner eyes. There's a lot of space there. Later versions of Brit don't have that wide space between the edge of the nose and the edge of the inner eye. Do you guys and gals see this? That is what is selling the replacement idea to me the most.
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Apr 5, 2011 13:03:03 GMT -5
But what is most telling to me is the distance between the early Brit's nose and inner eyes. There's a lot of space there. Later versions of Brit don't have that wide space between the edge of the nose and the edge of the inner eye. Do you guys and gals see this? That is what is selling the replacement idea to me the most. Yes, I noticed this right away. Eye distance is quite different.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 5, 2011 14:48:55 GMT -5
Finally, time for my BRITNEY SPEARS input here. Mask's post is more relevant, so I dont know of how much use mine will be. I remember very well a famous documentary on this troubled soul and I was deeply impressed by her strong and powerful singing voice while she was just a young girl and I couldnt help comparing it to her actual one; voice/the voice we all know. How on earth, I said to myself, a voice like Joss Stone's has turned into the baby/high pitched one? What happened to her real voice, her real talent? I assume mind control changed that too... Notice the difference in the body in the last pics. And btw these BRITNEY posts should be moved where they belong, either MY LIST, either REPLACED OR NOT REPLACED. Hope noone disagrees that As far as her replacement goes, I believe she followed or rather to say she was forced to follow the same pattern as AGUILERA, which means by 2001 BRIT was already gone. The real BRIT, obviously Beginnings 2000 2007 2008 2009 2010 Last week At random
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 5, 2011 15:11:55 GMT -5
Hint? And dont forget the vids for TOXIC and WOMANIZER also hinting at multiple BRITNEY's and MK/split personalities at the same time.
|
|