|
Post by artemis on Jul 9, 2010 6:33:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 14, 2010 4:44:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 17, 2010 8:16:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nachtlicht on Jul 18, 2010 7:42:42 GMT -5
This is my take on the entire industry of "celebrity". There is a hidden system of "celebrity" industry. Making and breaking individuals by a "system" of individuals who have authority and position to choose those who become celebrities, how long those people are famous, and those they choose to manipulate by using them in pathetic publicity like the "pop stars" in music,for example. So many desire this position of fame and fortune, but do these people realize the price they pay and still choose to be famous? Do they realize it going in, or during the process? Is it really worth it? Very interesting, I´m so happy that I found this board here over the David Icke board. This board here is so awesome! I always thought that I´m the only one who "see´s" that certain people on tv and media look just like a simulation of a human. At the start they all look normal and even nice, also Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston or Brad Pitt, they all looked really sweet and as they had a good heart, but suddenly with the years they lost their identity and their inner self got replaced by darkness or something strange. Possession? By reptilians? Or are they clones and the originals got killed in satanic rituals? Or could it even be --- that the originals had so much money that they went to mars and let their clones back on earth so nobody knows it? i mean imagine a company who saves people from war etc and says "we can bring you to mars its a nice planet without any hate and problems just give us 750 million $ and we will replace you on earth by a clone who simulates you (!)... could this be true? its a interesting theory.. i have many ideas like that...
|
|
|
Post by nachtlicht on Jul 18, 2010 8:32:49 GMT -5
tritontimes.wikidot.com/guns-n-roses-rockstar-axl-rose-dead-at-45July 20, 2007 Nettra Pan One of hard rock’s greatest frontmen, Axl Rose of Guns N’ Roses (GN’R), died last night in his Malibu mansion from unknown causes. He was 45.Rose’s assistant, Beta Lebeis, 46, found Rose’s body draped across the living room sofa at 6:30 this morning. He was surrounded by old GN’R vinyl records, wearing torn boxer shorts. “He wouldn’t reply when I spoke to him,” Lebeis added, “That’s when I saw his face and knew I had to call 911.” Malibu County Medical Examiner Dr. Karl Smith has been assigned to carry out the autopsy, which has been scheduled to start at 9 this morning. The results should be available by noon, Smith said. No other information regarding the cause of Rose’s death has yet been released.Last August, Rose was diagnosed with having low blood pressure and low blood sugar. He has also been diagnosed as bipolar, and manic-depressive, falling into a deep depression in 1993 following the departure of his ex-girlfriend, Stephanie Seymour. His half-sister, Amy Bailey, 40, says that this was unrelated to his death because of the medication he has been regularly taking for several years now. “Axl has laid off of the rockstar lifestyle he used to have,” Bailey said of Rose, who at 16, was a “full-fledged juvenile delinquent”. Bailey last talked to Rose Sunday evening, “He was fine, then,” she said. Rose’s other half-sibling, Stuart Bailey could not be reached for comment.
|
|
|
Post by nachtlicht on Jul 18, 2010 8:43:07 GMT -5
I just found this page and the message about the autopsy and death of the singer Axl Rose. Holy sh*t! This is the best message I ever hear about a replacement! So he´s dead but at the same time he´s on media again and does interviews months later, right. oh what a message! now we have a really big evidence that they replaced axl rose.. and after they released the new album on novemer 2008 (in germany it was november 2008) axl rose disapeared for 2 months... so they not even had a axl rose that was able to do interviews... or what? are clones or synthetic ones able to think and do interviews? lets search for a interviews and study it, wait let me search..
oh i found not one interview! now isn´t this strange? axl rose dead message... than axl rose gives concerts 2009 and 2010... and not one interview about the new album from november 2008..
how strange is this? its a replacement...would like to know why they do this... i want to know everythng about this now because i was since i´m 9 years old the biggest guns n roses fan and now this happens...
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 18, 2010 9:18:10 GMT -5
There's already an AXL ROSE thread.
|
|
|
Post by nachtlicht on Jul 18, 2010 9:28:09 GMT -5
There's already an AXL ROSE thread. yeah an I started it minutes after i made this posting here! Who are you? The police of this board or who? I don´t like the angry mood you have at all.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 18, 2010 11:52:50 GMT -5
I have to wonder if some of these celebrities were evil from the start, and just used a nice "image" to gain fans and popularity to the extent that people will actually imitate them by their hair, clothes they wear, etc. People do tend to have these role models when they don't have a very high esteem of themselves, or who cannot find better "role models" close in their own lives that they attach to famous people as if these famous people really gave a rat's caboose about fans. They only care about the money and popularity. It's like a drug with these people. The more fame and adoration they get, the more they want. They feel like they have a power. They speak about something and people love them because of something they said or did.
It's almost like a religion to some fans. But these celebrities, for the most part, have agents who match them to certain "causes" to support to make them look like good guys because they support "causes" and give money to "causes" which they get reimbursed in their tax refunds.
There may be a rare few famous people who have a true cause because it happened close to someone they cared about...but it still draws attention to themselves..more than the "cause".
They have an agenda...whether it's part of their make up, their upbringing, or programming.
|
|
|
Post by nachtlicht on Jul 18, 2010 12:01:30 GMT -5
Boy, this is a drawing - not a real girl! So don´t ask ever again a question like this!
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jul 18, 2010 16:46:43 GMT -5
I have to wonder if some of these celebrities were evil from the start ... Yes, I think so. And, I think some of the most evil ones have the appearance of being the most innocent and friendly.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 19, 2010 3:45:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 19, 2010 14:17:17 GMT -5
I am concerned at any "newcomer" on the scene. IF they are not already synthetic drones from the beginning? Not like those synthetic looking replacements we talk about, but just someone that was created and has no personality, but just a "celebrity" created to sell records, movie tickets, etc.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 23, 2010 10:43:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 27, 2010 4:20:38 GMT -5
|
|