|
Post by sherlok on Nov 27, 2008 11:45:48 GMT -5
Rosie was branded crazy by the media when she dared to question the Iraq war, the Bush administration, 9/11 and other taboo subjects. She "left" (was fired) from her daytime show and remained mostly out of sight for a time. Now "Rosie" is back with her new prime time variety show and promises not to discuss politics "because it's not the best use of my talents." Maybe she hasn't been replaced -- I'm not sure, but she sure seems to be re-programmed: She even jokes about being crazy in the promos for her new show here: www.rosie.com/rosielive.aspx
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 27, 2008 15:46:56 GMT -5
Stepford Rosie! I like. This is good Sherlok... It's too early to judge just on this clip but it will be interesting to see what will happen in that show. The idea that a troublemaker like Rosie get's programmed to be more submissive is not far fetched at all. On the contrary, this is probably used quite often... I do think I see the "Stepford glow" on Rosie in that ad Of course it's also very tragic if this is true... Let's also not forget that Rosie and Madonna (a mind controlled sex kitten, among others) are best friends: www.chinadaily.com.cn/showbiz/2007-01/12/content_781902.htmWho else can be a Stepford?
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Nov 27, 2008 16:20:19 GMT -5
Who else can be a Stepford? Not sure if this is what you mean but maybe Charlie Sheen? He did a similar thing. He came out publicly and said 9/11 should be investigated and also said he would narrate the next version of "Loose Change" (9/11 documentary). But, then he suddenly clammed up about the whole subject when he got a new TV series.
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 27, 2008 16:30:01 GMT -5
Interesting about Charlie. Of course they might "just" have been threatened, they're extra vulnerable when they have families and kids too. But programming is def an option! Let's find more Stepfords!
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 28, 2008 13:38:16 GMT -5
Did they "Stepford" Jane Fonda?She went from being very radical and politically active to this: Guess someone taught her to keep her priorities straight
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 29, 2008 0:18:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Nov 29, 2008 16:18:24 GMT -5
The real Jane looked like her father Henry Fonda. The latter Jane looks like a mannequin.
Now I don't know if it's due to being in B/W, but are the real Jane's eyes dark?
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Nov 29, 2008 16:23:00 GMT -5
With regards to Rosie, or any celeb for that matter, when it seems to be a sudden change of character and/or points of view regarding issues and being very vocal about things and then suddenly complying, I do have to wonder if there is some sort of mind control, and if mind control can cause someone to have a different "look" in their eyes, something like a robotoid, or whatever someone called it?
If this mind control causes the celebs to have a different personality, or if it's some sort of technology that can create another "being" to resemble one that is famous...something like cloning, but rather than being totally "flesh and blood" but part human, and part electronic?
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 29, 2008 16:31:11 GMT -5
"Now I don't know if it's due to being in B/W, but are the real Jane's eyes dark?" I think Jane's eyes were dark, but I haven't found any good pictures yet. The replacement seems to have light eyes. "If this mind control causes the celebs to have a different personality, or if it's some sort of technology that can create another "being" to resemble one that is famous...something like cloning, but rather than being totally "flesh and blood" but part human, and part electronic?" Lostworld posted this at doppels.proboards99.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=60&page=1:1. Actual Clones This is a person who has been grown from a test tube (called "in vitro") or implanted womb, which has the identical genetic makeup to another person--an identical twin so to speak in terms of genetic makeup. The genetic coding has reproduced, and a new person who is an identical twin is now in existence. 2. Synthetic People These are "persons" who look everybit as real as a real person, but simulate human beings. Certain tissues extracted from cattle are the starting point. (This is part of the reason for cattle mutilations.) The process is an advancement of a process discovered in the late 1950’s. This 1959 experiment was reported in a book in 1968 called The Biological Time Bomb by Gordon Rettray Taylor. Taylor describes the experiment done in France, "They had extracted DNA from the cells of the khaki Cam phells and had injected it into the white Pekins, thinking that just possibly the offspring of the latter might show some character derived from khaki Campbells. To their astonishment the actual ducks they injected began to change. Their white feathers darkened, and their necks began to take on the peculiar curve which is a mark of the khaki Campbell." The scientists working under the auspices of the Rothschilds, (who are directed by Satan himself) developed this process by working at secret breakneck speed. They developed an advanced development of the process they discovered with the DNA chicken experiment. By the late 1970’s, synthetic people could be produced by the Illuminati. 3. Organic Robotoids This is an "artificial life" form that is created through processes that are totally different than cloning or synthetics. Organic robotoid technology is being made to make exact as possible copies of important people such as Presidents and some of their staff. For instance, the Jimmy Carter who came to Portland a few years ago who I stood two feet away from and examined visually was not the Jimmy Carter that had run for President. On Easter, 1979 the first robotoid model of Jimmy Carter replaced the man Jimmy Carter. By the time "Carter" was seen by me, they must have been on at least robotoid no. 100. This is why a friend of mine who was recently in Washington D.C. almost bumped into President Clinton jogging. My friend was surprised by the lack of security. Kaiser Aluminum News which is put out by Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation put out a series of articles to a specialized audience in the 1960’s. This material was also published under the book title The Dynamics of Change (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1967). Under the title heading "GENETIC MANIPULATION" we read, "The ability to control the formation of new beings may be one of the most basic developments of the future. Recent discoveries about the nucleonic acids, the basic building blocks of life, have led to the belief that man may some day be able to treat genes in such a way that desired characteristics can be realized..." Under the heading "MAN-MACHINE SYMBIOSIS" we read, "...Computers exist which can learn, remember, see, seek goals, reason, walk, sing on key, talk, be irritable, play games, grasp, adapt to an environment and even design improvements in themselves.. .man-like computers may one day contain plasma circulating through a viscera-like envelope, allowing them to be self-healing." Under the heading "HUMAN ROBOTS" we read, "...An electronic circuit that imitates two neurons, the cells of the human brain, has been built, and has enabled a robot to deal with some unexpected situations, but the neuron structure was bulky. The brain has billions of neurons, meaning an incredible miniaturization job will be necessary before truly ‘human’ robots are developed." As the reader knows since the 1960’s when this was written an incredible miniaturation job has been done in computers. What the public knows of that minituration is incredible and that is only part of what has actually occurred. In fact, scientists are now able to manipulate DNA to create computers. A basic thing that is needed to create a computer is material that will consistently change given some type of "signal". This is because the computer works off of base two--or what is simply an on--off switch system, or a 0 or 1 system of numbers. Living biological material is superior to other material for making computers because the heat created by the methods in conventional computers slows the speed. For super-computers to work at great speeds they need to use biological material that will not heat up. This type of miituration has already been done. It creates computers far beyond what we are familiar with. Organic robotoids are amazingly humanlike, so humanlike that it is hard for the scientists who have created them to get used to the idea that they are not humans. Biological computer brains for the robotiods Page 311 ... came as a result of research into holograms. If you tear up a conventional photograph you ruin it, but if you tear up the film that produces a hologram, each piece still contains almost all the same image. This is why part of the brain of people can be removed and the brain regain what it had lost. A holographic image of a person’s brain is made, and then when the brain of a robotoid is made, the biological computer in its head is caused to form according to the holographic record of a person being copied. Some deviations from the holographic record are needed, because the "person" is a robotoid and not a person. The brain of the robotoid has almost all of the correct memory of the person reproduced, but the robotoid brain is really a computer made from biological material which is programmed, it is not a human brain. First, "Clinton" has the energy to jog because it may well be a robotoid, and second thing, an assassination of a robotoid is not so serious. These robotoids have a biological computer-brain that is programmed. They can think in the sense a computer thinks, but secret advances in understanding the human brain, have allowed the makers of organic robotoids to have the memory of a person at a given point in time transferred to an organic robotoid. The key then for making what appears to be a clone--but they are not a real clone--is to capture the person to be copied and make a holographic copy of the brain memory and transfer that to the robotoid.... From "Deeper insights into the Illuminati formula" by Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler educate-yourself.org/mc/deeperinsightsbook.shtml
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 29, 2008 19:31:42 GMT -5
No movies between 1990 and 2005 ? (IMBd) Jane's eyes seems to be blue all the way though, unless photomanipulated In this pic her eyes can first appear to be dark, same thing with photos from the movie Barbarella - but if you look real close her eyes are deep blue, not brown.
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Dec 1, 2008 13:12:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Dec 2, 2008 13:14:17 GMT -5
Maybe I should have called this thread Kamikaze Rosie. The media is telling us her new show tanked and pointing out that it's because everybody hates Rosie. www.cnn.com/video/#/video/showbiz/2008/12/02/sbt.rosie.bombs.cnnA 70's style variety TV show with guests like an ancient Liza Minelli cavorting on stage -- gosh, who'd a thunk it wouldn't be a hit. I think it's pretty apparent they wanted this to be the coup de grâce for a celeb who dared to suggest on national TV that 9/11 was an inside job.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Dec 4, 2008 19:06:13 GMT -5
Overheard some young people lamenting the fact that Rosie had "gone crazy" and "writing crazy blogs" and saying that this first happened after first "she came out" publicly as a lesbian , suggesting I suppose that the stress of being an out lesbian in the media had caused too much strees to her and subjected her to unfair attacks. They were sad because they thought that Rosie had lost her credibility and her mind.
The truth is that Rosie, like all other US celebrities, is a CIA puppet and was just used as a sock puppet for certain political purposes now and then by the CIA. There was the time when she was a top speaker and media friend at pro-gun control rallies before the 2000 election, serving to rile up anti-gun control "base" voters of teh GOP and help Bush/Cheney. Then after 9-11 she was quoted widely as praising Bush's leadership and being a convert-to-neocon pro-"war on terror" Republicanism. Then on The View she began saying 9-11-inside job truth opinions, but actually giving only the weakest evidence instead of stronger and direct-proof-of-inside job facts and pictures/videos. Then she "acts crazy" and stupid thereby serving to discredit 9-11 truth people.
She is carefully programmed and scripted to be counter-productive to reality and the left, all the way.
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Dec 4, 2008 20:31:28 GMT -5
"Then on The View she began saying 9-11-inside job truth opinions, but actually giving only the weakest evidence instead of stronger and direct-proof-of-inside job facts and pictures/videos. Then she "acts crazy" and stupid thereby serving to discredit 9-11 truth people." ^ OMG! That ties in w/ what I've been reading in that Laurel Canyon series. According to the author, the anti-war hippies were brought in to take the movement away from the more credible anti-war professors & college students. They were also able to control the movement more by putting their own people in place (such as Jim Morrison & David Crosby). Inside The LC: The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation Part I May 8, 2008 www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr93.html
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Dec 10, 2008 6:55:50 GMT -5
Just before Rosie began speaking out on TV on behalf of the truth about the 9-11 Inside Job, CNN did an interview with Rosie's manager as part of a series about Hollywood public relations. Her manager was shown telling someone "Don't ever say that Bush is immoral."
|
|