|
|
Post by lostworld on Oct 17, 2008 17:54:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Oct 17, 2008 18:05:39 GMT -5
I'm glad you brought this up, lostworld. I've been considering Brooke Shields as a replacement-impostered candidate for more than two years. That last photo looks like it could be a male impersonating her, just as PAULA ABDUL (another candidate) sometimes appear to be a male imposter of the real Paula.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Oct 17, 2008 18:15:52 GMT -5
Okay, lostworld, I copied two of your pics. I hope you don't mind but I thought two pics from a similar angle would be good to compare. Brooke ?  Brooke  |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Oct 17, 2008 18:31:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Oct 17, 2008 19:29:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Oct 17, 2008 19:49:00 GMT -5
I'm glad you brought this up, lostworld. I've been considering Brooke Shields as a replacement-impostered candidate for more than two years. That last photo looks like it could be a male impersonating her, just as PAULA ABDUL (another candidate) sometimes appear to be a male imposter of the real Paula Thanks Beatlies! Interesting how we all seem to be on to the same things...  I saw an interview with Frooke several years ago, I hadn´t seen her for a long time, and reacted immediately to how different she looked. I didn´t know anything then about replacements etc but it all makes sense now... Paula Abdul? Please post some pics if you have. |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Oct 17, 2008 19:58:02 GMT -5
Thanks for the quick feedback The Mask! You were so fast that you beat me to it with the videoclips Now we have the same ones but that´s just  Yes, the voice is different. Like you say, even if she´s so young it shouldn´t differ that much. And of course I don´t mind that you´re "stealing my pics". I will get back with some more comparisons myself too. |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Oct 17, 2008 22:15:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Oct 17, 2008 22:47:40 GMT -5
You can really see the difference in these two pics: |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Oct 18, 2008 6:14:37 GMT -5
My, my... Welcome to DOPPEL HOUSE, BROOKE! 100% replaced. There were at least 2 FROOKES, as far as I can see. Her replacements are a mix of PAULINA PORIZKOVA, RENEE SIMONSEN and KATARINA WITT, also likely that a man/tranny slipped in her "skin". The male features are at some points obvious as hell.
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Oct 18, 2008 6:27:17 GMT -5
My, my... Welcome to DOPPEL HOUSE, BROOKE! 100% replaced. There were at least 2 FROOKES, as far as I can see. Her replacements are a mix of PAULINA PORIZKOVA, RENEE SIMONSEN and KATARINA WITT, also likely that a man/tranny slipped in her "skin". The male features are at some points obvious as hell. Thanks for your comments Artemis! The shape of the face, jawline, chin, nose, eyes, even the mouth/smile - all different. Conclusion: replaced. Yes, in some pics she looks like a man. "The most beautiful girl in the world" replaced by a man/tranny - it´s just so sad and tragic. |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Oct 18, 2008 6:35:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Oct 18, 2008 15:07:51 GMT -5
My, my... Welcome to DOPPEL HOUSE, BROOKE! 100% replaced. There were at least 2 FROOKES, as far as I can see. Her replacements are a mix of PAULINA PORIZKOVA, RENEE SIMONSEN and KATARINA WITT, also likely that a man/tranny slipped in her "skin". The male features are at some points obvious as hell. Looking at the feminine softness in the young and true Brooke, and seeing the squareness of the jaw, in fact, some of those look like a female impersonator. Has me thinking if the replacements were Eastern European women, who have a tendency to have "big eyebrows" and features that could be similiar to that of the real Brooke. But I've been wondering about this. Why would someone so beautiful need to have a "nosejob" as the character obviously has a different nose? The nose and eyes are the first things I seem to notice as being different, then the jawline and facial shapes. Also, the real Brooke has a slight cleft in her chin, whereas "Frooke" does not. You don't lose that with age. Also the cheeks look "fake" as if the replacement has had cheek implants. Why the heck would the real Brooke Shields need cheek implants and have her chin changed??? I'm thinking the first Brooke was a "model" with a squarer face and then the Frooke we see today, is the female impersonator. |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Oct 18, 2008 15:09:54 GMT -5
You can really see the difference in these two pics: IMO, after observing pictures of all three, the woman on the left Frooke #1, and left, Polythene Frooke! |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Oct 18, 2008 16:24:58 GMT -5
But I've been wondering about this. Why would someone so beautiful need to have a "nosejob" as the character obviously has a different nose? The nose and eyes are the first things I seem to notice as being different, then the jawline and facial shapes. Also, the real Brooke has a slight cleft in her chin, whereas "Frooke" does not. You don't lose that with age. Also the cheeks look "fake" as if the replacement has had cheek implants. Why the heck would the real Brooke Shields need cheek implants and have her chin changed??? Thanks Lucy for your input  . That was also my main question before digging into this little project. Why would someone so beautiful change her already perfect nose and face? She could have filled out the cleft in her chin and had had both chin & cheek implants but once again - why???  It doesn´t make any sense... There is absolutely no need to change perfection. And the real Brooke didn´t. Sadly she was replaced. The real Brooke Shields |
|
.
It doesn´t make any sense...