|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 28, 2008 13:27:07 GMT -5
No, you may very well be right. Sometimes the most evil ones are the ones you least expect... However, I know too little. If you have any more info on "evil-Tom" I would appreciate it. Or some link maybe? Cause now I'm curious...  |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Nov 28, 2008 14:30:34 GMT -5
Sometimes the most evil ones are the ones you least expect... Bingo. True for all of us but you know a lot more than most. It's just totally subjective. As a sort of hobby I make a study of the underlying messages in movies and TV shows and I can't help coming away with certain "gut" feelings about certain major figures in the industry. For example, the public thinks that Disney is the epitome of wholesomeness, but the reality is the exact opposite. Evil people like to masquerade as saints and Disney is far from being the only one that pulls this trick on people. If you look at the major players in the industry and pick out the ones who seem the most innocent and wholesome, especially the ones who receive all the kudos and awards and such, you'll be getting a look at what I'm talking about. In reality, those are the worst of the lot.  |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 28, 2008 17:08:12 GMT -5
True for all of us but you know a lot more than most. Thank you Sherlok !  And likewise. For example, the public thinks that Disney is the epitome of
wholesomeness, but the reality is the exact opposite. Evil people
like to masquerade as saints and Disney is far from being the only
one that pulls this trick on people.I've read a lot about Disney, their subliminal messages and their big part in mind control. Really scary stuff. If all those people who thinks that Disney movies are so cute only knew... There is abs no reason to have subliminal messages in any movie, especially not in movies for children UNLESS you have some twisted agenda behind it - as it also turns out to be... Disney defenders says for instance that the word "sex", that is seen in the sky in the Lion King, is placed there just cause the animators wanted to have some fun. Or it was "just a mistake".  I guess they also wanted to "have some fun" when they placed a phallus in the Little Mermaid's castle (that is the only tower in the castle with that shape) etc etc. This is another explanation for it: It is widely believed that the tradition was started by disgruntled animators who were unhappy about the fact that Walt Disney did not include their names in the credits of his early movie shorts. In a sort of underground fight back, the animators started hiding messages in the movies.(from hubpages.com/hub/disney-subliminal-messages)And maybe this was the case in the early days but hardly now. If Disney was the genuine family friendly company as they portray themselves to be they would NEVER allow "mistakes" or "inhouse pranks" like these... It's all there on purpose.     It's just totally subjective. As a sort of hobby I make a study of the underlying messages in movies and TV shows and I can't help coming away with certain "gut" feelings about certain major figures in the industry.If you look at the major players in the industry and pick out the ones who seem the most innocent and wholesome, especially the ones who receive all the kudos and awards and such, you'll be getting a look at what I'm talking about. In reality, those are the worst of the lot. Yeah, I understand what you mean. And that feeling is always (at least in 99,99%) right... That's the scary part. I get the same feeling also when something bad is going to happen. I think this also has to do with that we are more "sensitive" to their evil vibrations or something like that, we just pick up on these things. Somehow, for me, it's easier to spot evil IRL. But of course I can have a bad feeling about actors, royals and politicians too. And, as we've talked about sometimes before here, I think good and evil recognize eachother. That's why some people try to go against you in any way they can. I am the opposite - I leave people alone (avoid evil) until they start to mess with me. But then when I fight back - then of course it's all turned on me so I am the villain... Always the black sheep . But seriously - one of the trademarks for evil is how the person always turn things around and twist everything. Often with the purpose that you should look like the bad guy and he/she completly innocent. This has happened to me several times. And it's easy to fall for that same stupid trick, since they do everything they can to push your buttons and once you've had enough and start talking back (or more like shouting back if you have a temper like me ) then you are the one who looks like the trouble maker, cause then they play the martyre-card. You make THEM feel bad etc. Oh, the sick irony...
|
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 28, 2008 17:28:06 GMT -5
Tom Hanks (a very evil man in IMO) wrote and directed a movie
called That Thing You Do! that offered an explanation for the
"one Hit wonder" phenomenon which, of course, gave a wrong
reason for it.
My personal feeling is that Tom Hanks is ok. He's just controlled by dark/evil forces in the entertainment industry.
Also, movies about famous recording artists are made to cover
up what was really going on in their lives and to give false
explanations for their behavior, etc.
Sure. I saw a quote where George Harrison said 98% of what people thought about the Beatles wasn't true. Can you even assume the real George said that? But yeah, the media blamed Britney Spears' bizarre behavior on the pressures of fame & fortune (or so I gathered). They're not going to say she's a mind-controlled celebrity who started to break free of her programming & freaked, now are they? :-P
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 28, 2008 17:59:34 GMT -5
Don't know if you read my previous answer Faulcon: It's so hard to think of Tom Hanks as evil, so hard to "feel that" (and I "always" recognize evil ).
Think I know too little about him IRL to say anything about him. His success makes him a part of the agenda though, then if he's aware or a puppet I don't know. At the same time, often the worst are the once who portrays themselves as innocent (wolves in sheep's clothing). Oh, this is so hard. I've always liked Tom Hanks... I don't know what to think   |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Nov 28, 2008 21:47:57 GMT -5
I liked Tom Hanks too. I loved him in Forrest Gump & Cast Away & Private Ryan and many other pictures. And, he's far from being the only artist I once liked and now see in a darker light I think the hardest part of unraveling all this entertainment media skullduggery is the affection and admiration we feel for some of these people. My view of Hanks is only my opinion. Your mileage may vary. |
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Dec 6, 2008 3:51:25 GMT -5
Kind of a dark song about Northern Songs, the company that published the Beatles' songs (info at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Songs). This song may also have some PID refs. Beatles - Only a Northern Song www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjAVqK2nqmIIf you're listening to this song You may think the chords are going wrong But they're not; He just wrote it like that. I t doesn't really matter what chords I play
What words I say or time of day it isAs it's only a Northern song It doesn't really matter what clothes I wear
Or how I fare or if my hair is brownWhen it's only a Northern song. When you're listening late at night You may think the band are not quite right
But they are, they just play it like thatIt doesn't really matter what chords I play What words I say or time of day it is As it's only a Northern song. It doesn't really matter what clothes I wear Or how I fare or if my hair is brown When it's only a Northern song. If you think the harmony
Is a little dark and out of key
You're correct, there's nobody there.It doesn't really matter what chords I play What words I say or time of day it is And I told you there's no one there. |
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Dec 6, 2008 4:16:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Dec 6, 2008 7:44:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Dec 6, 2008 8:16:44 GMT -5
Then since the topic of Disney was brought up - I think the Blue Meanies in Yellow Submarine are a ref to the Illuminati. And Walt Disney was Illuminati, right? Don't the Blue Meanies kinda look like Mickey Mouse? LOL! Yes they do... And Walt Disney was very illuminati and the company is still very much with the agenda. www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/the_disney_bloodlinept1.htm |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Dec 6, 2008 8:20:07 GMT -5
I know... It's so much harder to judge them since "the official version" of them is all you have to go on. IRL you can much more easily see through people I think, even if they act "nice". Very interesting article about Tom's dirty divorce, thanks! |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 6, 2008 13:30:31 GMT -5
There is the "public" side of those that we see as part of their "PR". IN other words, their "publicists" and others that are part of a celebrity "image" factory produce that, an image.
We only see the side they want us to see, which is as fabricated as the parts they play in a film. This is the image they show during interviews, official public appearances such as red carpets, press conferences, etc.
Then the created hoopla of paparazzi. Now I'm still uncertain what this is, if these are real people who show the side of celebrity that those celebs do not want us to see. Or just another illusion of stardom. The hounding of the photographers for those "candid" shots, part of the hype into the celebrity life to keep people interested by showing these supposedly "candid" shots.
Regardless, we see what they want us to see. Sometimes we get this schizo image of a star, one minute a trainwreck, Like Brittney Spears of about a year ago, with all of the strange images of being head shaved, wearing strange wigs, unflattering candid shots of her being transported to a psychiatric treatment facility and now she's back with a video a supposedly "hit" CD and back on top? Possibly Spears' is the classic case of trying to escape the celebrity and was depicted as a mental case and now she's complying and "back on track"?
Certainly all of this is just a bunch of hype. Overpublicized and not the greatest singer there is. Her vocals covered up by electronic equipment. I despise this over worked vocals or techno sounds. Bleccch!
I see another up and coming trainwreck awaiting to crash at some point in the future is Miley Cyrus, another overexposed and overhyped icon. The mentality is if people keep saying how funny and talented she is, then people will believe it.
With regards to actors like Tom Hanks, Nicolas Cage and George Clooney, Tom Cruise...I call these Actors of the Illuminati. I could name more. But I see these actors in films that have illuminati fingerprints all over them, such as Davinci Code, National Treasure, etc. etc. These actors are featured in films that have been so entrenched with illuminati hidden messages that it's not even funny.
I believe they are part of the mind conditioning of the masses. IF these actors speak, their audiences will listen. You get different type of actors making different types of films to reach different audiences with the same impact. Conditioning minds for the New World Order....
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Dec 6, 2008 13:53:24 GMT -5
Well said, Lucy. I guess the more likable impression the stars make on us, the more we listen without feeling the need to be critical, which of course is very dangerous. The innocent act is part of the deception and part of the NWO agenda... However, many of these - if not all - stars are in deep mindcontrol and just acting as puppets for the NWO. If they - at one time - went into the deal with their eyes wide open or if they themselves were decieved/forced all along I don't yet know. |
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Dec 6, 2008 15:57:59 GMT -5
I don't know about Tom Hanks. He did Da Vinci Code, which sheds a little light on the Vatican - perhaps at the pinnacle of the Illuminati pyramid.
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Dec 6, 2008 17:55:40 GMT -5
I'm just watching the Britney documentary "For the record": Reporter: "would you say your life is out of control" Britney: " I would say it's too much in control"  When shopping in New York they are chased by so many paparazzis that they want to hire a double. But "it's hard to get one this time of the day".  She also talks about "see the cruel parts to be able to see heaven". That she wouldn't have had one without the other... Lots of other hints and clues of mindcontrol and programming. Madonna is also in the documentary (surprise, surprise ) looking more strange than ever - I actually thinks she really starts to look like a cat.  Britney is def stuck and can't get out even if she wants to. So sad and tragic. |
|
