|
Post by artemis on Nov 4, 2008 11:21:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 7, 2008 10:31:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Nov 7, 2008 17:07:40 GMT -5
I see above one Angelina and Two different Fangelinas. "Angelina" has become a shell game: a mere role identity to be filled by a revolver crew of imposters.
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 7, 2008 18:50:33 GMT -5
"Angelina" has become a shell game: a mere role identity to be filled by a revolver crew of imposters." That's what I'm thinking - that the celebrity name is a brand name on a product. The real Angelina looked very distinctive. The other 2 are kind of bland.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 10, 2008 5:52:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 10, 2008 22:56:02 GMT -5
^ Who the hell is that? Angelina (for reference):
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Nov 15, 2008 16:26:54 GMT -5
^ Who the hell is that? Angelina (for reference): False, misleading "before and after" video. Contrary to the captions, "Angelina"'s nose actually got BIGGER as the years (imposters) went on! The earliest (real) Angelina had the smallest nose, and subsequent Fangelinas had bigger noses. www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2ZOxvbt978Something else: this "16year old ANgelina: video just appeared for the first time THIS YEAR: but is it real or a fake to justify the stark change in the face between 1995 Hackers/ Cyborg 2 Angelina and the recent Fangelinas?? www.youtube.com/watch?v=xa6CjYKG2rA&feature=related
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 18, 2008 6:05:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 23, 2008 9:10:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 23, 2008 12:10:59 GMT -5
Could very well be.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 26, 2008 6:07:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jan 9, 2009 6:21:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jan 9, 2009 11:20:06 GMT -5
I find the real Angelina much more attractive than the fake one.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jan 9, 2009 12:02:05 GMT -5
I never liked ANGELINA as well, but compared to her imposters, shes definitely above them all. The eternal law in doppelgangers field. The ORIGINAL always better/best than the REPLACEMENT.
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Jan 16, 2009 19:58:22 GMT -5
Strange scars on Fangelinafrom awfulplasticsurgery.com: Why are there scars behind Angeline Jolie’s ears? They are somewhat faint, but still visible to the naked eye. When people get face lifts, incisions are made between two and four inches above the ear and then around the front of the ear, around the earlobe into the crease behind the ear, and into or along the hairline behind the ear. Angelina is only 33. Would she really need a facelift? The scars are very surprising to me.
(An alert reader just notified me that surgery that pulls back overly prominent ears can leave scars like that. Hmmm, interesting.)Well, well - did Fangelina fix her ears to look more like Angelinas? Or is there more to it?
|
|