|
|
Post by artemis on Dec 20, 2008 10:50:12 GMT -5
Back when "TOM" and "NICOLE" divorced, some source quoted her as saying, regarding the reason of their split - a possible pregnancy of "Nicole" caused by smb else than her "husband" who reprimanded her: "He knows very well whose child I bear and I can prove it"... But its common knowledge that FOM is sterile and its also common knowledge at Hollywood that he's gay acting like perfect straight man for a lifetime. I wonder how long will it take to hypocrite RICKY MARTIN to come out, lol...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jan 18, 2009 22:12:41 GMT -5
Some more comparisons of fake Tom Cruise and the real Tom Cruise: Cruise  Fruise  The obvious difference is the jawline. Fruise has a much more squared jaw line. Also, it looks like Cruise has his ears set higher on his head. |
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Jan 19, 2009 2:36:31 GMT -5
Looks like Cruise also had bigger eyes. But yeah, the jaw & the chin are totally difft.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 19, 2009 13:45:31 GMT -5
Some more comparisons of fake Tom Cruise and the real Tom Cruise: Cruise Fruise The obvious difference is the jawline. Fruise has a much more squared jaw line. Also, it looks like Cruise has his ears set higher on his head. This is an excellent comparison, a real smoking gun. As with the Travolta/Fravolta comparison and Mia Farrow/Fia Phauxrrow, profiles are key in imposter recognition. |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jan 20, 2009 17:54:16 GMT -5
You're right beatlies, that comparison was a real smoking gun. Here's an even better example: Cruise  Fruise  |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Jan 20, 2009 18:09:25 GMT -5
The noses are different too.
Fruise nose is a bit higher just at the lower part of the bridge, at the tip.
Cruise's is more even and high all over, with a higher/crocked point further up his nose bridge.
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Jan 21, 2009 8:22:14 GMT -5
Two weeks ago Tom Cruise attended the Golde Globe Awards and there was just something "different" about him. He was much more skinny than usual, and I just got that feeling again that something's "off". I can't put my finger on what it it is but it IS something that's not quite right... And it's not just weightloss, it's something else... He looks younger somehow. I think this Tom Cruise might be a clone...     Yes, rapidly-aged clones are possible, and makes the switch quite easy... from here: It is another matter entirely when a swiftly produced adult clone is the object. A major reason aging can be accelerated is the brain's capa-bility to absorb information and perform functions at a far faster and more comprehensive rate than most Earth people realize. In fact, if this were not so, human cloning there would not be possible. In a rapidly-aged clone, keeping the integrity of all knowledge gained during the original being's lifetime to that point is at stake. The adult clone's initial memory ability is compromised to the extent that the clone may appear befuddled or momentarily at a loss for words until the memory kicks in or the clone's own thinking aspect overrides the hesitation and covers, so to speak. Since this is not highly unusual in "real" people, it is not generally noticed with suspicion in the cloned beings, but rather is considered only a human imperfection. The downloading of all information in the brain of the original person or of the clone being replaced must be done at the moment of the need for the new clone. This can be done most successfully from the person's brain to the first clone. Slight deterioration occurs with every successive downloading procedure from the outcast clone to its replacement. No, the original brain cannot be used to circumvent this deterioration-even if that individual is still alive-because that original brain does not have the same accumulated knowledge as the most recent cloned entity. You can see that the identical store of latest infor-mation is essential if the replacement clone is to be accepted as the real person. The most obvious clue to replication is that the "new" entity will always be fresh and more youthful than that which you will have seen just prior to replacement. This is why you must have control of all your media in order to pull off the subterfuge. Even under strict control of photography and make-up technicians the replication will often differ usually in reversal of character habits or muscle actions i.e., there will be a reversal of a "lop-sided" smile thusly, "talking out of the other side of the face", so to speak. The reversal of these traits is all but impossible to eliminate. So, too, are features which do not respond to stress changes as will a "haggard" or fatigued face pattern. Therefore, the structure and location of the ears, nose foundation and eye socket location must be perfected from viewing to viewing through cosmetic illusion and can never be EXACTLY duplicated. The whole ability to fool the public is the absolutely accepted "absurdity" of such a possibility of scientific achievement and your lack of attention.
You can notice the abrupt and considerable change in appearance toward vibrant health and youthfulness of some world leaders as seen in TV films or photographs. Usually this high robustness and stamina immediately follows a day or a few days of absence from the public eye after a period of increasingly evident aging appearance. You attribute those remarkable differences to the person's brief vacation or recovery from a proclaimed illness, but here it is known that, simply, a new clone has replaced the old one.Jan 2009_______________________________________________ Febr 2008   Jan 2009___________________________________________________ Jan 2008   The cloned adult bodies disintegrate far more rapidly than same-age bodies having grown old naturally. This is due partly to the accelerated aging process from infant to adult body and partly to the lack of skill in those scientists who perform the various procedures. Earth's third density atmosphere also is a factor. These "genetic/holographic" DNA/RNA replicas have been in the perfecting for well over four decades. All that is required is a holographic fragment (literally, one cell) and a replica can be reproduced. Then all that is required is down-loading of the memory data and programming of the manufactured entity. There are technical advances, already in use by the Elite, which would boggle your senses—robotoids are simplistic in relative comparison. They are comprised totally of physical “matter” manifested into what you perceive as physical coalition of these physical matter particles coalesced according to the DNA/RNA holographic blueprint whereby the re-creation will be a projection of that which is being copied at the time of replication. (from fourwinds10.com) |
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 21, 2009 19:05:21 GMT -5
Three known Hollywood celebrity "hot couples" where both are imposters. One terrifying question is: what happens to the children of these couple units? The "adopted" (basically kidnapped) children?
CIA-scripted and "run"-Dual Imposter married (or virtually-married) couples:
Fraunk Finatra and Fia Fauxrrow
Frad Fitt and Fangelina Folie
Fom Fruise and Ficole Fidman
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 6, 2009 5:24:18 GMT -5
A freshly modified FICOLE looking terribly:  |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 15, 2009 15:50:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 22, 2009 14:50:30 GMT -5
Hey, I didn't know Maria Shriver replaced Fom Cruise? He's got her jawline....
Well I'll be dipped in silicone!
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Aug 15, 2009 19:32:20 GMT -5
www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1205746/Connor-Cruise-follow-dad-Toms-film-star-footsteps-remake-Red-Dawn.html#ixzz0OIk0CxKKTom Cruise's son steps into the limelight to take starring role in Hollywood remake of Red DawnBy Daily Mail Reporter Last updated at 1:37 AM on 12th August 2009 Comments (34) Add to My Stories It's a film that put Patrick Swayze firmly on the Hollywood map. Now Tom Cruise's adopted son Connor is hoping a starring role in a remake of the 1984 movie Red Dawn, will do the same for him. The fourteen-year-old's being touted to play the youngest member of a gang in the brutal guerilla warfare flick, which was once named the most violent film by Guinness Book of Records. The original movie features the fictional onset of World War 3 after America is invaded by the Soviet Union and its Central American allies. This latest version follows the gang of youngsters as they take on Russian and Chinese troops.Home and Away star Chris Hemsworth is expected to play Swayze's part of group leader Jed Eckert [a german name, take note, with all its fascistic pro-Nazi, pro-Axis, anti-"Russians and Chinese" Hollywood psy-ops connotations] while Transformers 2 actress Isabel Lucas will take on the role of a cheerleader rescued from an internment camp.The original 1984 cast of Red Dawn including Patrick Swayze and Charlie Sheen. The Guinness Book of Records listed it as the world's most violent film 'Those paparazzi shots of Suri are incredible,' admits Tom Cruise Cruise, the daddy... Tom takes a walk with his two leading ladies Cruising to stardom? Connor pictured with his sister Isabella at Tom and Katie's wedding in November 2006 The cast is reportedly leaving for military training at an undisclosed location in a few weeks' time. [?! "military training" by who? Is the Pentagon and/or CIA/NSA openly producing this Nazi-like Propaganda Film, as another psy-war operation agains the U.S. and world public?] Filming is due to get underway in Detroit next month and is expected to hit cinemas in September 2010. It's by no means an acting first for Cruise Junior, who made his big screen debut last year in the Will Smith drama Seven Pounds. Despite being the son of Hollywood royalty, Tom insists he and ex-wife Nicole Kidman have never pushed Connor into the world of showbiz. In fact, ever since Connor's adoption along with sister Isabella back in 1995, Tom says they've been very careful to provide the right sort of guidance. He and then wife Kidman raised them largely out of the limelight during their eleven year marriage. And they continue to remain close to them following their separation in 2001. In a recent interview, Tom, 46, says he would never put pressure on Connor. He says, 'Who knows what he's going to do? 'But driving him to the audition for his first film role was a great father-son moment Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1205746/Connor-Cruise-follow-dad-Toms-film-star-footsteps-remake-Red-Dawn.html#ixzz0OIk0CxKK
|
|
|
|
Post by lea214 on Aug 20, 2009 4:11:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Aug 21, 2009 13:30:38 GMT -5
That was a wax figure  ....or was it?  |
|
|
|
Post by lea214 on Aug 26, 2009 5:34:44 GMT -5
Ah, you could be right there. It was posted on the blogs as a pic of NK but it looks like it could be a wax dummy, doesn't it?  |
|
