|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 19, 2008 18:03:51 GMT -5
Nicole Kidman and Plastic SurgeryThere's a lot of buzz around the internet when Nicole Kidman appears on TV or some Awards function. The reason? Plastic Surgery and Kidman have a strong bond between each other. Some of the things Nicole loves dowing are rhinoplasty, brow lift, cheek implants, lip collagen, and lots of botox. People don't find Nicole unattractive; rather they are simply baffled by how different she looks now compared to when she started. Aging is allowable, but looking like a different person is odd. from this site: plasticsurgeryphotos.blogspot.com/2007/08/nicole-kidman-and-plastic-surgery.html
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 20, 2008 14:11:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Nov 20, 2008 22:53:20 GMT -5
Great comparisons lostworld.
From imdb.com:
....Despite her steady employment, critics and moviegoers still hadn't quite warmed to Kidman as a leading lady. She tried to spice up her image by seducing Val Kilmer in Batman Forever (1995), but achieved her real breakthrough with Gus Van Sant's To Die For (1995). As a fame-crazed housewife determined to eliminate any obstacle in her path, Kidman proved that she had an impressive range and deadly comic timing. She took home a Golden Globe and several critics' awards for the performance.In 1996, Kidman stepped into a corset to work with her countrywoman and onetime admirer, Jane Campion, on the adaptation of Henry James's The Portrait of a Lady (1996). A few months later, she tore across the screen as a nuclear weapons expert in The Peacemaker (1997), adding "action star" to her professional repertoire.....
Could this have been when she was replaced?(noting the statements in bold)
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Nov 20, 2008 23:03:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 21, 2008 1:44:19 GMT -5
Thank you, the Mask! Comment on you tube from that first clip: oh my god!!!is that really nicole kidman??
...she looks a little ugly... patatakaintomata (1 month ago) I think you´re really on to something regarding when she was replaced... You can clearly see her "new look" in that second clip from 1995. After that her career took off. The real Nicole Kidman had a very natural look that is rare in Hollywood. No wonder she wasn´t accepted.  Could very much be the reason why she had to be replaced... |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Nov 21, 2008 21:47:21 GMT -5
This is supposed to be Nicole taken Oct 2008:  I got it from here. And, this is supposed to be a recent pic of Cruise:  I got it here. Uh, do these people even resemble Kidman and Cruise? |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 22, 2008 13:06:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Nov 22, 2008 14:12:10 GMT -5
Beatlies! On demand  I don´t know what to think...  Well what I've noticed is that the fake Kidman has a slightly shorter nose, among other things. |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 23, 2008 18:20:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Nov 24, 2008 14:51:25 GMT -5
^ Thank you, lostworld. I've never seen that version of the movie. I had the impression it was more of a comedy? Like maybe an attempt to debunk the idea? Just a guess. Anyway, I saw the original movie again recently. It moves slowly by today's standards but I think it's still a must-see for those interested in this subject.  |
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 24, 2008 15:35:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 24, 2008 15:59:13 GMT -5
^ Thank you, lostworld. I've never seen that version of the movie. I had the impression it was more of a comedy? Like maybe an attempt to debunk the idea? Just a guess. Anyway, I saw the original movie again recently. It moves slowly by today's standards but I think it's still a must-see for those interested in this subject. Yes, it is a comedy. Or more like a satire/comedy. The original is more like a thriller, right? Long time since I saw it... That trailer for you was more like "the exclusive macho-version". An official version though. But this is the main official trailer that reflects the movie more: www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3HASgMS7w0&feature=relatedand just for fun: www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nWkVJCbL54&feature=related |
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Nov 24, 2008 17:03:33 GMT -5
Amazing pics of N. K. Now, the question is: clone or look-a-like? But seriously, the nose is really quite difft. It also seems like N. K.'s front teeth are bigger.
|
|
|
|
Post by lostworld on Nov 24, 2008 18:55:53 GMT -5
Amazing pics of N. K. Now, the question is: clone or look-a-like? But seriously, the nose is really quite difft. It also seems like N. K.'s front teeth are bigger. Yeah, I found the right ones. Took some time though... The nose on the clone/double/who knows what - is a bit longer at the tip. I mean the tip of the nose stands out a bit longer from the face, it´s somewhat extended and more marked. Not noticeable on all pics though. Hmm.... Ficole´s nostrils are bigger and especially the lower part of her face is different in shape and also wider than Nicoles. The fronth teeth are different. And more white. I also think that the eyecolour might be different. Maybe. The real Nicole seems to have more green eyes (very common with readheads) and Ficole more bluish. However, it can be different lights etc that can create this illusion too. |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Nov 26, 2008 0:40:59 GMT -5
Just looks like totally different chicks to me. |
|
