|
|
Post by emerald on Aug 22, 2022 2:30:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Sept 27, 2022 8:50:26 GMT -5
I just received this email - he makes some good points: You have to look into evidence of George and Ringo being replaced, also. I noticed for a very long time how post 1966/1967 "the Indian spirituality suddenly turned metaphysical George" had a very different, "airy", weak, soft, imperceptible voice, which contrasted with young Harrison's cheeky, very powerful and confident vocals, as in the "A Hard Day's Night" album. As you poi ted out, vocal characteristics are basically physiological in nature, personally unique, as a "material constant" linked to pulmonary or breathing factors - these vocal fingerprints that could not have been possibly be altered so dramatically in 2-3 years. Harrison lost his force and confidence in singing and the expiratory air flow! Was he not anymore the balsy, cheeky, in your face Beatle?... Young Harrison had the vocal "ejection power" of a locomotive signal; post 1967 his voice was lacking texture, it was shot, so weak to becoming difficult to hear. As in Long, long, long... , Something or Here's come the Sun. Cannot blame all this rapid vocal deterioration on smoking ?... He was still so young. Folks on audiophile forums picked this up, but nobody seems to have had a clue : forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/the-voice-of-george-harrison-early-mid-60s-vs-70s-80s.829767/Ringo's face and cranium shape seemed to have changed over the years. The guy that appeared in 1967 in the Sgt Pepper photos was such a lame immitation. Ringo of 1966 looked very manly and mature, the replacement was quite wimpy. Why the new cool Ringo always wears sunglasses, even indoors?... Not many PID investigators have pounced on or teared down yet the artificial- intelligence software- generated - faces of the "four fabs" in Peter Jackson's studio virtual recreation of the "Get back" tapes. Why ? There is so much material there. if we Forget about Paul vs Faul for a sec...; It jumped out at me : Stunning contrast between the "John Lennon" that plays on the roof (allegedly) on Jan. 30, 1969 , who looks suddenly 10 years older, more mature, has a square face, bigger head, his facial shape is different, with a much larger dilated forehead revealed by wind blowing his "hair" in all directions, as in an inverse trapezoidal shape, as also different is the neck width and shape, his hair length and color, his overall cranium shape, hair color (almost red) etc. and the younger looking, mostly not serious, with a softer skin, supple chin and soft - suave faced "Lennon" from the Apple Corps studio, seen downstairs listening to tge recordings, immediately after the rooftop concert, as if he was an animated cartoon character or a double derived from the 1968 White Album cover photo... who came out from the wall and took his place !? Thanks for your work on this topic. Scary but true..., it appears likely that all 4 were "replaced sometime in 1966. |
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Jan 12, 2023 11:09:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Jan 27, 2023 9:04:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Feb 9, 2023 12:57:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Mar 21, 2023 7:40:27 GMT -5
|
|
