|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 14, 2010 12:53:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Apr 14, 2010 14:40:44 GMT -5
Well, according to the forensics experts, it's not the same head shape. Forensic science proves Paul was replacedI think it's a little sad that some people seem to think it's "fun" that someone got replaCIAed. You realize that involved murder, right? |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 14, 2010 19:04:55 GMT -5
So is this a thread to discredit plasticmacca, or are we here to debate if there were more than one Faul?
His face has been bloated with fillers over the years, but it's not the real Paul.
This has been discussed about photo tampering and it shows some strange images, but there was only one replacement.
Paul was killed, thus needing a replacement.
|
|
|
|
Post by treegenus on Oct 21, 2010 16:00:20 GMT -5
alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/2008/01/bilocation-of-hillary-clone-clinton.htmlTHis is from the blog/site that was just posted about Hilary Clinton, if you scroll down. A rehash but worth noting again. But it is not just politicians, military people, finance professionals and religious leaders who have been cloned. Human clones are found in the show business world, too. And they feature prominently in the mainstream media's presentation of celebrity culture. Consider the much-discussed case of the two Paul McCartneys. Four other Paul McCartney photographic comparisons can be viewed here, here, here and here. Look at McCartney's left ear lobe here (in 1964) and here (in 1964), compared with his left ear lobe here (in 1974) and here (in 1974). The murder and cloning of Beatle Paul McCartney by agents acting for the Tavistock Institute (London) in 1966 is a story which has been revisited again recently. It is sometimes referred to as The Two McCartneys Conundrum.
|
|
|
|
Post by nachtlicht on Oct 22, 2010 7:52:58 GMT -5
There's also this eggman from Aleister Crowley favorite Alice Through the Looking-Glass, Humpty Dumpty. (TweedleDumpty?) Is tweedledum really Mr. Dum-pty in tweedeee doppleganger disguise? In the original nursery rhyme Humpty Dumpty is not necessarily an egg; there is speculation it refers to British King Richard III, who was "hump" hunchbacked. Aristocrats Dr. Richard Asher and Jane Asher were descendents of King Richard III. ![]() upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/Humpty_Dumpty_Tenniel.jpg[/img] upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/Humpty_Dumpty_Tenniel.jpgIn this classic Alice(ster) illustration, this eggman has JPM style artificial, arched eyebrows.  [/quote] Artemis was absolutly right, she said I should check out this thread here like she felt that I would get a little enlightenment! See, my english is ok but I still sound not good enough. My english needs to get better, so I downloaded me just minutes ago the german "Alice in Wonderland" e-book and at chapter 5 I saw a, how you call it in english? Caterpillar? Well, in german we call these cute little animals "Raupe": www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/worldonthemove/image/2/622/451/2/images/monarch-caterpillar1.jpgThis one is called the "Monarch Caterpillar". Its very interesting. I don´t speak about it here just for fun. Well, all kind of butterflys start as a caperpillar. Now the ambiguity is highly interesting, when I study the first words of the 5th chapter from the "Alice from Wonderland" book. There is a caterpillar and Alice is asking it who it is. This creature says that it doesn´t know anymore since this morning who or what it is, but it got a few times misinterpreted! So, what kind of people could you misinterpretend? Right, just twins! But this here could represent a twin thats still very new and than this creature says: "Because I´m not myself". Remember the new song from Christina Aguilera - Not Myself Tonight !!! So when I think a bit more with deepness, I remember that caterpillars transform into butterflys who are in our case monarch slaves. So this caterpillar is a human that just got into the monarch programing, but will turn out as a butterfly one day! My logical understanding is very clear today, so I guess you all should understand me. I hope so. We also speak about a transformation into a puppet, when we talk about caterpillars who will make them ready to transform later into a butterfly and a puppet is in our case a doll.  It makes perfectly sense. Chapter 6 you will find the story with a cat and a cat gives her some advice, but what is a cat in our case? Right - a type B Monarch-Slave (Sex Kitten Programing!)  So we have in the "Alice in Wonderland" story all the transformations and types of slaves and victims that we talk about when we study hollywood and stars! I need to study the hole book! |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 7, 2013 17:25:32 GMT -5
I was googling on You Tube and I found a clip called 70IF and it showed footage of an older man who looked like he was Faul at one time. Then I clicked another video that came on the side and it was a former custodian of Paul's home. Someone posted that his name is John Halliday, which I thought was strange, but he does look like an old Faul. The above pic from MMT struck me that this custodian may have been this fool on the hill. As I've watched that video and I've seen a couple of Fauls in that clip. Something I really strange to find this guy show up now, as a "former custodian of Paul's home". Really? |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jan 8, 2013 14:47:59 GMT -5
JOHN HALLIDAY? DOESNT THAT REMIND U OF THE "PAUL" MCCARTNEY - SYLVIE VARTAN - JOHNNY HALLIDAY CONNECTION? WEIRD INDEED.... "FORMER CUSTODIAN OF PAUL" OR "FORMER CUSTODIAN OF PAUL'S HOME" - WHAT MAKES U THINK OF, LUCY? LITERALLY IT MAKES NO SENSE, BUT FIGURATIVELY ITS A REFERENCE TO PAUL'S REPLACEMENT.... THE ONE THAT LIVES IN PAUL'S SHADOW, UNDER HIS SKIN, HIS IDENTITY, WHO "TAKES CARE" THAT HIS "LEGACY" GOES ON, THAT HIS NAME WILL BECOME A TRADEMARK.... JUST MY TWO CENTS
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 8, 2013 19:08:20 GMT -5
Google 70 IF and you can see the old man they claim is Paul...when I say "they" I refer to whoever put the video together.
Custodian of his identity.....not "Bill"
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jan 9, 2013 5:03:35 GMT -5
Not Bill by all means, but any other replacement....
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 9, 2013 12:33:33 GMT -5
This is my take on the entire Faul/Paul scenario.
The "system" wanted to use music as a means to divide the youth from their elders, and Elvis only took it so far. They had to get a "group" to use the masses.
They had their "iconic image" of what they wanted by taking the young Beatles as their "models" and got doubles back in the pre-fame era. I'm thinking they wanted their doubles to be ready for use at a latter time, even if at first to use for decoys.
But looking further into rare footage of old interviews, public appearances as well as in concert, there were doubles used, even in the mop top phase of their operation. You can see in the videos on youtube of doubles being used. The differences in their stance, as well as their facial features and even the singing is different if you really examine it.
As to how many sets of doubles I don't know, but we've seen several Fauls, like Sgt Pepper is Bill, but the Strawberry Fields Faul looks different, as well as "mountain man" and some used during the filming of MMT.
I'm thinking Mr. Janitor was one of them, but certainly not one that was used for long. That's my take.
When they were in Hamburg, and this can include the Ralph Ellis, Denny Laine, and other such musicians being trained and surgically altered to resemble the famous counterparts.
I'm still thinking that Ringo was the first to be replaced as early as 1964. Because of the differences in the facial features of the Ringo in A Hard Day's Night compared to Help!, and afterwards.
This was an elaborate operation. Mind controlling those musicians and doubles as well as the masses into thinking they were all one in the same.
But tell me how can one look years older in just the time they stopped touring at the end of August of 1966, and look so old by the time of recording Sgt Pepper months later? Hmmmm having doubles that were much older than the Fab Four, as we knew them to be.
Really high level work was done to take this operation into being, much less maintaining the myth for all these years.
|
|
|
|
Post by lindsayjudy on Aug 19, 2014 11:51:34 GMT -5
Back in the Fall of 2009, being that I'm a researcher, I went on a personal mission (Internet, not physical) to find out whether there was truth to the rumor that Paul McCartney had died. I spent 14 hours a day for 8 weeks looking at everything online I could find about it. If the real Paul McCartney had died & Faul had not been ready to take his place, there would have been an official death certificate & maybe autopsy photos & by now they would have been posted online. But there's nothing. No police reports. No official newspaper announcement. No funeral. No autopsy report or photos. If Paul or JPM had died, you would have seen a visible emotional reaction from the other Beatles in 1966, but there was none. Paul did the album Revolver, the band took a break & in Autumn 1966 Faul appeared. Then in 1980, at the end of Wings, Faul disappeared except for a few TV appearances with Heather Mills, & Paul #3 appeared. He is taller, different accent, different personality. I might be annoying but it's because I did my research & I'm sure of myself.
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Aug 30, 2014 19:44:02 GMT -5
Back in the Fall of 2009, being that I'm a researcher, I went on a personal mission (Internet, not physical) to find out whether there was truth to the rumor that Paul McCartney had died. I spent 14 hours a day for 8 weeks looking at everything online I could find about it. If the real Paul McCartney had died & Faul had not been ready to take his place, there would have been an official death certificate & maybe autopsy photos & by now they would have been posted online. But there's nothing. No police reports. No official newspaper announcement. No funeral. No autopsy report or photos. If Paul or JPM had died, you would have seen a visible emotional reaction from the other Beatles in 1966, but there was none. Paul did the album Revolver, the band took a break & in Autumn 1966 Faul appeared. Then in 1980, at the end of Wings, Faul disappeared except for a few TV appearances with Heather Mills, & Paul #3 appeared. He is taller, different accent, different personality. I might be annoying but it's because I did my research & I'm sure of myself. Paul's not dead because there's no death certificate? Who let this moron in here? |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Oct 27, 2014 17:39:23 GMT -5
Seriously? No death certificate....that doesn't change the fact Paul's dead....
And another thing, the "entity" known as Paul Mc Cartney did not die. We still have the imposter out there.
|
|
