|
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 15, 2009 12:08:42 GMT -5
How can Paul McCartney and Billy be together in the same photograph (1966-8)?  The answer is simple. Paul was not dead at that time! Paul was sick and tired! Paul wanted to be a paperback writer! Paul asked to be replaced, and the other Beatles agreed! Billy was the choice! Got to get you into my (Paul's) life! www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTUf0EkUhZM |
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Feb 16, 2009 2:09:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 17, 2009 17:34:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Feb 19, 2009 17:43:21 GMT -5
Looks like 3 "Pauls" on that boat.
What is this photo's
place of first appearance?
Who took it?
What was the occasion?
Was there any caption or text accompanying it
when it first appeared?
Has this photo been mentioned before on the internet,
say a few years ago, or not?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Feb 19, 2009 17:49:59 GMT -5
I think that it's two Fauls and a guy that resembles Paul.
|
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Feb 20, 2009 1:30:41 GMT -5
That pic has too many issues w/ it to be legit. Looks like it was photoshopped together to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by scarabbey on Feb 20, 2009 12:39:09 GMT -5
PHOOOOTOOOOOSHOOOOOPP!!!!! It is said that the photo was taken in 1968. I can agree that the man on the left IS Paul McCartney. BUT I can't agree that it this is a legit pic, because: 1. He is wearing the suit which we can see only on 1965 pics. Look at the suit:  It looks more like this one, which was taken in 1965:  For me they are the same. And these two Pauls are from the one time period. 2. There's no Paul McCartney on the other pics from that trip. As the other members have noticed, Paul is standing at the edge of the boat and his hair doesn't appear to be a strand out of place. Like this:  No one's hair appears to be a strand out of place. You can say anything, dark66horse - I don't care. For me Paul IS DEAD. |
|
|
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 20, 2009 14:44:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Feb 20, 2009 15:41:29 GMT -5
PHOOOOTOOOOOSHOOOOOPP!!!!! It is said that the photo was taken in 1968. I can agree that the man on the left IS Paul McCartney. BUT I can't agree that it this is a legit pic, because: 1. He is wearing the suit which we can see only on 1965 pics. Look at the suit: It looks more like this one, which was taken in 1965:  ? On the boat he's wearing a double breasted jacket. In the lower pic he's wearing a single breasted jacket of a different color. How are they the same? He's also wearing a wider tie on the boat as was the style in the late 60s and early 70s but in the lower pic he's wearing a skinny tie as was the style in the early-to-mid 60s. It's not always windy on a boat. If it's a calm day and the boat is not underway or moving slowly, there would be no wind particularly. |
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Feb 20, 2009 23:03:51 GMT -5
Maybe not Photoshop, but they definitely had ways to make photo composites & tamper w/ photos. Just look at the pixelation pattern in the photo where the bridge is. That pattern is not consistent throughout. That is enough to convince me it's been tampered w/ & isn't legit.
Ok, the photo is still good to show that pics have been tampered w/, I suppose, but it does nothing to show that Paul was still around in 1968.
|
|
|
|
Post by scarabbey on Feb 21, 2009 3:06:13 GMT -5
"The Beatles Book Monthly" is well known for it's tampered photos, so it doesn't alter the situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by faulconandsnowjob on Feb 21, 2009 13:08:24 GMT -5
Case on point:  |
|
|
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 21, 2009 16:10:05 GMT -5
quote: "The Beatles Book Monthly" is well known for it's tampered photos I agree with you, but if "The Beatles Book Monthly" intention was to eliminate suspects about Paul's death / replacement and show Beatles fans that everything was normal, that there's only one Paul McCartney from 1942 to now, I wonder for what reason should they have tampered the photo by puttting 2 or 3 Pauls in the same picture with the concrete risk to generate dangerous suspects about paul's death / replacement?  |
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Mar 6, 2009 21:04:31 GMT -5
Where's that Magical Mystery Tour photo of the banquet showing two Fauls in the same room and a JPM-esque "Jenny Crowley" with a false nose? (rummage rummage....)
|
|
|
|
Post by fauxster on Feb 18, 2010 22:02:37 GMT -5
Ok, first of all, there are 2 Fauls in the picture, not one.  I've taken the most obvious problematic sections of the photo & enlarged them. Left - There is a grid-like pixelation pattern throughout most of the background. It's almost like a web on top of the picture. See how it's on the right side of the blow-up, but not on the left side? Middle - Notice how there is no pixelation whatsoever in this section? It's stark white. Absolutely no "netting" pixelation to be seen. Right - I don't know what's up w/ this. Maybe it was the Philadelphia Experiment & this guy's head became one with the post? Because of the inconsistencies in the pixelation pattern, I say that this is a composite of several different images. I also say it fails as "proof" that Paul was still around in 1968. First of all, it's inconclusive as to whether that is actually Paul's picture. Even if it is, it could easily have been pasted in. Other parts of the image have clearly been doctored, so the image is already highly suspect. Maybe the 2 Fauls were pasted in, too. Who knows? |
|
?
