|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 25, 2010 22:18:41 GMT -5
Oh, gosh, Im tired of that... The same thing repeated over and over til saturation... I lost count how many times they said some personalities are related to my voivod, Vlad. How much truth is in all these? Not too much, Id say. But the attention and publicity matters, u see... PATTINSON, the TWILIGHT series, dark hero related to Vlad, another supposedly dark hero. Connect the dots. Bullsh*t! I said it before and I say it again now: the Dracula myth is zero and has nothing to do with Vlad. It was just an idiot's imagination, namely Bram Stoker's. Vlad was a man ahead of his time, a great leader, really charismatic and his gloomy side - excessively sometimes - was more the invention of his enemies. Even nowadays he is underrated and despised by many local idiots who swallow the official historical crap. Its like those white Americans (lets say an example) who, trying to seem more interesting and exotic - add a black person or a Native American one or both - in their family tree. I also mite be related to Vlad (eheee, Im dreaming) and noone would know that  Then I'm curious where Vlad got the "Impaler" part of his name. Was it really Vlad the Tailor perhaps? Or, maybe Vlad the Sailor? Or, maybe it was Vlad the In haler 'cause he like to smoke a little doobie now and then? Just curious. |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 26, 2010 0:49:46 GMT -5
How funny, isnt it? I think u smoked a lil doobie when u posted that. "The Impaler" was indeed his nickname and he deserved it. What Im saying (again)is that his dark fame was xaggerated, I didnt say he didnt do it or that he was innocent. Or probably I should let everybody drag his name in the mud for the sake of conspiracy, he was terrible, bloodline, bla, bla, bla...
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 26, 2010 7:56:18 GMT -5
OK, I understand. Vlad really did impale people but underneath that
misunderstood exterior he really wasn't as bad as people think.
Gotcha.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 26, 2010 8:47:49 GMT -5
U can make fun as much as u want. If I wasnt explicit enuff to u, sorry, that tells smth about ur brain. End of Vlad the Impaler matter. In the end this is all that matters and all that history (that written by "victors") says, that he impaled ppl, isnt it?
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 26, 2010 14:45:10 GMT -5
No, I'm sure you're right. I can see where having bodies on stakes in the
front yard could lead to a bad first impression.
|
|
|
|
Post by treegenus on Jun 27, 2010 8:40:48 GMT -5
At least Vlad was up front <G> and you saw his evil and the messages he sent to his enemies. Now our present governments censor all their rampant killings...no TV media coverage, no magazine/newpaper photos of all the unjustified deaths. I think I'm liking Vlad more and more now <G>...no hidden agenda for him! Have a good Sunday!
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 27, 2010 4:23:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Aug 8, 2010 15:29:38 GMT -5
I know it's been a while since I visited this thread, thought I was getting about Sarah, and then there's stuff about Vlad.
I realize that things can go off topic, so excuse that I don't comment on him.
As for Sarah, it's really odd what the powers is doing with her. First she's married to a "prince", then she's divorced. Then an icon for Weight Watchers, then tv hostess?
What is going on here? It's like they don't want to kill her off like they did Di, no sense to sacrifice someone who isn't the goddess icon that Diana was. She's not as influential to people's minds and image as Di was. They just want to make a laughing stock of this woman until she's not much more than a royal hemmorhoid!
Seriously, what is the purpose of this woman being in the spotlight? She's not a true member of the royal family and not influential as "Queenie" and "Chuckie" are.
In fact, a recent article says that Charles feels he was destined to save the world....
More about that..to come...
But as for "Fergie" who was her pet name until some other celeb took over that image....
This woman is a joke.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Sept 11, 2010 6:45:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Sept 11, 2010 17:59:36 GMT -5
Here's a thought. Sarah (or was it Farah) claimed that she was scheduled to be at the World Trade Center the morning of 9-11 for a meeting. She claims that her limo pulled up to the WTC just after the first plane hit and that she just got back into the limo and ditched the meeting for her own safety. What if that's a cover story? What if the real Sarah was indeed in one of the Twin Towers already and was one of the 3000 plus victims? Maybe that's why Harry left the wreath. Prince Andrew (divorced from Sarah/Farah by that time) was also scheduled to be at the World Trade Center on Sep. 11, 2001 but called it off shortly before. Hmmm............. |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Sept 11, 2010 18:01:29 GMT -5
I suppose "Mummy and bro Chuckie" told Andy "Hey don't be going there, we've planned a demolition on the World Trade Centers, DON'T be there!"
|
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Sept 12, 2010 12:09:28 GMT -5
Maybe Opra is trying to buy services of Andy? |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Sept 13, 2010 18:29:43 GMT -5
Do we really need a fake Duchess in a reality show? I hope she's not sharing the bill with Octomom or the family with 20 kids, or the dwarf dog whisperers.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 27, 2010 7:24:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Feb 4, 2011 5:44:00 GMT -5
|
|
