|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 17, 2010 8:42:13 GMT -5
Exactly so we can have an idea who she was, PAMELA or her imposter? Couldnt be she was replaced before DAVID and what we deal with now is a 2nd replacement? Its all so f**ked up...
|
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Nov 17, 2010 11:56:42 GMT -5
It was when I first saw him speak. Pamela was sitting in the front row and I was sitting in the second row behind her. She had no personality it seemed. She just sat there like a little blonde mouse. I was expecting the girlfriend of Icke to be dynamic, out there, talking to the crowd moving around, organizing things before the lecture. She just sat there like a blank slate. She looked like a real bimbo. One of those corny, new age lalas. Even my friend who was with me was surprised. Icke just seemed way more intelligent and together than she was. I couldn't help thinking it was a Yoko type situation. She was some kind of distraction meant to keep him in line. When was this? Month, year. This was in 2002, Boston |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Nov 27, 2010 15:47:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 27, 2010 16:41:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Nov 27, 2010 20:52:35 GMT -5
Is the man in the third video the same man as the one in the first two videos?
Video 1
Video 2
Vdieo 3
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Nov 28, 2010 6:17:53 GMT -5
No, its not. I now realize how charming and nice the real ICKE was and why Ive always found FICKE kinda weird and repulsive.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Nov 30, 2010 20:45:37 GMT -5
Does anybody else believe these are the same two guys?   They are not. Darn reptilian shapeshifters! |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Nov 30, 2010 20:46:40 GMT -5
Does anybody believe these are the same two guys? (better comp)  |
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Dec 1, 2010 3:18:13 GMT -5
Once again the same answer - NO. Id have liked to see a profile comparison though. If possible. If not, its ok.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Dec 1, 2010 6:24:25 GMT -5
It might be difficult to get a profile.
But one thing that can't change is the size of the iris. Pupils can dilate and get bigger but the iris stays the same size. The real David has larger irises than his replacement.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Dec 1, 2010 6:40:10 GMT -5
True.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Dec 1, 2010 16:45:39 GMT -5
Anybody else wanna comment if these are the same two guys? And if they are different, WHY was the name David Icke created? |
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Dec 1, 2010 20:04:16 GMT -5
The same "two guys"? Do you mean the same guy? Yes, I think they are the same guy. It looks to me that he got older and heavier and his hair went gray. The photo on the right (above) also appears to be a studio portrait for publicity purposes that's been touched up a bit as studio portraits often are. But one thing that can't change is the size of the iris. Pupils can dilate and get bigger but the iris stays the same size. The real David has larger irises than his replacement. The iris can open and close, usually due to ambient light conditions. With less light present it normally opens wider making the pupil appear larger. When light is brighter it closes down more and the pupil appears smaller. |
|
|
|
Post by msmoonlite on Dec 1, 2010 20:06:14 GMT -5
Okay, first off the hair is different, a given. Also the jaw seems wider in the 2nd photo. I do note a difference in the eyes. The eyes in the first Ficke photo seem more rounded almost like a camera lense, too perfectly round.
I've noticed this lense- eye with others that I believe to be replaced. Subtle differences, but they're there.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Dec 1, 2010 22:28:43 GMT -5
The same "two guys"? Do you mean the same guy? Yes. this is not the only pic where early david's irises appear larger mind you. and pupils get larger not irises. |
|
