|
Post by The Mask on Jun 13, 2010 19:59:58 GMT -5
Julia Roberts... Replaced or Not replaced?
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 14, 2010 13:26:22 GMT -5
Not replaced. But this is just my opinion, of course
|
|
|
Post by treegenus on Jun 14, 2010 13:33:02 GMT -5
So, if Julia Roberts wasn't replaced, and everyone thinks George Clooney was replaced, and their supposed to be best friends, (TV interviews and all) then how does that play out? Is she a bit mind controlled and oblivious to that fact?
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jun 16, 2010 13:23:30 GMT -5
When looking at side by side pics, it would be best to find a pic of them either both smiling or not smiling. As one's face looks different when smiling, esp if you have a big mouth. I'm not saying that to be funny, but she does have a broad smile and it makes her eyes look a different way than when not smiling.
But it does look like a different nose...Which I always come to this thought when I look at stars, if you look as beautiful as the woman on the left, why would you get a nose job? Why would you change that? I can see how stars would want to look younger and keep that image going as long as they can, but why would you get a nose job?
I'd like to see more pics of Julia through the years...before I jump on the Julia/Fulia thing.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jun 16, 2010 13:27:18 GMT -5
Rather than modify the above post, I'll just add another one.
When I read the Cathy O Brien book Tranceformation of America, I remember reading that her handlers would not feed her much, if at all, and they kept her active, doing chores, or exercising to stay thin. This is a trend I've seen from actresses, they first come on the scene and they have a nice figure, not "fat" by everyday people standards, but perhaps by Hollywood standards.
If these actresses are slaves, and we believe that many if not all, have been slaves or are slaves, they would be kept stick thin by their handlers.
How many have been displayed on tabloids as being anorexic? How many look sickly thin?
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jun 16, 2010 13:54:32 GMT -5
Rather than modify the above post, I'll just add another one. When I read the Cathy O Brien book Tranceformation of America, I remember reading that her handlers would not feed her much, if at all, and they kept her active, doing chores, or exercising to stay thin. This is a trend I've seen from actresses, they first come on the scene and they have a nice figure, not "fat" by everyday people standards, but perhaps by Hollywood standards. If these actresses are slaves, and we believe that many if not all, have been slaves or are slaves, they would be kept stick thin by their handlers. How many have been displayed on tabloids as being anorexic? How many look sickly thin? Good point, Lucy. I urge people to read this book. It includes exposure of the mind control and secret political use of Hollywood and Nashville entertainment celebrities as well. Some are abused-from-childhood mind control/sex/courier slaves in the mold of Cathy O'Brien (who was married to C-List celebrity ventriloquist and Bob Hope USO tour performer Alex Houston). Among those exposed by O'Brien are the Mandrell Sisters and Loretta Lynn. The Catholic Church education system, and Jesuits, also figure in heavily as CIA/Pentagon colluders in child abuse, mind control programming and drugging. The meager diet and exercising/athletics regimen not only keeps them thin, it makes them more docile and compliant to follow orders, accept verbal and physical abuse, not question the morality of what they are doing or is being done to them, lowers the strength to resist etc. At the same time keeping them "stimulated" and energetic enough to complete their appointed rounds.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jun 16, 2010 13:56:39 GMT -5
Julia Roberts... Replaced or Not replaced? Replaced. I see skull and facial bone structure differences.
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jun 17, 2010 12:53:03 GMT -5
^I agree with beatlies--replaced.
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 17, 2010 13:20:14 GMT -5
Yep.
Fool-Ya Roberts!
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 17, 2010 13:28:01 GMT -5
Likely she was replaced in 2005? Judging by her imdb filmography, u can say that...
|
|
|
Post by guivre on Jun 17, 2010 18:49:05 GMT -5
I dunno, she was married to the big nobody in 2002, after a big string of dating headliners. Maybe some time around then. Or perhaps something more complicated, factoring in her brother, Eric. This from her IMDB bio: Lies on her back to have her make-up applied before going onto a film set -- she insists it gives her a relaxed look.This is her brand new Lancome ad, for comparison
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jun 17, 2010 20:24:20 GMT -5
Likely she was replaced in 2005? Judging by her imdb filmography, u can say that... I'd say before 2005 because it looks like her replacement in Closer(2004):But it looks like the real deal in Notting Hill(1999)
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 17, 2010 22:39:12 GMT -5
Here in Mona Lisa Smile (2003)
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 19, 2010 12:26:34 GMT -5
Or was she replaced after ERIN BROKOVICH, considering the subject of the movie?
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Jun 30, 2010 21:05:56 GMT -5
Okay...Cindy Crawford...Replaced or Not Replaced? Cindy ? ? ? ?
|
|