|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 4:27:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Apr 8, 2011 7:26:19 GMT -5
I think the 1973 pic is of the real Christie.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 7:29:33 GMT -5
 Said that by the time I made the posts on her. That was last year... Yes, I also believe thats the one and only true CHRISTIE BRINKLEY who definitely was prettiest compared to all her replacements. |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Apr 8, 2011 7:52:08 GMT -5
Yes, she had the most natural beauty. But the girl/clone in the 1983 pic is who made the name 'Christie Brinkley' famous.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 8, 2011 9:09:22 GMT -5
Notice the glassy eyed look...from '83 onward.... I recently saw her whilst channel surfing and she was on some program boasting about being onstage in "Chicago"...since when did she become a "song and dance" star?  She should stick to selling cosmetics and exercise equipment on infomercials... what a difference from the true Christy. |
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Apr 8, 2011 11:39:27 GMT -5
Fristy is transforming into Fatie Fouric....
|
|
|
|
Post by goro on Apr 8, 2011 11:44:47 GMT -5
Amazing how NOTHING in the 1983 Christie matches the 1973 version. The original had the full lips (before lip injections were so common), the unique and scattered hairline (which disappears and becomes smoother later) and the pencil thin natural eyebrow (which becomes thicker later.) Not to mention all the other discrepancies.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 15:06:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 8, 2011 15:11:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 9, 2011 6:11:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 10, 2011 5:16:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Apr 10, 2011 13:26:49 GMT -5
Yeah, this show Who Do You Think You Are? is reenforcing the identity of these celebrities in people's minds. Fashley cried and I wonder if that was faking or if clones retain the emotional memories of their host. |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 10, 2011 16:33:31 GMT -5
Interesting that you mention that The Mask...makes you wonder if they can be programmed to cry on cue, even though there may not be an emotional memory from their own experience, or implant a false memory that would trigger tears.
I was looking at Naomi on the View and she was wiping tears with a kleenex in a way that looked more like someone "mechanically" wiping a tear...and not like someone who was really crying because of a painful memory. So it could be that programming emotional responses even though there is no emotional connection to anything.
If they can reproduce humans to look like the real thing, but have the glassy eyed look, they could probably have fake emotions.
It's almost like those bad actors who try to act like they are crying but they aren't....just in the programming...
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Apr 27, 2011 14:33:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 27, 2011 15:13:14 GMT -5
Oh, my... But when was he replaced I wonder? As a young man, he slightly reminds me of Lee Harvey Oswald. Related perhaps?
|
|
Said that by the time I made the posts on her. That was last year... Yes, I also believe thats the one and only true CHRISTIE BRINKLEY who definitely was prettiest compared to all her replacements.
