|
|
Post by bzzerk on Jan 12, 2011 18:23:30 GMT -5
I think you're right in that there is definitely an occult/energy harvesting and/or energy directing thing going on. The part I'm still wondering about is how do they go about finding the unknown person to be the first replacement? Were all of them show biz wannabes, who hit the gauntlet of having to surrender themselves or be replaced or whatever to get to the next level, perhaps not even realizing that they would be totally replaced, or were some of them just names chosen from a high school yearbook without any aspirations to be famous performers? I think both scenarios are plausible. Some replacements may be scouted by CIA agents and then either threatened/blackmailed into the role or perhaps coerced with money/fame. Perhaps They're implanted either wittingly or even unwittingly with a microchip that allows their behavior to be controlled. Of course there are also synthetic, robotoid and clone replacements, who are all programmed to believe they are the original. As you already mentioned I think some celebs steal the identity of a normal person. i.e. A 'donor identity' is chosen by the elite to become a celebrity. A double/replacement is then scouted to assume the identity and become a celebrity. This person must look similar to the donor identity. The person linked to the donor identity is killed off and we're left with the celebrity (although this usually happens before the celebrity actually becomes famous). In doing this, the celebrity has official birth records, medical records, school attendance records, yearbook photos etc. |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 12, 2011 19:25:32 GMT -5
I also think that some of the celebs were either offspring of military officials, or political figures and DNA plays into it. Not ALL, but I think a certain number of the famous people have been children of certain figures. I really notice that with people in the music business.
|
|
|
|
Post by goro on Jan 13, 2011 16:48:09 GMT -5
These are all excellent points. Thank you. And I do see the military industrial lodge complex and the blueblood/Illuminati type family genetic lines playing into this a lot of times. It really doesn't add up, does it, that SO many "stars" come from those genetic lines and/or have parents with ties to the military industrial lodge complex? I mean, the sheer statistical probability of SO many famous people have connections in that world is astounding. And nepotism too coming into play, often with celebs pretending they're a nobody -- like Nicholas Cage and Jason Schwartzman being nephews of director Francis Ford Coppola.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 13, 2011 20:24:48 GMT -5
When I did some research on John Philips of the Mamas and Papas fame, I read that his father was in the military and John attended that school, I believe it's in Virginia, that many people who emerged in the 60's had attended. I do believe Jim Morrison also attended. Though it's been a while since doing that research the name slips my mind. But Morrison's father was an Admiral in the NAVY.
I'm thinking that more mind control occurs in the military realm than most people realize. Though most of the researchers in this forum realize this as common practice.
Very creepy when you think that most of the famous people being drooled over are most likely mind control slaves.
|
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jan 13, 2011 21:24:39 GMT -5
There is a website, called "davesweblog" or something like that (I 1st heard about on "Nothing is Real") that makes FASCINATING reading about Laurel Canyon in L.A. It turns out that just about EVERY rock star of the 60s and 70s lived in Laurel Canyon. The ALL came from rich and/or military or intelligence backgrounds. Many died in suspicous circumstances. Examples being Frank Zappa (dad in the CIA). Hendrix,Joplin lived in Laurel Canyon. Mama Cass and Keith Moon lived there at one time. They BOTH died in the same apartment in London,owned by Nilsson. And so on and so on. Interesting reading!
|
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jan 13, 2011 21:37:32 GMT -5
^ Links to Dave McGowan's articles are here: davesweb.cnchost.com/The Laurel Canyon articles are in the "Inside the LC" section. |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 14, 2011 19:18:57 GMT -5
What's wrong with having Reagan mentioned on this thread? It applies to both the idea that there was a double being used, most likely since the assassination attempt. It may have been at that time there was a switch to an imposter...if indeed there was not one used before.
To really examine Ronald Reagan, one should take a picture from the "film" career, one of Reagan as Governor of Calif., as well as during the campaign in 80, the attempt on his life and even the race in 84.
I think that mind control could have very well been a part in some of the memory issues. Or, it could have been an imposter Reagan that didn't remember the Iran Contra issue, etc.
It would take a bit of work, but worth the effort to see if there was a imposter replacement...esp if Papa Bush was involved and you know he was.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Jan 14, 2011 21:09:31 GMT -5
Yeah, I've been meaning to examine if and when Raygun was replaCIAed. The original 1930s Reagan seems to have actually been a decent guy, politically and morally, ironically enough. He was a progressive and took a brave stand in favor of some Black people being persecuted in some kind of racial discrimination situation; this was in the the 1930s....and he almost joined the Communist Party because of his social justice concerns.... this is just off the top of my head, when I have the time I'll look into the real history and imposter possibilities concerning Reagan.
|
|
|
|
Post by goro on Jan 15, 2011 16:38:22 GMT -5
I want to make a quick note here because I don't have time to show you the pics -- but recently a high school or college photo of the Arizona shooter's father, Loughner, has surfaced - and wouldn't you know the frickin' photo looks EXACTLY like the mug shot of Lee Harvey Oswald/Fee Farvey Foswald. Totally f'ed up. I forget the father's full name. Will try to post it later today or tomorrow if I can.
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jan 15, 2011 16:43:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jan 15, 2011 16:57:10 GMT -5
I want to make a quick note here because I don't have time to show you the pics -- but recently a high school or college photo of the Arizona shooter's father, Loughner, has surfaced - and wouldn't you know the frickin' photo looks EXACTLY like the mug shot of Lee Harvey Oswald/Fee Farvey Foswald. Totally f'ed up. I forget the father's full name. Will try to post it later today or tomorrow if I can.  His name is RANDY LOUGHNER. But Im really skeptical about this pic as showing the real dude. Maybe smb's playing tricks on us. Why a high school pic of the father and not the one of the son (though I saw that too)? Could be a doctored pic of LH OSWALD thrown simply for more distraction. Just my point, feel free to elaborate. The alleged shooter  The same guy (?) in high school  When smiling, the upper lip becomes thinner of course. But in this guy's case its not happening. His upper lip is still thicker in the mug shot compared to that in the high school pic. If the guy in the last pic smiled, his upper lip would almost disappear... Really, is it the same man? |
|
|
|
Post by sabrina on Jan 15, 2011 17:20:21 GMT -5
^ Links to Dave McGowan's articles are here: davesweb.cnchost.com/The Laurel Canyon articles are in the "Inside the LC" section. Check this out. I was listening to this song "Why" by the Byrds. Dave McGowan identifies them as being part of that California pedo/intelligence cult. I've known the song for years and just got what its talking about now! Keep sayin no to her since she was a baby
Keep sayin no to her, not even maybe.
Why
Why
You say there's a limit there
She can't go past that
She don't believe you
She don't think that's where its at...And look at the wiki description of the song: A studio recording of "Why" (along with "Eight Miles High") was originally attempted at RCA Studios in Los Angeles on December 22, 1965 but Columbia Records refused to release these recordings because they had not been made at a Columbia-owned studio.[12][3] Originally, Crosby's lyrics for "Why" were a commentary on his mother's dominance during his adolescence and began with the line "Keep saying no to me since I was a baby."[3] Both Jim Dickson and the engineer at the recording session, Dave Hassinger, expressed concern over the suitability of these lyrics.[3] It was McGuinn who eventually solved the problem by suggesting that the lyrics be altered to "Keep saying no to her", thus making the song a commentary on a girl whose mother restricted her independence.[3] Talking to The Byrds' biographer Johnny Rogan in 1989, Dickson recalled the events surrounding this lyric change: "When I heard the lyric, I thought it was atrocious. One word changed the whole thing and McGuinn thought it up. It was an inspired thought in a crisis."Funny enough I couldn't find it as a youtube clip or even copy the lyrics. I found ONE source with the lyrics and it wouldn't let me copy them. Wonder why?  |
|
|
|
Post by goro on Jan 15, 2011 17:59:48 GMT -5
Hey, thanks Artemis for the photos! I haven't been able to find confirmation that the shooter's dad really IS the guy in that black and white photo, who is a ringer for Fee harvey Oswald in his famous mugshot - but the actual shooter has a lot of shapeshifting going on for sure, not to mention changes in eye color, etc. thanks for the photos!
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jan 16, 2011 21:39:13 GMT -5
The glare in the "alleged shooter's" eyes, the left eye smaller then the wide right eye....mind control. Veins in the temple area as well as peculiar marks on his forehead...possibly where they performed electronic trauma to the brain. They can even drive tiny electronic wiring through the corners of the eyes...I recall that being told by Cathy O Brien....
Very disturbing when looking closely at this picture. The "face of mental illness"....only because it was brought on by mind control trauma.
There were stories floating around that he had researched mind control on his computer...Does this make for an assassin candidate??? If the govt would look at any of our computers and the research that any of us have taken part in, are we all candidates for assassins? Talking about celebrity and political imposter replacements...any of us could qualify as candidates for mental illness patients???
I don't, but do any of you own guns? Just rhetorical question.... But looking into our posts of this forum, we could all be called "mentally disturbed" because we don't think as the sheeple do. For anyone who finds what we discuss here as bizarre or "Fringe" of society....
|
|
|
|
Post by bzzerk on Jan 16, 2011 22:40:21 GMT -5
The glare in the "alleged shooter's" eyes, the left eye smaller then the wide right eye....mind control. Veins in the temple area as well as peculiar marks on his forehead...possibly where they performed electronic trauma to the brain. They can even drive tiny electronic wiring through the corners of the eyes...I recall that being told by Cathy O Brien.... Very disturbing when looking closely at this picture. The "face of mental illness"....only because it was brought on by mind control trauma. There were stories floating around that he had researched mind control on his computer...Does this make for an assassin candidate??? If the govt would look at any of our computers and the research that any of us have taken part in, are we all candidates for assassins? Talking about celebrity and political imposter replacements...any of us could qualify as candidates for mental illness patients??? I don't, but do any of you own guns? Just rhetorical question.... But looking into our posts of this forum, we could all be called "mentally disturbed" because we don't think as the sheeple do. For anyone who finds what we discuss here as bizarre or "Fringe" of society.... Generally speaking, I don't think people who discuss replacements and the goverment's/military's activities on a forum, are considered a threat. If you started touring the country, holding seminars, exposing these things, then you may have cause for concern. I doubt too many people on this forum are going to admit to owning guns either. I'm not sure ordinary people can be successfully mind-controlled either. This may need to be something done from birth in order to create the necessary alters before the mind has had a chance to develop. Or I could be wrong and we may all be on a CIA domestic terrorist list. Does make you wonder why you need to register just to read the forum. |
|
