|
Post by artemis on Jun 5, 2010 7:27:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 14, 2010 14:51:17 GMT -5
"Jennifer Aniston Thinks And Acts Like A Man!
Comic Adam Carolla has his own theory on why Jennifer Aniston is still living the life of a bachelorette. She must be a player! Like a man of course.
Muses Carolla: “I think she probably has a lot of testosterone and probably thinks like a man…There are certain women out there, they say you can tell from the jaw line…they did some study that women who have sharp jaw lines…it’s a masculine feature.” “The point is,” the comic says, “maybe she has a little too much testosterone and maybe she is a female version of one of these guys who bangs his way through Hollywood. Like a female Gerard Butler.”
|
|
|
Post by lindsayjudy on Jul 1, 2010 21:37:39 GMT -5
Skeptical said: "Very odd.
I am beginning to wonder if they "twin" the actors and their replacements and put the original and the "twin" in their films.....you see Jennifer and Fennifer in Leprechaun....something very off here that I can't quite put my finger on.........you see Jennifer in Leprechaun with the distinct fuller, heart shaped face, and you also see the manjaw Jennifer, and I don't think it's different camera shots....."
You're waking up to something I'm noticing too. That a lot of A-list actors and actresses have twins, one a bit fuller in the face and body and the other a thin version. This past winter, watching a Biography on Eddie Murphy's life and career, I noticed they interviewed two different Eddies. On this forum, people have claimed that one was killed by the Illuminati. But I watched AGHAST as they interviewed both Eddies! One is a smaller, funnier version and the other more beefed-up with a serious personality. So YES, they do use them in the same movie, interview, even TV show.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jul 19, 2010 10:16:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 19, 2010 14:15:54 GMT -5
I've noticed that she seems to get younger. And it doesn't seem like a "normal" young look. A number of other celebs in question have that appearance, Fom Fruise is another one.
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Aug 7, 2010 2:30:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Aug 7, 2010 3:19:51 GMT -5
LOL, I saw that. Sorry about the nose, FENNIFER! A few more inches pls?
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Aug 7, 2010 14:05:45 GMT -5
I'm sorry, I never subscribed to the idea that Jennifer/Fennifer was a talented actress and/or comedian. This is part of the Illuminati's mind programming of the masses. You keep hearing from the media that Friends was a great show and that the cast was so talented. Bullhockey...no, we've just been bamboozled with so much crap about these so called stars as being talented that they don't even realize they are being bamboozled.
They buy into the line of crap and they don't even bother to examine it first!
I may be in the minority, but I never watched any of her movies. Don't see what all the commotion is about.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Aug 7, 2010 16:06:20 GMT -5
FRIENDS was one of the countless series completely lacking inspiration to say the least. Just to keep the idiots busy watching it. Ive seen ppl waking up one way or another and realizing there was nothing about this "show". As for any talent of these actors playing in FRIENDS, JENNIFER/FENNIFER wasnt. She was the most talentless of the 3; at the "MEN" chapter, except MATT LEBLANC, the rest of them were a waste of time (I would say PERRY even worse than SCHWIMMER). And perhaps LEBLANC was the most unfairly treated. There must be smth about that, PERRY is zero but still enjoying the cake and so is SCHWIMMER, but its not the case with MATT.
|
|
|
Post by The Mask on Aug 7, 2010 18:30:07 GMT -5
^Yeah the Joey character that LeBlanc portrayed was actually funny.
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Aug 7, 2010 22:01:38 GMT -5
The fake talent thing is very prevalent in Hollywood. Certain individuals are singled out as "the greatest" and there's really nothing special about them but most of the public goes along anyway. And, it's not just actors -- it's also directors, writers, singers, comedians -- you name it. The same goes for shows and movies too.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Aug 8, 2010 15:01:34 GMT -5
I agree with you Sherlok, and that even goes into the Political realm as well. We are fed this line of BS that these politicians are the greatest minds, or great leaders, or great political strategists. It's all about BS-ing the masses into the mindset the system wants from their "people". Dumb them down, and feed them the wisdom they need to hear from freaks like Dr. Phil, the "Doctors" Dr. Oz, even Oprah. These are faces that are used to lure the masses into the mindset they want them to have. Change agents they are. They are fed the material that the public "needs to hear" and drive the point home until the masses accept the crap being flung at them as being talented, smart, pretty, whatever... Fake talent is bad enough from television programs, films, music etc. And it seems like more and more of these talentless icons come out and bombard the airwaves. They come they go. A few years ago Amy Winehouse was the best thing to happen since sliced bread. Now all you hear about is that overrated and overhyped icon called "Lady Gaga"...and I wonder how many of her "doubles" are really "ladies". ? I've wondered if something to this icon has some "transgenders" serving as her doubles? Anyhow, the other crappy dilemma we have to deal with is not only the talentless "actors", but the endless line of so called "reality stars" that bombard the airwaves. People like Kate Gosselin, the one with 8 kids, or Octomom, or any of the "bachelors" or "bachelorettes", those who were fat, who thought they could dance, or sing, or mate with some has-been rock star, or group a set of has been of notoriety of yesterday into some sort of "show" to amuse the flocks. What the hell is "The Hills" and those idiots off that show from Speidy and Lauren Conrad and whatever other bimbos off that crap is called a star??? Or those morons from the Jersey programs? Give me a break? Does the world need a Snookie or Snickerdoodle, or whatever the hell she is? I don't think so! We need to boycott "reality" programs...NO more. I've heard that Ryan O Neal and Tatum want to star in a "reality" show about their drug dazed existence. Follow that up with a dose of Lindsay Lohan and her dad for dysfunctional and idiotic Hollywood parenting... Enough of this crap! Very little do I watch of network television, and really have not much for the other networks that seem to have a field day exploiting people who are dwarves, have 20 kids, two heads, weigh a half ton, or whatever other mutation is of interest at the moment, TLC for example. This is such a horrible network. It used to be good, but now it's just like a marathon of circus-like programming. The bearded lady, followed by the lizard man, and then married with 20 children and counting...please, someone tell these people to tie the tubes!! Now that I've done ranting about the parade of endless no talent bums that are called stars, in any area of entertainment, politics, and even sports, I say enough is enough! Who cares if Bristol Palin marries that dirtbag Levi? Really? Who cares? Turn the channel and see the next big thing on the thing that won't die... For us "nobodies", we need to re examine what we watch, listen to and pay to see....Seriously.
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Aug 9, 2010 10:49:32 GMT -5
^ Yes, the society is going down the tubes and Hollywood is leading the way.
I stopped going to see new movies a few years ago and I now use my TV only to keep tabs on what aspect of the agenda is currently being pushed. Once you know what they're doing it becomes a sort to window into their plans.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Aug 9, 2010 18:26:13 GMT -5
The Reality show itself is a sign how pathetic things are. They can't come up with new ideas for tv shows besides vampires and cops, so they use unsuspecting morons to be the next media whore...and they are cheaper than celebrities.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Aug 21, 2010 16:51:32 GMT -5
|
|