|
Post by goro on May 23, 2011 8:35:49 GMT -5
"In Touch" magazine had a cover story (forced viewing at thousands of grocery checkout lines) on how different (F)ristol looks from the previous Bristol, last week. There was a heavy mass media campaign about the startling changeover. Of course not one piece mentioned the obvious fact that an imposter is being used, any more than the Emperor's CIAlothes were tugged over the obviously fake Fauxsama shooting by "Rainbow 6""Navy Seals 6 I am the Walrus etc.) uber-kommando brigade idiocy. I know. It seems like it goes back to this alleged "code" that the critters have to adhere to where they have to let us know what they're doing, but they do it through obfuscation, storytelling, science fiction, and metaphor -- so we don't GET that it's REAL. So here they are at least paying lip service to the idea of acknowledging how Bristol/Fristol obviously doesn't look anything like earlier Bristols/Fristols - but they aren't taking things to the most logical conclusion, that she's been replaced. Since she's a replacement for a replacement, it's even weirder.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on May 28, 2011 6:54:41 GMT -5
Is this a publicity stunt or what?
"Sarah Palin Furious Over Bristol Palin's New Boyfriend Kyle Massey
Sarah Palin is reportedly angry at her daughter Bristol after it became public that Bristol is dating her Dancing with the Stars competitor Kyle Massey.
Bristol, 20, and Kyle, 19, became quick friends during the reality competition, and the National Enquirer reports that the two began to secretly dance together.
A source told the National Enquirer: "Sarah is furious at Bristol for going so quickly from man to man. She is doing her best to prevent Bristol’s new relationship from being featured in the reality show. But Bristol told Sarah: 'Back off and let me lead my own life!' She doesn’t agree with her mom’s politics or her controlling ways."
After Bristol broke up with her son's father Levi Johnston, she rebounded with a short relationship with an Alaskan pipeline worker named Gino Paoletti."
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on May 28, 2011 16:32:45 GMT -5
Is this a publicity stunt or what? "Sarah Palin Furious Over Bristol Palin's New Boyfriend Kyle Massey Sarah Palin is reportedly angry at her daughter Bristol after it became public that Bristol is dating her Dancing with the Stars competitor Kyle Massey. Bristol, 20, and Kyle, 19, became quick friends during the reality competition, and the National Enquirer reports that the two began to secretly dance together. A source told the National Enquirer: "Sarah is furious at Bristol for going so quickly from man to man. She is doing her best to prevent Bristol’s new relationship from being featured in the reality show. But Bristol told Sarah: 'Back off and let me lead my own life!' She doesn’t agree with her mom’s politics or her controlling ways." After Bristol broke up with her son's father Levi Johnston, she rebounded with a short relationship with an Alaskan pipeline worker named Gino Paoletti." So she never married Levi Johnston the alleged father of her alleged baby (what was its name again?) Bristol's fake pregnancy announcement, (that came during the 2008 campaign just after the news that Republican VP nominee Sarah Palin had been faking pregnancy/birth of "trig" to cover for Bristol's teen pregnancy in 2007-2008 first hit the mainstream media, the Guardian UK) must have been fake because it was announced she was already >5< months pregnant in the first announcemnt in 2008, a high number that was designed to squash those first reporst that Gov. Sarah Palin had been faking pregnancy/birth in April 2008, as 5 months would be too soon since April for Bristol to have gotten pregnant again, biologically. So, clearing the GOP/CIAscum smoke, what are we left with? What is the fate of that fake Bristol baby? What is the fate of the earlier, REAL Bristol-birthed baby, they mockingly namefd "trig," for whom Sarah Palin was faking pregnancy? And I have to ask again, why didn't they just abort Bristol's 2007 unborn baby "Trig"? I find it rad to believe these Nazioid scum actually believe in the right-to-life campaign stuff they speak. They certainly want to hate and destroy human life, and all life, after it is born.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on May 28, 2011 16:40:25 GMT -5
Her baby's name is Tripp.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on May 28, 2011 17:06:22 GMT -5
Her baby's name is Tripp. "Tripp" haha they even designed the names to be confused with one another, a la Crowley word manipulation, "tripp" and "trig" tweedledee and tweedledemon....
|
|
|
Post by goro on May 28, 2011 19:36:23 GMT -5
Her baby's name is Tripp. "Tripp" haha they even designed the names to be confused with one another, a la Crowley word manipulation, "tripp" and "trig" tweedledee and tweedledemon.... Plus...Tripp is the last name of Shailey Tripp, who was a prostitute/massage therapist Todd Palin regularly used - and he setn all his police and AIP (I think that's the name of the Alaskan successionist group Todd and Sarah are a part of) buddies to "visit" Shailey, too. So...Todd's daughter (Bristol) just happens to name "Her" child "Tripp," which is your hooker's last name. Right! No coincidences there.
|
|
|
Post by goro on May 28, 2011 19:37:56 GMT -5
Bristol and Levi never got married, they were just engaged for about five minutes this time last year and Bristol made her usual $250,000 from People magazine for the pics. Sarah has that magazine on speed dial, it's an easy way to whistle up extra cash.
Bristol and Kyle aren't really dating but they ARE doing a stupid reality show together with the two of them and Kyle's brother living together in LA. Only since it's Bristol version 5.0 or something around now, it's more accurate to say SOMEBODY posing as Bristol will be on that show.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on May 31, 2011 4:11:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by goro on May 31, 2011 20:38:09 GMT -5
Yeah, it's turned into an absolute, in your face circus with the Paylins now. Or whatever they have become. This week Sarah/Farah will be having dinner with Trump and his reptilian wife. Oh, goody.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 2, 2011 5:41:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 3, 2011 3:51:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 4, 2011 5:06:17 GMT -5
WTF for real?
"Bristol Palin's New Roomies Expect Living Together to Be a Real Tripp
Why the heck is Bristol Palin moving in with two dudes again?
Oh yeah, for do-gooding and whatnot.
Dancing WIth the Stars alum Kyle Massey and his brother Chris have signed on to live with Bristol in L.A. for a Bio Channel reality show that will show them getting involved with their community and trying to positively impact the lives of those less fortunate.
And, you know, maybe Kyle and Chris will get a trip to Alaska out of it...
"Well, it's going to be fun," Chris dished to E! News at the GBK MTV Movie Awards Gifting Suite. "It'll be a lot of fun, we're just going to show her the ropes of L.A., and I think she's going to show us the ropes of her home, too."
"Some frozen ropes!" added Kyle, referring to the chilly climes of Alaska. "Yeah, I think we're going to make a trip up there."
"The premise," the Cory in the House star explained, "is three kids in a big city just trying to make an impact on people's lives, and it's more of a charity-driven, charity-based show about us just lending a hand. We can't tell you more than that."
But, obviously, what the fans want to know is what their controversial new roomie is really like.
"Bristol and I did Dancing With the Stars and we really made a connection on the show because of the fact of the nervous energy and just really being through that whole ordeal and [being] the last two kids standing. And my brother being there every week, we just all started hanging out," Kyle explained.
So, there don't seem to be any hard feelings about Bristol leap-frogging him into the DWTS finals.
The Massey brothers also don't expect to be the only guys in the house once Bristol moves in.
"Definitely!" Chris said when asked if Bristol's son Tripp will make an appearance on their as-yet untitled show. "He'll be around. He'll be one of us for sure!"
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Jun 6, 2011 12:42:39 GMT -5
Don't know if these pics have already been posted (and too lazy to search ) but here are some early photos of Sarah that don't look much like the current version to me: c. 1984:
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 6, 2011 13:12:53 GMT -5
Only the last one was posted here but its ok.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Jun 6, 2011 14:23:01 GMT -5
|
|