quote: "The Beatles Book Monthly" is well known for it's tampered photos
I agree with you, but if "The Beatles Book Monthly" intention was to eliminate suspects about Paul's death / replacement and show Beatles fans that everything was normal, that there's only one Paul McCartney from 1942 to now, I wonder for what reason should they have tampered the photo by puttting 2 or 3 Pauls in the same picture with the concrete risk to generate dangerous suspects about paul's death / replacement?
It doesn't really matter why they may have printed that picture, assuming they are infallible. Maybe somebody on the inside didn't like what was going on and it was their revenge? What does matter is that James Paul McCartney isn't on that photo. I thought he was about a year ago, and had to enlarge it myself to see that it had been manipulated.
You may want to edit your film which claims as fact that Paul McCartney is alive and well. This would otherwise be willful disinformation. I trust you are honest and not one of the CIA disinfo shills who haunt Paul is Dead websites.