Post by lindsayjudy on Nov 28, 2010 22:55:10 GMT -5
I've noticed that Julian Assange looks either like: 1) the husband of Kathleen "Kick" Kennedy, William Cavendish, Lord Hartington, the one who died in WWII or 2) the son of Winston Churchill (name escapes me), the one who married the late Pamela Digby Harriman. Both men were a bit scrawny or slight and seemed shy in the presence of their own wives.
I'm leaning toward William Cavendish, Lord Hartington.
His "wiki-Leaks" are actually pretty tame and many are devoted to attacking and smearing the enemies (Russia and Putin for example)of the USA rulers he is supposedly trying to expose (wink wink), . Many have pointed out that Assange appears to be just another COINTELPRO, "left-gatekeeper" shill agent. The visual (and voice?) evidence in this thread makes me wonder if he ever even really existed at all, and is not just some CIA/MI6 fake identity, "Ass"ange(l) being a role to be played by alternating CIActor scum, playing the part of a magically informed and elusive crusading wink-i-leaks journalist (as if such a thing as a top secret-leak-publishing reporter could even exist int the West today, and not be quicky crushed at the outset).
Last Edit: Nov 29, 2010 21:18:43 GMT -5 by beatlies
I've noticed that Julian Assange looks like the son of Winston Churchill, the one who married the late Pamela Harriman.
Randolph Churchill son and father of Winston Churchill
Julian Assange and Randolph Churchill
Randolph Churchill later dated Claire Luce, one of Joseph Kennedy's conquests whom Julian Assange also happens to have a resemblance with, could that be part of his heritage?
BTW United States Ambassador to France socialite Pamela Digby, who later became Pamela Churchill also dated Giovanni Agnelli of Fiat fame before marrying Averell Harriman, the notorious supporter of Adolf Hitler and Prescott Bush's employer during WWII. She was therefore not only a coordinator of Illuminati libidos but also possibly a 5th columnist operative within the US Diplomatic Corps.
Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker Bush at Brown Brothers Harriman funded Hitler's rise to power as part of the American Nazi 5th Column. Let's remember that during WWII $3 Million was a considerable sum, but only a small fraction of the funds engaged by Harriman and the Bush team to finance the final solution.
His "wiki-Leaks" are actually pretty tame and many are devoted to attacking and smearing the enemies (Russia and Putin for example) of the USA rulers he is supposedly trying to expose (wink wink), . Many have pointed out that Assange appears to be just another COINTELPRO, "left-gatekeeper" shill agent. The visual (and voice?) evidence in this thread makes me wonder if he ever even really existed at all, and is not just some CIA/MI6 fake identity, "Ass"ange(l) being a role to be played by alternating CIActor scum, playing the part of a magically informed and elusive crusading wink-i-leaks journalist (as if such a thing as a top secret-leak-publishing reporter could even exist int the West today, and not be quicky crushed at the outset).
Ange in French means Angel so there's the end of his name. Ange is a typical code name and also could be assimilated with the angelic role as a Mercurial Messenger of God ie. our Illuminati Handlers to be more precise, bringing us LEAKED messages from above. Ass could be British humor mocking those who are made Asses of by believing in the integrity of Wikileaks or it could be short for ASSET which is a typical moniker for operatives who aren't direct agency employees but external agency hirelings.
Intelligence analysis shows Wikileaks to produce quite weak candy bait of a type used by most Intelligence Agencies to establish contact and credibility for double agents giving away low security intelligence in a show of good faith in hopes of establishing networks and infiltrating organizations.
By establishing Wikileaks an Intelligence Agency would, by leaking information soon to be discovered anyways, gain direct access as a first contact outlet to many people in critical positions wanting to disclose secrets. This would place operative Julian Assange and his presumed originating agency at the source of the information, first informed and therefore first to respond behind the scenes to any genuine leaks from elsewhere. With a short but sufficient delay - allegedly for data verification and validation of sources - the information would be leaked once that agency's pawns have been redeployed on the geostrategic chessboard.
While I do not accuse Julian Assange of being an agent, it is rather unlikely that someone operating for some time on sensitive documents such as those released would not be at minimum affiliated with agencies and possibly even be a plant. His recent Interpol arrest warrant on alleged rape charges is puzzling, and we must await the unfolding of events to see whether he is really being persecuted or whether this isn't also a staged form of intimidation for others seeking to emulate Wikileaks, demonstrating what would ensue?
wow so much more information to dig thru ...thank you!
beatlies : I also entertain the idea that ass-ange is a CIA role played by many characters.
Yep, the latest wink-i-"leaks" from the Pentagon straight to "assange" read like a Christmas wish list for rightwing, U.S. neo-con hawks: they are anti-North Korean (timed right for the most recent US-provoked NK crisis), anti-Chinese (and aimed at driving a wedge between China and NK), anti-Russia (timed for the NATO missile-offense threats against russia and the START talks), with barely anything anti-US or anti-a NATO country. Plus assange has publicly stated that "9-11" was not an inside job! The mask has really slipped off this CIA/pentagonazi false flag; it's not obvious what a fascist fraud assagent (a role played by different agents?) and wiki-leaks are.
Post by klcinfowarrior on Dec 3, 2010 0:24:25 GMT -5
beatlies: you know the red flags went up for me when assange was quoted as saying 9/11 truthers annoyed him ..it didn't make sense that a whistleblowing site would be annoyed by such a thing...but, I certainly did not consider the depth of deception that is cialeaks till recently. I think you've hit the nail on the head there! wikileaks is an inside job!!!!!!!
So, is this what it’s all about? We should have guessed! WikiLeaks Being Used to Justify 'Patriot Act' Legislation For Internet - Senator Mitch McConnell called Assange a "high-tech terrorist" on NBC's Meet the Press Sunday and said, "if it‘s found that Assange hasn’t violated the law, then the law should be changed." Over the weekend, an insightful article by Zen Gardner exposed how WikiLeaks resembles an establishment creation. The article correctly pointed out that the WikiLeaks storyline was conforming nicely to the elite's problem-reaction-solution method, with the solution of more tyranny for our safety. WikiLeaks is being used to bring in the agenda on so many levels, but most importantly by setting the precedent of shutting down websites for politically "dangerous" content. Gardner writes: After all, if information is now the enemy, we must carefully police any and every aspect of this dangerous medium -- all for the safety and protection of 'we the people.''
Free Will is YOURS when you understand that you can change your life's software program ANYTIME you focus!
The WikiLeaks Agenda - The "MK Ultra" & Sex/LSD Cult Past of Julian Assange Anonymous Coward User ID: 1141935 Canada 12/7/2010 2:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation The WikiLeaks Agenda - The "MK Ultra" & Sex/LSD Cult Past of Julian Assange Quote
The WikiLeaks Agenda - The "MK Ultra" & Sex/LSD Cult Past of Julian Assange- Webster Tarpley on the Alex Jones Show