|
Post by artemis on Apr 4, 2011 9:07:47 GMT -5
Could it be the real BEV that "went nuts" or FEVERLY? And she had the twins at the age of 49? Was it the work of nature of what? Coz noone ever heard of IVF or a surrogate mother back then, not even a hint. Dont forget her son is named ANTON, methinks in the memory of one of her famous lover, ANTON FURST, who ended tragically. If u ask me, yes, I believe he was "suicided", even it sounds stereotypical. query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE7DA163DF935A15752C1A967958260
|
|
|
Post by goro on Apr 5, 2011 10:18:08 GMT -5
Could it be the real BEV that "went nuts" or FEVERLY? And she had the twins at the age of 49? Was it the work of nature of what? Coz noone ever heard of IVF or a surrogate mother back then, not even a hint. Dont forget her son is named ANTON, methinks in the memory of one of her famous lover, ANTON FURST, who ended tragically. If u ask me, yes, I believe he was "suicided", even it sounds stereotypical. query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE7DA163DF935A15752C1A967958260Good information. I think it's all very possible. One thing I remember for sure is how there was all this press about how Beverly was acting psychotic, pissing Al Pacino off, endangering the twins, etc - when really he had already left her, didn't want the kids, and was violent and/or abusive toward her around the pregnancy issue. Pacino is just like Robert Deniro in that they are both held up as these Italian American/beyond reproach/actor gods here in the US. Nothing bad is ever, ever printed about either of them. The ONLY time any stink came up around Pacino in the mainstream press was related to this situation with Beverly - and she has very much disappeared since then. Like, hasn't even shown up as a guest star in a crime show or anything, which you'd expect to happen. Many things do NOT add up.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 5, 2011 10:26:28 GMT -5
Remember we're talking about FACINO. By that time PACINO was long gone...
|
|
|
Post by goro on Apr 5, 2011 13:07:46 GMT -5
Remember we're talking about FACINO. By that time PACINO was long gone... Absolutely. And both Facino and Deniro (was he replaced?) seem to have signed on to the "system" and received huge protection from the powers that be.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 5, 2011 16:09:34 GMT -5
While we haven't discussed DeNiro, that I can remember, Artemis, did we??
I was wondering if there was something about him, because the shape of his face seemed different to me when I caught him getting some award earlier this year.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Apr 5, 2011 21:56:39 GMT -5
While we haven't discussed DeNiro, that I can remember, Artemis, did we?? I was wondering if there was something about him, because the shape of his face seemed different to me when I caught him getting some award earlier this year. I've wondering about DeNiro for years without yet doing a seious photo/video comparison study. His father was a well-known abstract expressionist (promoted by the CIA and Rockefellers as a "movement") painter in NYC. If DeNiro HASN'T been imposter-replaCIAed like the other celebrity A-list actors, wouldn't that be strange? The "system" of media control in the West turns out to be macabre and totalitarian beyond belief.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 5, 2011 23:52:39 GMT -5
True, no post on DENIRO yet.
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Apr 6, 2011 10:15:31 GMT -5
DeNiro is such an accomplished actor that he replaced himself. ;D
|
|
|
Post by goro on Apr 6, 2011 19:32:04 GMT -5
DeNiro is such an accomplished actor that he replaced himself. ;D LOL! Actually, I've always been confused by DeNiro and Pacino being put on such a high pedestal for their "acting," when they are clearly the same person in every role. Neither man has any ability to do accents, change his inflections, etc. I think the best work DeNiro did actually was as the Frankenstein monster in Kenneth Brannagh's version of that old story - but even so, he was clearly DENIRO DOING FRANKENSTEIN. A "branded" "type" that is instantly recognizeable as HIM. Morbid makeup on him or not.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Apr 6, 2011 20:04:51 GMT -5
Don't forget Beverly's famous "psychotic breakdown" when she had twins by Al Pacino. Supposedly she went "nuts" around that time - at least, since the press is so friendly to Pacino, that's how it was painted. We haven't really heard anything from her since that time period. She reminds me of Susan Sarandon. Also Faye/Phaye Dunaway a bit.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 6, 2011 23:11:26 GMT -5
While we haven't discussed DeNiro, that I can remember, Artemis, did we?? I was wondering if there was something about him, because the shape of his face seemed different to me when I caught him getting some award earlier this year. I've wondering about DeNiro for years without yet doing a seious photo/video comparison study. His father was a well-known abstract expressionist (promoted by the CIA and Rockefellers as a "movement") painter in NYC. If DeNiro HASN'T been imposter-replaCIAed like the other celebrity A-list actors, wouldn't that be strange? The "system" of media control in the West turns out to be macabre and totalitarian beyond belief. Explains why he is famous, this usually happens, stars coming from CIA, or military intelligence.... We need to look further into this particular actor. Like early films before The Godfather era...
|
|
|
Post by sherlok on Apr 7, 2011 0:32:36 GMT -5
DeNiro is such an accomplished actor that he replaced himself. ;D LOL! Actually, I've always been confused by DeNiro and Pacino being put on such a high pedestal for their "acting," when they are clearly the same person in every role. Neither man has any ability to do accents, change his inflections, etc. I agree. I think DeNiro is fine as an actor with those stereotypical gangster type roles but, IMO, he has not particularly demonstrated exceptional ability or range as an actor. Even his more recent comedy films are still playing off his earlier stereotypical bad guy roles. Yet he is often touted as one of the world's best actors, etc. I think the truth is he's a good character actor but no all-around virtuoso. Hollywood does that a lot. They pick a particular actor (for some reason) and heap on the praise and most of the sheeple just go along with it.
|
|
|
Post by artemis on Apr 7, 2011 5:25:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by goro on Apr 7, 2011 8:30:12 GMT -5
Thanks for these, Ms. A! The woman holding the book has a hairline that comes to a POINT......not the rounded hairline the other Ashleys have. Weird!
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Apr 7, 2011 19:20:00 GMT -5
It wouldn't surprise me if all of the Judds hadn't been replaced....but there is definitely a difference in the shape of her face. The early Ashley has an oval face, the others have a heart shaped face.
The eye color on the other pics look dark, but the first pic, the eyes look lighter.
|
|