|  Author | Topic: Barack Obama (Read 3,679 times) |
sherlok
guru
member is offline
![[avatar]](http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/6228/meercat.jpg)
Joined: Oct 2008
Gender: Male 
Posts: 310
Karma: 1 |  | Re: Barack Obama
« Reply #60 on Oct 26, 2009, 11:37pm » | |
A 7th grader figures out that B.O. is related to almost all
previous presidents who are also all related to a King of
England.
http://www.ksbw.com/news/21404492/detail.html
|
Charlie Chaplin once entered a Charlie Chaplin lookalike contest and lost. |
|
GetSmart
Research Associate
member is offline
![[avatar]](http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo36/getsmartwakeup/Getsmart.jpg)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 107
Karma: 1 | | Barack Obama family tree
« Reply #61 on Oct 27, 2009, 6:12am » | |
Hi Sherlok,
Thanks for posting that link. I think that you are onto something. It is interesting to notice that there is an extremely strong correlation between genetic makeup and positions of power. Does this mean that those in power believe there is such as thing as dominant genes?
![[image]](http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo36/getsmartwakeup/ObamaFamilyTree.jpg)
Are there certain genetic combinations which better (read "worse") predispose a person to being demon possessed? The classic observation by onlookers is that they used to be nice people, but as soon as they gained power they went bonkers. Is it power that went to their head or was it someone or something else that went INTO their head?
A scientific method would be to analyse the DNA of each of these individuals and see which genes they have in common, this might enable us to identify and isolate the "Possession Gene". Furthermore, it there was one place we would need to use gene therapy, it is here. If we were able to exorcise our world leaders it would save countless lives and prevent incalculable misery. Because the demons in power lust for war, death and starvation of misery stricken souls to torment.
What is interesting is that Royals have worked extremely hard and without rest for generations to "perfect" the genes of their offspring in order to qualify them as rulers. Could those dark powers who work in the wings of palaces and parliaments deem this a mandatory requirement? How is it requested and justified in a Republic? And why would they prefer using a cloned version of a leader, with the exact same required genes, to replacing that leader with another person?
The American Republic of the United States was offered a choice between two cousins, John Kerry and George W. Bush for President. We can presume that it didn't matter to those behind the scenes which one came forth, they both had a similar genetic makeup making them adequate vessels for occupation and control. Who runs these life sized Voodoo Dolls we call Kings, Queens, Presidents and Premiers?
These leaders are genetically engineered, either the old fashioned was using selective breeding after genealogical analysis or the modern way by replicating the hard work done by earlier generation when they fabricated their own Royals. We can also assume that Barack Obama may have been engineered the modern way, but implanted into a family whose genetic heritage was itself connected to the others so that to the old-fashioned guard he would appear to be of the proper gene pool without having to publicize his genetically engineered conception.
It is therefore safe to say that our Royals and Presidents are Clones. Either they have cloned themselves through inbreeding or they have resorted to genetic engineering technology to assist them in the process.
We are ruled by Clones.
These clones appear to be possessed by demonic spirits who tend to harm common people by reducing them to slavery or thinly disguised tax and interest slavery, totalitarian dominance of a bureaucratic police state, mind control from early education up to brainwashed corporate mentalities or hypnotic satanic messages in music and art.
The Clones are ruled by demons.
What remains to be understood is who rules the demons (dimensional alien entities) or tolerates that they occupy such a position organizing human society into an Evil empire consolidated into a New World Order. If there is a God with an All Seeing Eye, maybe this eye is being tricked by skilled Magicians playing the center stage of our human circus ? It is for us to bring our own eyes to gaze upon their sleight of hand, the magic tricks which also fool the populations of the Earth. Reveal them as the false prophets, masters of deceit, treacherous serpents and inveterate liars which they are. Reject their authority and denounce their illegitimacy. For they are not even human.
Demon possessed Clones who are unfit to rule.
|
GetSmart & WakeUp |
|
beatlies
Moderator
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Female 
Posts: 1,509
Karma: 3 | | Re: Barack Obama
« Reply #62 on Oct 29, 2009, 3:45pm » | |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 02:58 PM
Original message
Orly Taitz Smacked Down: Birther Lawsuit Dismissed
Source: Washington Independent
Central District of California Judge David O. Carter has dismissed Barnett et al v. Obama et al, Orly Taitz’s most successful lawsuit — that is, the one that got the furthest through the legal system — demanding proof of the president’s citizenship. The entire decision is here, and it’s devastating to Taitz. Here’s an excerpt of the disposition, with emphasis in the original:
Interpreting the Constitution is a serious and crucial task with which the federal courts of this nation have been entrusted under Article III. However, that very same Constitution puts limits on the reach of the federal courts. One of those limits is that the Constitution defines processes through which the President can be removed from office. The Constitution does not include a role for the Court in that process. Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by We the People‚ sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
Read more: http://washingtonindependent.com/65703/orly-taitz-smack...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is going to send our FRiends into a frenzy. Judge Carter was "once a Marine, always a Marine", who was going to stand up for justice and patriotism.
Refresh | +13 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Replies to this thread
There are now three posts on this. tabatha Oct-29-09 02:59 PM #1
trouble ahead Howardx Oct-29-09 03:00 PM #2
So the Smith submission to the court was read. tabatha Oct-29-09 03:08 PM #6
Perhaps now she'll go back to doing root canals. SKKY Oct-29-09 03:03 PM #3
I'll bet she's as good at root canals as she is at lawyering. notadmblnd Oct-29-09 03:46 PM #14
This appears to be the ultimate smackdown. I don't know BootinUp Oct-29-09 03:06 PM #4
It is Orly Taitz, not a sane individual MiniMe Oct-29-09 03:15 PM #10
Rum Fun, Sir, Will Break Out Any Minute Here.... The Magistrate Oct-29-09 03:07 PM #5
another weirdo with money (nt) fascisthunter Oct-29-09 03:13 PM #7
I wonder if she'll give it up now. Hope so. - n/t Jim__ Oct-29-09 03:14 PM #8
This was Orly's last best hope gratuitous Oct-29-09 03:14 PM #9
ah, but doesn't it now go to her best buds ... zbdent Oct-29-09 03:16 PM #11
Likely appeal route gratuitous Oct-29-09 04:01 PM #16
Pass popcorn please leftofcool Oct-29-09 03:20 PM #12
unfortunately i fear this will not be the end of these idiots n/t votingupstart Oct-29-09 03:45 PM #13
Poor Orly. She needs a diversion to help her feel better. Gold Metal Flake Oct-29-09 03:50 PM #15
tabatha (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. There are now three posts on this.
However, I should post this quote:
"Having now read the document, I find I have trouble laughing. This is one of the saddest things I’ve ever read.
If Birthers were capable of questioning their own judgment, they might think about how thoroughly wrong they got this former US Marine and what it says about their own patriotism:"
http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=4246
"This “cut and run” call to lay down arms and leave this country defenseless is an effort by Plaintiffs to emasculate the military.
Plaintiffs have inappropriately requested that this Court interfere with internal military affairs. … Plaintiffs only seek to enjoin acts that the President takes as Commander-in-Chief internationally, not domestically. This peculiarity leads the Court to suspect that the constitutional objection is being used as a veil to avoid deployment to countries where the United States military is currently active, such as Iraq or Afghanistan. … The duty to defend is not dependent upon a political or personal view regarding the individual who serves as President and Commander-in-Chief. It is an unequivocal duty to defend our country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Howardx (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. trouble ahead
Edited on Thu Oct-29-09 03:09 PM by Howardx
"The Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court. While the Court seeks to ensure that all interested parties have had the opportunity to be heard, the Court cannot condone the conduct of Plaintiffs’ counsel in her efforts to influence this Court."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
tabatha (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. So the Smith submission to the court was read.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
SKKY (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Perhaps now she'll go back to doing root canals.
AND SHUT THE f**k UP!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. I'll bet she's as good at root canals as she is at lawyering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. This appears to be the ultimate smackdown. I don't know
how anyone can read that opinion or that section of it and see it any other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. It is Orly Taitz, not a sane individual
She will think that Judge Carter made a bad ruling. If she goes too far on this one, I would be guessing that she will be in for another contempt fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rum Fun, Sir, Will Break Out Any Minute Here....
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. another weirdo with money (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder if she'll give it up now. Hope so. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. This was Orly's last best hope
In interview after interview, she crowed about how she had a discovery schedule, a dispositive motion schedule and a trial date in this case. I don't know whether she knows enough about federal civil procedure to know that those are pro forma settings the court makes in every case, but the people interviewing her certainly didn't have a clue. But then, how could a lowly talking chucklehead making a six- or seven-figure annual salary possibly know to consult a real attorney about federal procedure? They'd have to some kind of superbrain or something!
Hopefully Ms. Taitz will be a little more circumspect about poking a California federal judge. But somehow I doubt it. Let the fun begin again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
zbdent (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. ah, but doesn't it now go to her best buds ...
the John Roberts controlled SCOTUS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Likely appeal route
I'd guess she'll try a motion for reconsideration, which isn't really allowed under the federal rules, but that doesn't seem to be much of a bar to some attorneys I could name. Whenever the judgment of dismissal is finalized, she can go to the Ninth Circuit, but I don't think the Ninth Circuit recognizes "Waaaaah, Ricky! He was mean to me!" (in your best Lucille Ball whine) as a basis for appeal.
Depending on how the Ninth Circuit handles it, there's a three judge panel and appeal to the entire group of judges. That could take a couple of years, especially with a lawyer who couldn't get her government defendants served with process for six months. After the Ninth Circuit gets done laughing at her, then she can go to the Supremes. I'd say we'd be looking at 2011 by then, and the bloom will surely be off Orly's rose by that time at her present rate of slippage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Pass popcorn please
Freeper show coming soon to a democratic theater near you
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
votingupstart (449 posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. unfortunately i fear this will not be the end of these idiots n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-29-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Poor Orly. She needs a diversion to help her feel better.
Maybe you can help? I read that she's a bit of a freak.
| |
|
beatlies
Moderator
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,509
Karma: 3 | |
beatlies
Moderator
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,509
Karma: 3 | |
beatlies
Moderator
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,509
Karma: 3 | | Re: Barack Obama
« Reply #65 on Nov 17, 2009, 7:50pm » | |
A fake identities smoking gun? Obama forgets/mispronounces his own daughter's name:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sourc....orgets+d&aqi=g1
---------------------------------
"Obama's half-brother" ---an Obama-resembling CIA agent nesting within China:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20091117/wl_time/08599193969500
"Ndesandjo's life was hardly ordinary even before the world discovered his connection to the President of the United States. Educated in international schools in Nairobi, Ndesandjo, an American citizen, moved to the U.S. after high school, where he earned physics degrees from Stanford and Brown as well as an executive M.B.A. from Emory University. Soon after 9/11, he was laid off from his marketing job at telecommunications-equipment maker Nortel Networks in Atlanta. He decided to reinvent himself by moving to China, a country he had visited with classmates while at Emory. Since 2002, he has taught English and worked as a business consultant in Shenzhen, a 14 million–strong metropolis in southern China, just across the border from Hong Kong. (See the story of Barack Obama's mother.)
His self-published book was released just days before his brother's visit to China. Ndesandjo says he plans to introduce his wife, a native of Henan province whom he married last year, to his brother before he leaves China on Wednesday. During the course of TIME's interview in Guangzhou, Ndesandjo, who speaks fluent Mandarin and practices Chinese calligraphy, was overwhelmingly positive about his life in China, the Chinese people and culture. "I'm so happy my brother is coming to China because I've experienced the warmth and the graciousness of the Chinese people," he says. "If we can continue seeing the mutual positive points in these two great cultures, I think it'll be good for the world in general." "
| |
|
beatlies
Moderator
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,509
Karma: 3 | | Re: Barack Obama
« Reply #66 on Dec 10, 2009, 9:37am » | |
Obama defends US wars as he accepts peace prize
Buzz up!353 votes Send
Email IM Share
Delicious Digg Facebook Fark Newsvine Reddit StumbleUpon Technorati Twitter Yahoo! Bookmarks Print Play Video
Reuters – Obama receives Nobel Peace Prize
Play Video Video:Obama: Afghan draw-down will start in 2011 AP Play Video Video:Raw Video: Obama arrives in Norway for Nobel AP Play Video Barack Obama Video:AP Top Stories AP
AP – US President and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Barack Obama, gives his Nobel speech after receiving the …
By BEN FELLER, Associated Press Writer Ben Feller, Associated Press Writer – 10 mins ago
OSLO – President Barack Obama entered the pantheon of Nobel Peace Prize winners Thursday with humble words, acknowledging his own few accomplishments while delivering a robust defense of war and promising to use the prestigious award to "reach for the world that ought to be."
A wartime president honored for peace, Obama became the first sitting U.S. president in 90 years and the third ever to win the prize — some say prematurely. In this damp, chilly Nordic capital to pick it up, he and his wife, Michelle, whirled through a day filled with Nobel pomp and ceremony.
And yet Obama was staying here only about 24 hours and skipping the traditional second day of festivities. This miffed some in Norway but reflects a White House that sees little value in extra pictures of the president, his poll numbers dropping at home, taking an overseas victory lap while thousands of U.S. troops prepare to go off to war and millions of Americans remain jobless.
Just nine days after ordering 30,000 more U.S. troops into battle in Afghanistan, Obama delivered a Nobel acceptance speech that he saw as a treatise on war's use and prevention. He crafted much of the address himself and the scholarly remarks — at about 4,000 words — were nearly twice as long as his inaugural address.
In them, Obama refused to renounce war for his nation or under his leadership, saying defiantly that "I face the world as it is" and that he is obliged to protect and defend the United States.
"A nonviolent movement could not have halted Hitler's armies. Negotiations cannot convince al-Qaida's leaders to lay down their arms," Obama said. "To say that force is sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism, it is a recognition of history."
The president laid out the circumstances where war is justified — in self-defense, to come to the aid of an invaded nation and on humanitarian grounds, such as when civilians are slaughtered by their own government or a civil war threatens to engulf an entire region.
"The belief that peace is desirable is rarely enough to achieve it," he said.
He also spoke bluntly of the cost of war, saying of the Afghanistan buildup he just ordered that "some will kill, some will be killed."
"No matter how justified, war promises human tragedy," he said.
But he also stressed the need to fight war according to "rules of conduct" that reject torture and other methods. And he emphasized the need to exhaust alternatives to violence, using diplomatic outreach and sanctions with teeth to confront nations such as Iran or North Korea that defy international demands to halt their nuclear programs or those such as Sudan, Congo or Burma that brutalize their citizens.
"Let us reach for the world that ought to be," Obama said. "We can understand that there will be war, and still strive for peace."
In awarding the prize to Obama, the Nobel panel cited his call for a world free of nuclear weapons, for a more engaged U.S. role in combating global warming, for his support of the United Nations and multilateral diplomacy and for broadly capturing the attention of the world and giving its people "hope."
But the Nobel committee made its announcement in October when he wasn't even nine months on the job, recognizing his aspirations more than his achievements.
Echoing the surprise that seemed the most common reaction to his win, Obama started his 36-minute speech by saying that others who have done more and suffered more may better deserve the honor.
"I am at the beginning, and not the end, of my labors on the world stage," the president said. "Compared to some of the giants of history who have received this prize ... my accomplishments are slight."
The list of Nobel peace laureates over the last 100 years includes transformative figures and giants of the world stage. They include heroes of the president, such as the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela and others he has long admired, like George Marshall, who launched a postwar recovery plan for Europe.
Earlier, Obama had said that the criticism might recede if he advances some of his goals. But, he added, proving doubters wrong is "not really my concern."
"If I'm not successful, then all the praise in the world won't disguise that fact," he said.
The timing of the award ceremonies, coming so soon after Obama's Afghanistan announcement, lent inspiration to peace activists.
The president's motorcade arrived at Oslo's high-rise government complex for Obama's meeting with Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg as a few dozen anti-war protesters gathered behind wire fences nearby. Dressed in black hoods and waving banners, the demonstrators banged drums and chanted anti-war slogans. "The Afghan people are paying the price," some shouted. [AND IRAQ? SEEM TO HAVE FORGOTTEN ALL ABOUT THAT ONGOING USA MASS RAPE/SLAUGHER/TORTURE INVASION-GENOCIDE, AND THE RECENT CIA MILITARY COUP IN HONDURAS AND USA-INFLAMED WAR IN COLOMBIA, THREATENING VENEZUELA....]
Greenpeace and anti-war activists planned larger demonstrations later that were expected to draw several thousand people. Protesters have plastered posters around the city, featuring an Obama campaign poster altered with skepticism to say, "Change?"
The debate at home over his Afghanistan decision also followed the president here. He told reporters that that the July 2011 date he set for the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan to begin will not slip — but that the pace of the full drawdown will be gradual and conditions-based.
"We're not going to see some sharp cliff, some precipitous drawdown," Obama said.
Obama's first stop in Oslo was the Norwegian Nobel Institute, where the Nobel committee meets to make its decisions. After signing the guest book, Obama told reporters he had penned thanks to the committee and noted the pictures of former winners filling the wall, many of whom gave "voice to the voiceless."
In the evening, Obama is expected to wave to a torchlight procession from his hotel balcony and stroll with Norwegian royalty to a dinner banquet. He will offer comments a second time there and cap his brisk jaunt to Europe.
The president and his wife, Michelle, arrived here in the morning, coming off Air Force One holding hands and smiling. Having left Washington Wednesday night, Obama was due back by midday Friday.
The Nobel honor comes with a $1.4 million prize. The White House says Obama will give that to charities but has not yet decided which ones.
__
![[image]](http://www.liberalrapture.com/uploaded_images/Fraud-Obama-6-1-782628.jpg)
| |
|
beatlies
Moderator
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,509
Karma: 3 | | Re: Barack Obama
« Reply #67 on Dec 29, 2009, 10:20pm » | |
kpete (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 08:56 PM
Original message
Obama orders creation of declassification center
Source: Washington Post
Obama orders creation of declassification center
By Michael D. Shear
President Obama created by executive order Tuesday a National Declassification Center to oversee efforts to make once-secret government documents public.
The order comes as part of Obama's promise to push government to err on the side of disclosure as it tackles the need to keep certain information from the public.
In a post on the White House blog, William H. Leary, the senior director of records and access management at the National Security Council, writes that the effort is aimed at shifting the burden of defending secrecy to the government.
"While the Government must be able to prevent the public disclosure of information that would compromise the national security, a democratic government accountable to the people must be as transparent as possible and must not withhold information for self-serving reasons or simply to avoid embarrassment," Leary wrote.
Read more: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/12/obama-order...
Refresh | +41 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Replies to this thread
Love this! Rec'd! nt babylonsister Dec-29-09 08:58 PM #1
Let's start with the torture tapes and pics. The ones that might get America really angry valerief Dec-29-09 09:01 PM #2
America is already angry...... FrenchieCat Dec-29-09 09:18 PM #6
Not angry enough if we didn't do a citizens arrest on Bush/Cheney. shadowknows69 Dec-29-09 09:27 PM #7
Very good news niceypoo Dec-29-09 09:09 PM #3
Let it begin! asjr Dec-29-09 09:13 PM #4
EXCELLENT! Jefferson23 Dec-29-09 09:13 PM #5
+1 cutlassmama Dec-29-09 09:28 PM #8
More ProSense Dec-29-09 09:29 PM #9
A great reason to be proud of my vote for him. Excellent. nt blondeatlast Dec-29-09 09:31 PM #10
Love it! n/t Politicub Dec-29-09 09:38 PM #11
One of those "the devil's in the details" Gamey Dec-29-09 09:39 PM #12
Yep... Assume this is nothing but theater unless proven otherwise. Iowa Dec-29-09 09:57 PM #16
Kick and Rec. Another promise on the way to being kept. Hekate Dec-29-09 09:43 PM #13
K&R BumRushDaShow Dec-29-09 09:46 PM #14
This is a positive development. We shall see. JDPriestly Dec-29-09 09:56 PM #15
Good move forward..... earcandle Dec-29-09 10:00 PM #17
K&R Bolo Boffin Dec-29-09 10:05 PM #18
Goodfor him, as long as it isn't mere symbolism. Vidar Dec-29-09 10:09 PM #19
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Love this! Rec'd! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
valerief (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let's start with the torture tapes and pics. The ones that might get America really angry
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 09:01 PM by valerief
with Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. America is already angry......
I think it's the rest of the world
that we may want to try to keep
chilled out.
I like flying in airplanes....
I don't think we need to recruit some more
incensed Jihadest just now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not angry enough if we didn't do a citizens arrest on Bush/Cheney.
Or demand that our President upholds the rule of law and punish war criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very good news
About time
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
asjr (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let it begin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Jefferson23 (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. EXCELLENT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
cutlassmama (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ProSense (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. More
here
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. A great reason to be proud of my vote for him. Excellent. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Politicub (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Love it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Gamey (196 posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. One of those "the devil's in the details"
Seriously? I can't be the only cynical one here? Always assume you are being lied to then work your way to the truth from there. If there is one thing the horrible Bush years taught me is never take anything at face value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Iowa (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yep... Assume this is nothing but theater unless proven otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Hekate (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick and Rec. Another promise on the way to being kept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is a positive development. We shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
earcandle (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Good move forward.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R
Very good, sir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Vidar (1000+ posts) Tue Dec-29-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Goodfor him, as long as it isn't mere symbolism.
| |
|
GetSmart
Research Associate
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 107
Karma: 1 | | Re: Barack Obama
« Reply #68 on Jan 1, 2010, 8:09pm » | |
Dec 31, 2009, 9:06pm, Paul Bearer wrote:| http://www.psychicskyhorse.com/panmancan.html |
|
Paul Bearer,
Your spam ad for your new website has nothing to do with this thread on Barack Obama. Are you trying to get advertising clicks or had you planned on one day offering a web page exposing his imposture as head of state or allegiance to an Alien power?
What gives?
EDIT:
OK, I read the following in the 2012 rubric of that link:
http://www.psychicskyhorse.com/a.html
It seems that the fellow calling himself Skyhorse maintains that our entire life experience is just a software matrix and that the celebrities and leaders which inhabit this matrix are just programming assistants unrolling the software.
This would mean that according to him, unless I am mistaken, what we perceive as Alien invaders occupying the loftiest functions on Earth are actually techno nerd tinkerers working for the higher ups from other spiritual planes.
Seemingly the software would want us to live in a messed up irremediably screwed up world with a majority of suffering and injustice and the belittling of anything noble or worthwhile by those who work as programming assistants.
I fail to concur.
FINAL EDIT:
That link used to carry comparison photos of Barack Obama which were pertinent to this thread, so I humbly extend my apologies to our fellow member.
|
GetSmart & WakeUp |
|
beatlies
Moderator
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,509
Karma: 3 | |
beatlies
Moderator
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,509
Karma: 3 | |
beatlies
Moderator
member is offline
Joined: Oct 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,509
Karma: 3 | | Re: Barack Obama
« Reply #71 Today at 2:45pm » | |
Identity-faking CIA-Obama is nothing more than the CIA's improved version of General Colin Powell: a smiling, well-spoken, liberalish man to push through their most horrific, genocidal schemes for imperialism and world domination, who is able to blunt criticism of the racism and fascism involved by dint of his being a Black man, and in Obama's case "a liberal Democrat." The propaganda drones on Madison Avenue call this "covering your weak points." Another comparison might be with the 1960s CIA's installation of Tshombe to be their puppet in the Congo, to replace the assassinated real-deal, leftist-nationalist Patrice Lumumba.
More on the Bizarre, Incredible Absence of any Verifiable Trace of Obama at Columbia University:
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message985360/pg1
Also note the name change: Barry Obama to Barry Soetoro to Barack Obama
Obama Never Attended Columbia University
Quote
[link to americangrandjury.org]
1) Columbia University will not divulge whether the ¡°alleged¡± diploma issued was in the name of Barry Soetoro or Barack Hussein Obama. No public record exists regarding the diploma.
American Grand Jury has archived extensive records over the past year which we used in our jury hearings. We now believe beyond a reasonable doubt that Obama is not a ¡°natural born¡± citizen and it is even possible that he may be an illegal alien.
We also have records showing the Democratic National Convention fraudulently declared Obama constitutionally eligible while never vetting the ¡°natural born¡± requirement with the electorate.
Now, new evidence has come to light whereby Dr. James Manning has declared that Obama never attended Columbia University [New York].
Dr. Manning has hired a team of investigators to comb over every bit of available evidence to validate his declaration.
Manning¡¯s investigators conclusively state that:
2) Obama alleges he attended Columbia in 1982, 1983. But, the investigators have been UNABLE to turn up a single shred of written documentation for the years 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 that show where Obama appeared on a school roster, register, faculty memo, bulletin board, school awards, dean¡¯s list; where Obama¡¯s name appeared in a yearbook, club record, fraternity record, extra curricular activity member roster, student newspaper, student radio or tv activity; where Obama appeared in any records as a worker, employee, laborer in or about Columbia University; where Obama enrolled in any sports activity or program.
3) As a graduating senior in 1983 he does not appear in any Political Science (his major) or Granduating Class yearbook or invitation records.
4) There is absolutely no documentation of any kind to show Obama attended, lived, worked or played at Columbia University during the investigated 4 years.
5) Interviewed professors, college employees, students (who were at Columbia during the years in question) have failed to turn up a single person that can remember Obama. This is irrefutable evidence. Think about your own situation if Obama had attended your college? A ¡°now-famous¡± person went to your school? Many would be able to say, ¡°of course I remember.¡± At Columbia, not a single person has been able to say he or she remembers Obama.
| |
| |
|
![[Home]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/home.gif)
![[Help]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/help.gif)
![[Search]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/search.gif)
![[Login]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/login.gif)
![[Register]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/register.gif)
![[Search This Thread]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/search2.gif)
![[Send Topic To Friend]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/buttons/sendtopic.gif)
![[Print]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/buttons/print.gif)
Logged